| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 6550 | 6096 | 3556 | 3226 | 222 | 13222 |
The chart shows the history of publications by John M. Oldham between 1960 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John M. Oldham published across 66 years, from 1960 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2011. 8 of the 381 publications appeared in the last two years.
381 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1960 | 1 |
| 1961 | 0 |
| 1962 | 0 |
| 1963 | 0 |
| 1964 | 0 |
| 1965 | 0 |
| 1966 | 0 |
| 1967 | 0 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0 |
| 1971 | 0 |
| 1972 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 1 |
| 1980 | 2 |
| 1981 | 0 |
| 1982 | 2 |
| 1983 | 4 |
| 1984 | 3 |
| 1985 | 0 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 9 |
| 1988 | 5 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 3 |
| 1991 | 3 |
| 1992 | 4 |
| 1993 | 5 |
| 1994 | 5 |
| 1995 | 5 |
| 1996 | 5 |
| 1997 | 4 |
| 1998 | 2 |
| 1999 | 10 |
| 2000 | 8 |
| 2001 | 12 |
| 2002 | 14 |
| 2003 | 4 |
| 2004 | 9 |
| 2005 | 12 |
| 2006 | 9 |
| 2007 | 10 |
| 2008 | 13 |
| 2009 | 14 |
| 2010 | 10 |
| 2011 | 25 |
| 2012 | 16 |
| 2013 | 17 |
| 2014 | 21 |
| 2015 | 19 |
| 2016 | 13 |
| 2017 | 13 |
| 2018 | 8 |
| 2019 | 10 |
| 2020 | 15 |
| 2021 | 10 |
| 2022 | 8 |
| 2023 | 8 |
| 2024 | 6 |
| 2025 | 2 |
| Total | 381 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Oldham sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 222 publications — 75th percentile
75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 31–40 | 6 | |
| 41–50 | 52 | |
| 51–60 | 138 | |
| 61–70 | 299 | |
| 71–80 | 461 | |
| 81–90 | 605 | |
| 91–100 | 713 | |
| 101–110 | 736 | |
| 111–120 | 686 | |
| 121–130 | 670 | |
| 131–140 | 644 | |
| 141–150 | 597 | |
| 151–160 | 576 | |
| 161–170 | 477 | |
| 171–180 | 450 | |
| 181–190 | 397 | |
| 191–200 | 343 | |
| 201–210 | 328 | |
| 211–220 | 313 | |
| 221–230 | 283 | 222 |
| 231–240 | 226 | |
| 241–250 | 196 | |
| 251–260 | 201 | |
| 261–270 | 171 | |
| 271–280 | 151 | |
| 281–290 | 139 | |
| 291–300 | 113 | |
| 301–310 | 102 | |
| 311–320 | 100 | |
| 321–330 | 76 | |
| 331–340 | 92 | |
| 341–350 | 85 | |
| 351–360 | 69 | |
| 361–370 | 71 | |
| 371–380 | 63 | |
| 381–390 | 58 | |
| 391–400 | 57 | |
| 401–410 | 43 | |
| 411–420 | 33 | |
| 421–430 | 50 | |
| 431–440 | 41 | |
| 441–450 | 32 | |
| 451–460 | 27 | |
| 461–470 | 28 | |
| 471–480 | 25 | |
| 481–490 | 28 | |
| 491–500 | 20 | |
| 501–510 | 23 | |
| 511–520 | 26 | |
| 521–530 | 17 | |
| 531–540 | 21 | |
| 541–550 | 14 | |
| 551–560 | 16 | |
| 561–570 | 10 | |
| 571–580 | 22 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 14 | |
| 601–610 | 9 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 4 | |
| 631–640 | 7 | |
| 641–650 | 5 | |
| 651–660 | 10 | |
| 661–670 | 8 | |
| 671–680 | 8 | |
| 681–690 | 4 | |
| 691–700 | 3 | |
| 701–704 | 4 | |
| 705+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Oldham sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile
43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 398 | |
| 32–33 | 702 | |
| 34–35 | 671 | |
| 36–37 | 659 | |
| 38–39 | 641 | |
| 40–41 | 671 | |
| 42–43 | 617 | |
| 44–45 | 558 | 45 |
| 46–47 | 495 | |
| 48–49 | 487 | |
| 50–51 | 445 | |
| 52–53 | 390 | |
| 54–55 | 408 | |
| 56–57 | 345 | |
| 58–59 | 325 | |
| 60–61 | 321 | |
| 62–63 | 248 | |
| 64–65 | 290 | |
| 66–67 | 218 | |
| 68–69 | 219 | |
| 70–71 | 215 | |
| 72–73 | 183 | |
| 74–75 | 169 | |
| 76–77 | 132 | |
| 78–79 | 137 | |
| 80–81 | 120 | |
| 82–83 | 112 | |
| 84–85 | 86 | |
| 86–87 | 101 | |
| 88–89 | 83 | |
| 90–91 | 77 | |
| 92–93 | 70 | |
| 94–95 | 78 | |
| 96–97 | 58 | |
| 98–99 | 53 | |
| 100–101 | 57 | |
| 102–103 | 48 | |
| 104–105 | 53 | |
| 106–107 | 46 | |
| 108–109 | 24 | |
| 110–111 | 35 | |
| 112–113 | 27 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 31 | |
| 118–119 | 22 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 24 | |
| 124–125 | 18 | |
| 126–127 | 11 | |
| 128–129 | 19 | |
| 130–131 | 10 | |
| 132–133 | 16 | |
| 134–135 | 10 | |
| 136–137 | 12 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 5 | |
| 142–143 | 12 | |
| 144+ | 98 |
Donna S. Bender;Regina T. Dolan;Andrew E. Skodol;Charles A. Sanislow
Andrew E. Skodol;John G. Gunderson;Thomas H. McGlashan;Ingrid R. Dyck
John M. Oldham
Carla Sharp;Aidan G. C. Wright;J. Christopher Fowler;B. Christopher Frueh
S E Hyler;A E Skodol;H D Kellman;J M Oldham
J M Oldham;A E Skodol;H D Kellman;S E Hyler
Oldham Jm;Skodol Ae;Kellman Hd;Hyler Se
Andrew E. Skodol;Lee Anna Clark;Donna S. Bender;Robert F. Krueger
Jeffrey G. Johnson;Patricia Cohen;Elizabeth Smailes;Stephanie Kasen
Unknown
Andrew E. Skodol;Donna S. Bender;Leslie C. Morey;Lee Anna Clark
Andrew E. Skodol;John M. Oldham;Peggy E. Gallaher
John G. Gunderson;M. Tracie Shea;Andrew E. Skodol;Thomas H. McGlashan
Jeffrey G. Johnson;Patricia Cohen;Elizabeth M. Smailes;Andrew E. Skodol
Steven E. Hyler;Andrew E. Skodol;John M. Oldham;H. David Kellman
Unknown
Jeffrey G. Johnson;Patricia Cohen;Andrew E. Skodol;John M. Oldham
Andrew E. Skodol;John M. Oldham;Donna S. Bender;Ingrid R. Dyck
Andrew E. Skodol;Robert L. Stout;Thomas H. McGlashan;Carlos M. Grilo
J. Christopher Fowler;J. Christopher Fowler;Ruby Charak;Ruby Charak;Jon D. Elhai;Jon G. Allen;Jon G. Allen
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.