World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
65
Citations
13740
World Ranking
1811
National Ranking
35

Jon Ågren publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Ågren sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 164 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jon Ågren D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Ågren sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon Ågren is affiliated with Uppsala University in Sweden and focuses their academic research on fields including Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Environmental Science.

Their work spans several subfields, particularly Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Molecular Biology. The primary research topics involve Plant and Animal Studies, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Plant Reproductive Biology, Evolution and Genetic Dynamics, and Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals.

Jon Ågren has contributed to multiple recent scholarly papers, among which are:

  • What Do We Really Know About Adaptation at Range Edges? (2020, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics)
  • Evolvability and trait function predict phenotypic divergence of plant populations (2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Evolution of floral scent in relation to self-incompatibility and capacity for autonomous self-pollination in the perennial herb Arabis alpina (2021, Annals of Botany)
  • A large-effect fitness trade-off across environments is explained by a single mutation affecting cold acclimation (2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Climate drives rhizosphere microbiome variation and divergent selection between geographically distant Arabidopsis populations (2022, New Phytologist)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Evolution, Molecular Ecology, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Collaborations form an important facet of their research, with frequent coauthors including Thomas James Ellis, Christopher G. Oakley, John McKay, Nina Sletvold, and Per Toräng.

Best Publications

  • Rapid Regulation of Light Harvesting and Plant Fitness in the Field

    Carsten Külheim;Jon Ågren;Stefan Jansson

  • Population Size, Pollinator Limitation, and Seed Set in the Self‐ Incompatible Herb Lythrum Salicaria

    Jon Agren

  • POLLINATION SUCCESS IN A DECEPTIVE ORCHID IS ENHANCED BY CO-OCCURRING REWARDING MAGNET PLANTS

    Steven D. Johnson;Craig I. Peter;L. Anders Nilsson;Jon Ågren

  • The scale of population structure in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Alexander Platt;Matthew Horton;Yu S. Huang;Yan Li

  • Reciprocal transplants demonstrate strong adaptive differentiation of the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana in its native range

    Jon Ågren;Douglas W. Schemske

  • Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B. semiovata

    Jon Ågren;Douglas W. Schemske

  • Latitudinal population differentiation in phenology, life history and flower morphology in the perennial herb Lythrum salicaria

    Katarina Olsson;Jon Ågren

  • Root microbiota assembly and adaptive differentiation among European Arabidopsis populations.

    Thorsten Thiergart;Paloma Durán;Thomas Ellis;Nathan Vannier

  • Variation in trichome density and resistance against a specialist insect herbivore in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana

    Richard Handley;Barbara Ekbom;Jon Ågren

  • Leaf Trichome Formation and Plant Resistance to Herbivory

    Peter Dalin;Jon Ågren;Christer Björkman;Piritta Huttunen

  • Sexual Differences in Biomass and Nutrient Allocation in the Dioecious Rubus Chamaemorus

    Jon Agren

  • Genetic mapping of adaptation reveals fitness tradeoffs in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Jon Ågren;Christopher G. Oakley;John K. McKay;John T. Lovell

  • Associational resistance: insect damage to purple loosestrife reduced in thickets of sweet gale.

    Peter A. Hambäck;Jon Ågren;Lars Ericson

  • The Cost of Defense Against Herbivores: An Experimental Study of Trichome Production in Brassica rapa

    Jon Agren;Douglas W. Schemske

  • Age and size structure of Pinus sylvestris populations on mires in central and northern Sweden

    Jon Agren;Olle Zackrisson

  • Pollinator visitation, stigmatic pollen loads and among-population variation in seed set in Lythrum salicaria

    Anna R. Waites;Jon Ågren

  • The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio.

    Steven D. Johnson;Craig I. Peter;Jon Agren

  • Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and flowering time in the perennial herb Arabidopsis lyrata.

    Saskia Sandring;Jon Ågren

  • Pollinator shifts and the evolution of spur length in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia

    Elin Boberg;Ronny Alexandersson;Magdalena Jonsson;Johanne Maad

  • Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display, spur length and flowering phenology in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica

    Nina Sletvold;John M. Grindeland;Jon Ågren

  • Sexual Dimorphism and Biotic Interactions

    Jon Ågren;Kjell Danell;Thomas Elmqvist;Lars Ericson

Frequent Co-Authors

Nina Sletvold
Nina Sletvold Uppsala University
Douglas W. Schemske
Douglas W. Schemske Michigan State University
Johan Ehrlén
Johan Ehrlén Stockholm University
George Coupland
George Coupland Max Planck Society
Steven D. Johnson
Steven D. Johnson University of KwaZulu-Natal
Lars Ericson
Lars Ericson Umeå University
Outi Savolainen
Outi Savolainen University of Oulu
Roberto Bassi
Roberto Bassi University of Verona
Stefan Jansson
Stefan Jansson Umeå University
Bengt Hansson
Bengt Hansson Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens diverse options for online study. For students seeking flexible learning, nonprofit online universities provide accredited degrees with a focus on affordability and quality, making them a solid choice for science majors.

Many career paths in biology intersect with healthcare and social impact roles. If you have a background in nursing, bsn to msn online programs can help you advance your professional skills while exploring the connections between ecological health and human well-being.

Online learning is ideal for active military and veterans who require flexibility. Check resources on online colleges for military to find institutions that understand your unique needs and offer strong STEM programs.

Ecology and Evolution are also relevant to social advocacy. If you want to apply your knowledge to community outreach or support roles, social work masters programs online enable you to blend environmental awareness with helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Jon Ågren

Trending Scientists