World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
7770
World Ranking
5772
National Ranking
619

Jonathan Storkey publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Storkey sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 120 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jonathan Storkey D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Storkey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Storkey is affiliated with Rothamsted Research in the United Kingdom. Their research is primarily focused on Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Within these broad fields, they have produced numerous publications covering subfields such as Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, and Insect Science.

The scientist's work revolves around several main topics, including:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Biological Control of Invasive Species

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jonathan Storkey include the following:

  • "An ecological future for weed science to sustain crop production and the environment. A review," 2020, published in Agronomy for Sustainable Development
  • "Long-term evidence for ecological intensification as a pathway to sustainable agriculture," 2022, published in Nature Sustainability
  • "An Integrated Weed Management framework: A pan-European perspective," 2021, published in European Journal of Agronomy
  • "Century long fertilization reduces stochasticity controlling grassland microbial community succession," 2020, published in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • "Agricultural fertilisers contribute substantially to microplastic concentrations in UK soils," 2024, published in Communications Earth & Environment

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Jonathan Storkey include:

  • Andrew Mead
  • James M. Bullock
  • Cyrille Violle
  • Alice E. Milne
  • John W. Redhead

The scientist's work has appeared often in several publication venues, notably:

  • Agronomy for Sustainable Development
  • Field Crops Research
  • Trends in Plant Science
  • Agronomy
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits

    Francesco de Bello;Sandra Lavorel;Sandra Myrna Diaz;Richard Harrington

  • The impact of agricultural intensification and land-use change on the European arable flora

    J. Storkey;S. Meyer;K. S. Still;C. Leuschner

  • Climate Change and Future Pollen Allergy in Europe.

    Iain R. Lake;Natalia R. Jones;Maureen Agnew;Clare M. Goodess

  • A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services.

    Sandra Lavorel;Jonathan Storkey;Richard D. Bardgett;Francesco de Bello

  • An ecological future for weed science to sustain crop production and the environment. A review

    Chloe Anne Maclaren;Chloe Anne Maclaren;Jonathan Storkey;Alexander Menegat;Helen Metcalfe

  • A review of the potential for competitive cereal cultivars as a tool in integrated weed management.

    I K S Andrew;J Storkey;D L Sparkes

  • Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services

    L Jones;L Norton;Z Austin;Z Austin;A L Browne;A L Browne

  • What good is weed diversity

    J Storkey;P Neve

  • Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in terrestrial ecosystems: Its impact on plant communities and consequences across trophic levels

    Carly J. Stevens;Thomas I. David;Thomas I. David;Jonathan Storkey

  • Grassland biodiversity bounces back from long-term nitrogen addition

    J. Storkey;A. J. Macdonald;P. R. Poulton;T. Scott

  • Effects of climate change and seed dispersal on airborne ragweed pollen loads in Europe

    Lynda Hamaoui-Laguel;Robert Vautard;Li Liu;Fabien Solmon

  • A functional group approach to the management of UK arable weeds to support biological diversity

    J Storkey

  • Long-term evidence for ecological intensification as a pathway to sustainable agriculture

    Unknown

  • Using Assembly Theory to Explain Changes in a Weed Flora in Response to Agricultural Intensification

    J. Storkey;Stephen R. Moss;John W. Cussans

  • A process-based approach to predicting the effect of climate change on the distribution of an invasive allergenic plant in Europe

    Jonathan Storkey;Pierre Stratonovitch;Daniel S. Chapman;Francesco Vidotto

  • Managing arable weeds for biodiversity

    Jonathan Storkey;Duncan B Westbury

  • Plant-microbe networks in soil are weakened by century-long use of inorganic fertilizers

    Ruilin Huang;Steve P. McGrath;Penny R. Hirsch;Ian M. Clark

  • Engineering a plant community to deliver multiple ecosystem services

    Jonathan Storkey;Thomas Döring;John Baddeley;Rosemary Collins

  • Symposium The Broadbalk long-term experiment at Rothamsted: what has it told us about weeds?

    Stephen R. Moss;Jonathan Storkey;John W. Cussans;Sarah A. M. Perryman

  • Century long fertilization reduces stochasticity controlling grassland microbial community succession

    Yuting Liang;Daliang Ning;Zhenmei Lu;Zhenmei Lu;Na Zhang

  • Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan

    P Neve;J N Barney;Y Buckley;Roger D Cousens

  • Erratum: "Climate Change and Future Pollen Allergy in Europe".

    Iain R. Lake;Natalia R. Jones;Maureen Agnew;Clare M. Goodess

  • SPECIAL FEATURE: FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services

    Sandra Lavorel;Jonathan Storkey;Richard D. Bardgett;Francesco de Bello

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Holland
John M. Holland Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
Jizhong Zhou
Jizhong Zhou University of Oklahoma
Ian Clark
Ian Clark Rothamsted Research
Cyrille Violle
Cyrille Violle Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
François Munoz
François Munoz Grenoble Alpes University
Steve P. McGrath
Steve P. McGrath Rothamsted Research
Mikhail A. Semenov
Mikhail A. Semenov Rothamsted Research
Penny R. Hirsch
Penny R. Hirsch Rothamsted Research
Paul Neve
Paul Neve University of Copenhagen
Liyou Wu
Liyou Wu University of Oklahoma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to interdisciplinary careers—often at the intersection of science, research, and healthcare. As the demand for skilled professionals grows, many pursue advanced or alternative online degrees to expand their expertise and job prospects.

For those already holding an associate degree in nursing, asn to fnp programs offer a streamlined path to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. These bridge programs are ideal for individuals eager to integrate ecological and public health concepts within clinical settings.

If you’re a non-nurse with a strong science background interested in transitioning directly into nursing, direct entry msn programs provide the fastest route into advanced healthcare leadership roles, which may include environmental health specialties.

Selecting the right institution is also crucial. When comparing online nursing programs, factors like curriculum, flexibility, and cost come into play. Learn more about top choices in the detailed comparison of capella university vs wgu rn to bsn programs.

Affordability remains a top concern for many students. Online bridge programs make it easier to advance your credentials without breaking the bank. Discover some of the bsn to msn programs online that balance quality with cost—helping you shape a rewarding career in biology, healthcare, or beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Storkey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles