World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Keith J. Worsley

Keith J. Worsley

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
60
Citations
40097
World Ranking
529
National Ranking
19

Keith J. Worsley publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith J. Worsley sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 105 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Keith J. Worsley D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith J. Worsley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science

Overview

Keith J. Worsley was affiliated with McGill University in Canada during their academic career. They contributed to the scientific community in a capacity that led to recognition such as the Fellowship of the Royal Society of Canada awarded in 2003 by the Academy of Science.

The body of their work did not list specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues in the provided data. Similarly, there were no details available on book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work, which may indicate that the public records or available datasets do not capture the complete scope of their scholarly output.

Worsley's research contributions were situated in an academic environment known for interdisciplinary work, suggesting potential involvement in multiple areas of study, although precise disciplines remain unspecified from the data. Their recognition by a prestigious scholarly society implies contributions that had a notable impact within their fields.

Due to the absence of listed co-authors, publication venues, or topical details, no further breakdown into specialized research areas or collaboration patterns can be provided.

The scientist is recorded as deceased, and their legacy remains tied to their affiliation and the award received during their career.

Best Publications

  • Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach

    K. J. Friston;A. P. Holmes;K. J. Worsley;J.-P. Poline

  • A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

    K. J. Worsley;S. Marrett;P. Neelin;A. C. Vandal

  • Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited--again.

    K.J. Worsley;K.J. Friston

  • A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain.

    K. J. Worsley;A. C. Evans;S. Marrett;P. Neelin

  • Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent

    K. J. Friston;K. J. Worsley;R. S. J. Frackowiak;J. C. Mazziotta

  • A general statistical analysis for fMRI data.

    Keith J. Worsley;C. H. Liao;John A. D. Aston;John A. D. Aston;John A. D. Aston;V. Petre

  • Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses.

    K.J. Friston;A.P. Holmes;C.J. Price;C. Büchel

  • How many subjects constitute a study

    Karl J. Friston;Andrew P. Holmes;Keith J. Worsley

  • Statistical analysis of activation images

    Keith J. Worsley

  • Combining Spatial Extent and Peak Intensity to Test for Activations in Functional Imaging

    Poline Jb;Worsley Kj;Evans Ac;Friston Kj

  • Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods

    Satoru Hayasaka;K. Luan Phan;Israel Liberzon;Keith J. Worsley

  • Structural Asymmetries in the Human Brain: a Voxel-based Statistical Analysis of 142 MRI Scans

    K E Watkins;T Paus;J P Lerch;A Zijdenbos

  • Detecting changes in nonisotropic images.

    K.J. Worsley;M. Andermann;T. Koulis;D. MacDonald

  • Anatomical mapping of functional activation in stereotactic coordinate space

    Alan C Evans;Sean Marrett;Sean Marrett;Peter Neelin;Peter Neelin;Louis Collins;Louis Collins

  • A unified statistical approach to deformation-based morphometry.

    M.K. Chung;K.J. Worsley;K.J. Worsley;T. Paus;C. Cherif

  • Topological FDR for neuroimaging.

    Justin R. Chumbley;Keith J. Worsley;Guillaume Flandin;Karl J. Friston

  • Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory.

    Keith J. Worsley;Jonathan E. Taylor;Francesco Tomaiuolo;Jason Lerch

  • Characterizing the Response of PET and fMRI Data Using Multivariate Linear Models

    Worsley Kj;Poline Jb;Friston Kj;Evans Ac

  • Deformation-based surface morphometry applied to gray matter deformation.

    Moo K. Chung;Keith J. Worsley;Keith J. Worsley;Steve Robbins;Tomáš Paus

  • Searching scale space for activation in PET images.

    K. J. Worsley;S. Marrett;P. Neelin;A. C. Evans

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan C. Evans
Alan C. Evans McGill University
Jonathan Taylor
Jonathan Taylor Stanford University
Tomáš Paus
Tomáš Paus University of Toronto
Karl J. Friston
Karl J. Friston University College London
Jean-Baptiste Poline
Jean-Baptiste Poline Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Alain Dagher
Alain Dagher Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Moo K. Chung
Moo K. Chung University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sean Marrett
Sean Marrett National Institutes of Health
Jason P. Lerch
Jason P. Lerch Hospital for Sick Children
Michael Petrides
Michael Petrides McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, often complemented by related fields. For instance, pursuing an ms in digital marketing degree cost tuition fees can be an excellent option for those interested in combining analytical skills with marketing strategies.

Many students also consider accelerated business education through 1 year mba programs, which provide a fast-track way to gain leadership and management expertise complementing quantitative backgrounds.

Flexibility is crucial, so exploring transfer credits for online mba programs can save time and reduce costs when advancing your education or pivoting careers.

Finally, a masters in data analytics is highly relevant for math graduates aiming to work in data-driven sectors, blending statistical knowledge with practical technical skills.

Best Scientists Citing Keith J. Worsley

Recently Published Articles