World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona

Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 38 8195 7901 199 196 207 4433

Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2004. 9 of the 306 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2004. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 13 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 2 publications
1986 2026

306 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 1
1999 4
2000 4
2001 1
2002 1
2003 13
2004 25
2005 22
2006 10
2007 20
2008 15
2009 20
2010 11
2011 13
2012 7
2013 10
2014 12
2015 7
2016 5
2017 3
2018 18
2019 15
2020 5
2021 13
2022 13
2023 15
2024 10
2025 7
2026 2
Total 306
Download as CSV

Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 207 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403 207
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350 38
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona is affiliated with King Juan Carlos University in Spain and specializes in research within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their primary research topics cover Software Engineering Research, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Software System Performance and Reliability, Open Source Software Innovations, and Data Visualization and Analytics.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona include:

  • "How bugs are born: a model to identify how bugs are introduced in software components" (2020, Empirical Software Engineering)
  • "GrimoireLab: A toolset for software development analytics" (2021, PeerJ Computer Science)
  • "A multi-dimensional analysis of technical lag in Debian-based Docker images" (2021, Empirical Software Engineering)
  • "A Brief History of Free, Open Source Software and Its Communities" (2021, Computer)
  • "CodeCity: A comparison of on-screen and virtual reality" (2022, Information and Software Technology)

Frequent coauthors appearing in their publications include Gregório Robles, David Moreno-Lumbreras, Daniel Izquierdo-Cortázar, Michel Maes-Bermejo, and Micael Gallego.

The researcher has contributed to several publication venues, with recurring works published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Empirical Software Engineering, arXiv (Cornell University), SSRN Electronic Journal, and Computer.

Best Publications

  • On the Inequality of Contributions to Wikipedia

    F. Ortega;J.M. Gonzalez-Barahona;G. Robles

  • Applying Social Network Analysis to the Information in CVS Repositories.

    Luis López-Fernández;Gregorio Robles;Jesús M. González-Barahona

  • Evolution and growth in large libre software projects

    G. Robles;J.J. Amor;J.M. Gonzalez-Barahona;I. Herraiz

  • Remote analysis and measurement of libre software systems by means of the CVSAnalY tool

    G. Robles

  • Macro-level software evolution: a case study of a large software compilation

    Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona;Gregorio Robles;Martin Michlmayr;Juan José Amor

  • Contributor Turnover in Libre Software Projects

    Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona

  • On the reproducibility of empirical software engineering studies based on data retrieved from development repositories

    Jesús M. González-Barahona;Gregorio Robles

  • Developer identification methods for integrated data from various sources

    Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona

  • The evolution of the laws of software evolution: A discussion based on a systematic literature review

    Israel Herraiz;Daniel Rodriguez;Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona

  • The processes of joining in global distributed software projects

    Israel Herraiz;Gregorio Robles;Juan JosÉ Amor;Teófilo Romera

  • Applying Social Network Analysis Techniques to Community-Driven Libre Software Projects

    Luis López-Fernández;Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona;Israel Herraiz

  • Evolution of the core team of developers in libre software projects

    Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona;Israel Herraiz

  • Beyond source code: the importance of other artifacts in software development (a case study)

    Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona;Juan Julian Merelo

  • Evolution of Volunteer Participation in Libre Software Projects: Evidence from Debian

    Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona;Juan Carlos;Martin Michlmayr

  • A Comprehensive Study of Software Forks: Dates, Reasons and Outcomes

    Gregorio Robles;Jesús M. González-Barahona

  • Towards a Theoretical Model for Software Growth

    Israel Herraiz;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona;Gregorio Robles

  • Towards a simplification of the bug report form in eclipse

    Israel Herraiz;Daniel M. German;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona;Gregorio Robles

  • Reproducibility and credibility in empirical software engineering: A case study based on a systematic literature review of the use of the SZZ algorithm

    Gema Rodríguez-Pérez;Gregorio Robles;Jesús M. González-Barahona

  • An Empirical Analysis of Technical Lag in npm Package Dependencies

    Ahmed Zerouali;Eleni Constantinou;Tom Mens;Gregorio Robles

  • Comparison between SLOCs and number of files as size metrics for software evolution analysis

    I. Herraiz;G. Robles;J.M. Gonzalez-Barahona;A. Capiluppi

  • Mining large software compilations over time: another perspective of software evolution

    Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona;Martin Michlmayr;Juan Jose Amor

  • Tools for the Study of the Usual Data Sources found in Libre Software Projects

    Gregorio Robles;Jesús M. González-Barahona;Daniel Izquierdo-Cortazar;Israel Herraiz

  • Estimating development effort in Free/Open source software projects by mining software repositories: a case study of OpenStack

    Gregorio Robles;Jesús M. González-Barahona;Carlos Cervigón;Andrea Capiluppi

  • Community structure of modules in the Apache project

    J.M. Gonzalez-Barahona

  • On the Relation between Outdated Docker Containers, Severity Vulnerabilities, and Bugs

    Ahmed Zerouali;Tom Mens;Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona

  • A Model to Understand the Building and Running Inter-Dependencies of Software

    D.M. German;J.M. Gonzalez-Barahona;G. Robles

  • Lessons Learned from Applying Social Network Analysis on an Industrial Free/Libre/Open Source Software Ecosystem

    Jose Teixeira;Gregorio Robles;Jesús M. González-Barahona

  • Using Social Network Analysis Techniques to Study Collaboration between a FLOSS Community and a Company

    Juan Martinez-Romo;Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona;Miguel Ortuño-Perez

  • How bugs are born: a model to identify how bugs are introduced in software components

    Gema Rodríguez-Pérez;Gregorio Robles;Alexander Serebrenik;Andy Zaidman

  • Perceval: software project data at your will

    Santiago Duenas;Valerio Cosentino;Gregorio Robles;Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregorio Robles
Gregorio Robles King Juan Carlos University
Tom Mens
Tom Mens University of Mons
Ulrike Cress
Ulrike Cress Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Zakaria Maamar
Zakaria Maamar University of Doha for Science and Technology
Brent Hecht
Brent Hecht Northwestern University
Alexander Serebrenik
Alexander Serebrenik Eindhoven University of Technology
Abram Hindle
Abram Hindle University of Alberta
Andy Zaidman
Andy Zaidman Delft University of Technology
Lin Tan
Lin Tan Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a broad spectrum of online degrees and flexible career options. Many students seek related fields to diversify their skills or find hybrid areas that combine engineering concepts with broader business, legal, or management expertise.

For those interested in leadership, an MBA can be a powerful next step. Choosing the cheapest aacsb online mba helps balance quality education with affordability. Similarly, managing human talent is crucial in any technical company, and a cheap online hr masters degree prepares graduates for vital roles in recruitment and organizational development.

Engineering careers often intersect with legal frameworks, making a paralegal certificate online aba-approved a valuable addition for those interested in patent law, compliance, or contract management. On the business side, students looking for faster entry into the service sector might consider online colleges for hospitality management to develop leadership and operational skills in hospitality venues that increasingly rely on cutting-edge technology.

Exploring these pathways can complement an engineering education, opening up exciting, interdisciplinary roles in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles