World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
7250
World Ranking
12919
National Ranking
5214

Mathematics

D-Index
31
Citations
7057
World Ranking
3273
National Ranking
1293

Jon Lee publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Lee sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 193 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jon Lee D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Lee sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon Lee is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Computer Science, Mathematics, and Engineering. Specifically, their work addresses subfields such as Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics, and Statistics and Probability.

The scientist's research topics focus on areas including Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research, Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques, Matrix Theory and Algorithms, Machine Learning and Algorithms, Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs, Optimization and Search Problems, and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models.

Jon Lee has published across a variety of venues, with frequent contributions in arXiv (Cornell University), Mathematical Programming, Discrete Applied Mathematics, Journal of Global Optimization, and INFORMS journal on computing.

Recent published papers include:

  • Scenario Grouping and Decomposition Algorithms for Chance-Constrained Programs, 2020, INFORMS journal on computing
  • Polynomial Upper Bounds on the Number of Differing Columns of Δ-Modular Integer Programs, 2022, Mathematics of Operations Research
  • Mixing convex-optimization bounds for maximum-entropy sampling, 2021, Mathematical Programming
  • D-Optimal Data Fusion: Exact and Approximation Algorithms, 2023, INFORMS journal on computing
  • On Computing with Some Convex Relaxations for the Maximum-Entropy Sampling Problem, 2023, INFORMS journal on computing

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Marcia Fampa, Luze Xu, Gabriel Ponte, Zhong-Zhu Chen, and Daphne Skipper.

Jon Lee is also an author of a book published by Springer International Publishing titled "Maximum-Entropy Sampling" (2022).

Best Publications

  • An algorithmic framework for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs

    Pierre Bonami;Lorenz T. Biegler;Andrew R. Conn;GéRard CornuéJols

  • Branching and bounds tighteningtechniques for non-convex MINLP

    Pietro Belotti;Jon Lee;Leo Liberti;Francois Margot

  • Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming

    Jon Lee;Sven Leyffer

  • An Exact Algorithm for Maximum Entropy Sampling

    Chun-Wa Ko;Jon Lee;Maurice Queyranne

  • Non-monotone submodular maximization under matroid and knapsack constraints

    Jon Lee;Vahab S. Mirrokni;Viswanath Nagarajan;Maxim Sviridenko

  • On the optimal design of water distribution networks: a practical MINLP approach

    Cristiana Bragalli;Claudia D’Ambrosio;Jon Lee;Andrea Lodi

  • Submodular Maximization over Multiple Matroids via Generalized Exchange Properties

    Jon Lee;Maxim Sviridenko;Jan Vondrák

  • Nonlinear Integer Programming

    Raymond Hemmecke;Matthias Köppe;Jon Lee;Robert Weismantel

  • Non-monotone submodular maximization under matroid and knapsack constraints

    Jon Lee;Vahab Mirrokni;Viswanath Nagarjan;Maxim Sviridenko

  • Maximizing Nonmonotone Submodular Functions under Matroid or Knapsack Constraints

    Jon Lee;Vahab S. Mirrokni;Viswanath Nagarajan;Maxim Sviridenko

  • A First Course in Combinatorial Optimization

    Jon Lee

  • Convex relaxations of non-convex mixed integer quadratically constrained programs: extended formulations

    Anureet Saxena;Pierre Bonami;Jon Lee

  • Min-up/min-down polytopes

    Jon Lee;Janny Leung;FrançOis Margot

  • Toward online, worldwide access to Vatican Library materials

    F. C. Mintzer;L. E. Boyle;A. N. Cazes;B. S. Christian

  • Constrained Maximum-Entropy Sampling

    Jon Lee

  • Discretization orders for distance geometry problems

    Carlile Lavor;Jon Lee;Audrey Lee-St. John;Leo Liberti

  • Polyhedral methods for piecewise-linear functions I: the lambda method

    Jon Lee;Dan Wilson

  • On convex relaxations of quadrilinear terms

    Sonia Cafieri;Jon Lee;Leo Liberti

  • Water network design by MINLP

    Cristiana Bragalli;Claudia D'Ambrosio;J. Lee;Andrea Lodi

  • Expressing combinatorial problems by systems of polynomial equations and hilbert's nullstellensatz

    J. a. Loera;J. Lee;S. Margulies;S. Onn

  • On the number of realizations of certain Henneberg graphs arising in protein conformation

    Leo Liberti;Benoít Masson;Jon Lee;Carlile Lavor

Frequent Co-Authors

Leo Liberti
Leo Liberti École Polytechnique
Maxim Sviridenko
Maxim Sviridenko Yahoo (United States)
Andrea Lodi
Andrea Lodi Cornell University
Jesús A. De Loera
Jesús A. De Loera University of California, Davis
Paolo Toth
Paolo Toth University of Bologna
Jan Vondrák
Jan Vondrák Stanford University
Carlile Lavor
Carlile Lavor State University of Campinas
Vahab Mirrokni
Vahab Mirrokni Google (United States)
Don Coppersmith
Don Coppersmith IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring mathematics in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees that can enhance career prospects. For those interested in business leadership, an easiest MBA program may offer a flexible pathway to combine quantitative skills with management expertise. These programs often emphasize practical application, making them accessible for students transitioning from math backgrounds.

Another popular option is pursuing an easiest online MBA program. These degrees provide convenience and allow students to balance work, study, and personal commitments while gaining essential business acumen relevant to mathematics professionals.

For individuals aiming to advance further into leadership, the most affordable online DBA programs present a cost-effective way to pursue a Doctor of Business Administration, a degree that blends research with practical business strategies.

Finance is another lucrative pathway for math graduates. Many look into the cheapest online master's in finance to deepen their understanding of financial markets while keeping costs manageable. This specialization supports careers in investment, banking, and financial analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Jon Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles