World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
53
Citations
8524
World Ranking
522
National Ranking
35

John P. Gibson publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John P. Gibson sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 239 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

John P. Gibson D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John P. Gibson sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: a community's view.

    Oduola Abiola;Joe M. Angel;Philip Avner;Alexander A. Bachmanov

  • Effect of Total Allelic Relationship on Accuracy of Evaluation and Response to Selection

    A Nejati-Javaremi;C Smith;J P Gibson

  • Animal genetic resources and economic development: issues in relation to economic valuation

    J.E.O. Rege;John P. Gibson

  • Analyses of published genetic parameter estimates for beef production traits. 2. Phenotypic and genetic correlations

    Unknown

  • Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling trypanotolerance in a cross of tolerant West African N’Dama and susceptible East African Boran cattle

    Olivier H. Hanotte;Y. Ronin;Morris Agaba;P. Nilsson

  • Estimates of genetic parameters and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as inferred using molecular pedigrees

    Anthony G Fishback;Roy G Danzmann;Moira M Ferguson;John P Gibson

  • Weitzman's Approach and Conservation of Breed Diversity: an Application to African Cattle Breeds

    S.B. Reist-Marti;H. Simianer;John P. Gibson;Olivier H. Hanotte

  • An approach to the optimal allocation of conservation funds to minimize loss of genetic diversity between livestock breeds

    H. Simianer;S. Marti;John P. Gibson;Olivier H. Hanotte

  • Quantitative trait loci for upper thermal tolerance in outbred strains of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

    Guy M L Perry;Roy G Danzmann;Moira M Ferguson;John P Gibson

  • Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic relationships in selection decisions.

    J. R. Brisbane;J. P. Gibson

  • Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Female Reproductive Traits on Porcine Chromosome 8

    Annemarie H. King;Zhihua Jiang;John P. Gibson;Chris S. Haley

  • Use of body linear measurements to estimate liveweight of crossbred dairy cattle in smallholder farms in Kenya

    M. N. Lukuyu;J. P. Gibson;D. B. Savage;A. J. Duncan

  • The information nucleus-a new concept to enhance sheep industry genetic improvement

    N M Fogarty;Robert Banks;Julius Herman Van Der Werf;Alex Ball

  • Combination of multiple microsatellite data sets to investigate genetic diversity and admixture of domestic cattle.

    A. R. Freeman;D. G. Bradley;S. Nagda;J. P. Gibson;J. P. Gibson

  • Realized Sampling Variances of Estimates of Genetic Parameters and the Difference Between Genetic and Phenotypic Correlations

    Kenneth R. Koots;John P. Gibson

  • Genetic and expression analysis of cattle identifies candidate genes in pathways responding to Trypanosoma congolense infection.

    Harry Noyes;Andy Brass;Isaiah Obara;Susan Anderson

  • Livestock Genomics for Developing Countries – African Examples in Practice

    Karen Marshall;John P. Gibson;Okeyo Mwai;Joram M. Mwacharo

  • The use of constrained selection indexes in breeding for economic merit.

    J. P. Gibson;B. W. Kennedy

  • The effects of frequency of feeding on milk production of dairy cattle: an analysis of published results

    J. P. Gibson

  • The influence of breed, gender, and PSS (Halothane) genotype on meat quality, cooking loss, and palatability of pork

    L.E Jeremiah;J.P Gibson;L.L Gibson;R.O Ball

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph C. Arezzo
Joseph C. Arezzo Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Charles E. Schroeder
Charles E. Schroeder Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Animal Science and Veterinary fields opens various opportunities that extend beyond traditional roles. For instance, individuals interested in health and fitness within animal care may explore online exercise science degrees, which provide knowledge applicable to physical rehabilitation and wellness programs for animals and humans alike.

For those aiming to take on leadership roles in sports or animal-related athletic programs, understanding the educational requirements is crucial. The article on what degree do you need to be an athletic director offers valuable insights into the qualifications necessary for managing athletic departments, an area that can intersect with animal therapy and sports science.

Behavioral analysis is another promising pathway, especially in veterinary behavior or animal training contexts. Accredited programs, such as bcba accredited programs, ensure rigorous training in behavior analysis, which is invaluable for specialized animal care careers.

Lastly, integrating psychology principles is increasingly important for comprehensive animal care. Exploring nasp accredited school psychology programs can provide foundational knowledge in behavior and cognition, which enhances understanding of both human and animal interactions in clinical or educational settings.

Best Scientists Citing John P. Gibson

Recently Published Articles