World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
50
Citations
18038
World Ranking
1053
National Ranking
489

Jonathan Taylor publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Taylor sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 142 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jonathan Taylor D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Taylor is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research centers on fields of mathematics, with specific emphasis on statistics and probability. Their work also extends into subfields including molecular biology, artificial intelligence, environmental engineering, and management science and operations research.

Their scholarly output includes contributions to several main topics, such as statistical methods and inference, Gaussian processes and Bayesian inference, advanced causal inference techniques, statistical methods and Bayesian inference more broadly, ferroptosis and cancer prognosis, bioinformatics and genomic networks, and soil geostatistics and mapping.

Jonathan Taylor has published frequently in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), with four publications, the Journal of the American Statistical Association, with two publications, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), with two publications, The Annals of Statistics, and Science Advances.

Recent papers authored by or involving Jonathan Taylor include:

  • Approximate Selective Inference via Maximum Likelihood, 2022, Journal of the American Statistical Association
  • Integrative methods for post-selection inference under convex constraints, 2021, The Annals of Statistics
  • Reconstructing codependent cellular cross-talk in lung adenocarcinoma using REMI, 2022, Science Advances
  • Survival analysis on rare events using group-regularized multi-response Cox regression, 2021, Bioinformatics
  • Inferring Treatment Effects After Testing Instrument Strength in Linear Models, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Jonathan Taylor has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including Robert Tibshirani, Trevor Hastie, Gareth James, Daniela Witten, and Snigdha Panigrahi.

In addition to journal articles, Jonathan Taylor has contributed to book publications. One noted publication is An Introduction to Statistical Learning, published by Springer International Publishing in 2023, which has accumulated a notable number of citations.

Best Publications

  • Random Fields and Geometry

    Robert J. Adler;Jonathan E. Taylor

  • Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach

    John D. Storey;Jonathan E. Taylor;David Siegmund

  • Distributed neural representation of expected value.

    Brian Knutson;Jonathan Taylor;Matthew Kaufman;Richard Peterson

  • The solution path of the generalized lasso

    Ryan J. Tibshirani;Jonathan Taylor

  • Exact post-selection inference, with application to the lasso

    Jason D. Lee;Dennis L. Sun;Yuekai Sun;Jonathan E. Taylor

  • A SIGNIFICANCE TEST FOR THE LASSO.

    Richard Lockhart;Jonathan Taylor;Ryan J. Tibshirani;Robert Tibshirani

  • Strong rules for discarding predictors in lasso-type problems

    Robert Tibshirani;Jacob Bien;Jerome Friedman;Trevor Hastie

  • A lasso for hierarchical interactions

    Jacob Bien;Jonathan Taylor;Robert Tibshirani

  • Structural Asymmetries in the Human Brain: a Voxel-based Statistical Analysis of 142 MRI Scans

    K E Watkins;T Paus;J P Lerch;A Zijdenbos

  • Degrees of freedom in lasso problems

    Ryan J. Tibshirani;Jonathan Taylor

  • Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory.

    Keith J. Worsley;Jonathan E. Taylor;Francesco Tomaiuolo;Jason Lerch

  • Statistical learning and selective inference

    Jonathan Taylor;Robert J. Tibshirani

  • Exact Post-Selection Inference for Sequential Regression Procedures

    Ryan J. Tibshirani;Jonathan Taylor;Richard Lockhart;Robert Tibshirani

  • Genotypic predictors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

    Soo-Yon Rhee;Jonathan Taylor;Gauhar Wadhera;Asa Ben-Hur

  • Deformation-based surface morphometry applied to gray matter deformation.

    Moo K. Chung;Keith J. Worsley;Keith J. Worsley;Steve Robbins;Tomáš Paus

  • Optimal Inference After Model Selection

    William Fithian;Dennis Sun;Jonathan Taylor

  • Forward Stagewise Regression and the Monotone Lasso

    Trevor Hastie;Jonathan Taylor;Robert Tibshirani;Guenther Walther

  • SurfStat: A Matlab toolbox for the statistical analysis of univariate and multivariate surface and volumetric data using linear mixed effects models and random field theory

    KJ Worsley;JE Taylor;F Carbonell;MK Chung

  • Statistical mapping analysis of lesion location and neurological disability in multiple sclerosis: application to 452 patient data sets

    Arnaud Charil;Alex P Zijdenbos;Jonathan Taylor;Cyrus Boelman

  • Interpretable whole-brain prediction analysis with GraphNet

    Logan Grosenick;Brad Klingenberg;Kiefer Katovich;Brian Knutson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Tibshirani
Robert Tibshirani Stanford University
Robert J. Adler
Robert J. Adler Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Ryan J. Tibshirani
Ryan J. Tibshirani University of California, Berkeley
Keith J. Worsley
Keith J. Worsley McGill University
Jason D. Lee
Jason D. Lee Princeton University
Robert W. Shafer
Robert W. Shafer Stanford University
Soo-Yon Rhee
Soo-Yon Rhee Stanford University
Moo K. Chung
Moo K. Chung University of Wisconsin–Madison
Alan C. Evans
Alan C. Evans McGill University
Brian Knutson
Brian Knutson Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals choose to enhance their expertise with advanced degrees such as a dba programs online, which focus on business analytics and decision-making—skills that complement mathematical knowledge.

Others may pursue a cheap masters in finance to delve into financial modeling and risk management, blending quantitative skills with practical finance applications. Such degrees are often affordable and flexible, catering to working professionals.

For those aiming to boost leadership potential quickly, the fastest online mba programs offer accelerated routes to earn an MBA, integrating management principles with analytical thinking.

Additionally, a masters degree in marketing can provide valuable insights into market analysis and data-driven strategies—areas where mathematical proficiency is an asset.

Choosing the right online degree depends on career goals, time commitment, and budget, but these options illustrate how mathematics graduates can diversify their expertise to succeed in finance, business, and marketing sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles