World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
75
Citations
22942
World Ranking
1416
National Ranking
737

Jayaram K. Udupa publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jayaram K. Udupa sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 499 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jayaram K. Udupa D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jayaram K. Udupa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to medical image processing
  • 2001 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Jayaram K. Udupa is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their work focuses on various advanced topics such as Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies, Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research, Medical Imaging and Analysis, Medical Image Segmentation Techniques, Advanced Neural Network Applications, and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications.

Frequent coauthors of Jayaram K. Udupa include:

  • Drew A. Torigian
  • Yubing Tong
  • Caiyun Wu
  • Joseph M. McDonough
  • Patrick J. Cahill

The venues where Jayaram K. Udupa has commonly published are:

  • Medical Physics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • Medical Imaging 2022: Image Processing

Notable recent papers by Jayaram K. Udupa include:

  • "DiSegNet: A deep dilated convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for lymph node segmentation on PET/CT images" (2020), published in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
  • "Object recognition in medical images via anatomy-guided deep learning" (2022), published in Medical Image Analysis
  • "Combining natural and artificial intelligence for robust automatic anatomy segmentation: Application in neck and thorax auto-contouring" (2022), published in Medical Physics
  • "OFx: A method of 4D image construction from free-breathing non-gated MRI slice acquisitions of the thorax via optical flux" (2021), published in Medical Image Analysis
  • "Thoracic Quantitative Dynamic MRI to Understand Developmental Changes in Normal Ventilatory Dynamics" (2020), published in CHEST Journal

Jayaram K. Udupa has been recognized with awards such as the IEEE Fellow in 2009 for contributions to medical image processing and was named a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • Fuzzy connectedness and object definition: theory, algorithms, and applications in image segmentation

    Jayaram K. Udupa;Supun Samarasekera

  • New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization

    L.G. Nyul;J.K. Udupa;Xuan Zhang

  • User-steered image segmentation paradigms: live wire and live lane

    Alexandre X. Falcão;Jayaram K. Udupa;Supun Samarasekera;Shoba Sharma

  • On standardizing the MR image intensity scale.

    László G. Nyúl;Jayaram K. Udupa

  • Shape-based interpolation of multidimensional objects

    S.P. Raya;J.K. Udupa

  • 3D Imaging In Medicine

    Jayaram K. Udupa;Gabor T. Herman

  • A framework for evaluating image segmentation algorithms

    Jayaram K. Udupa;Vicki R. LeBlanc;Ying Zhuge;Celina Imielinska

  • Scale-Based Fuzzy Connected Image Segmentation

    Punam K. Saha;Jayaram K. Udupa;Dewey Odhner

  • Multiple sclerosis lesion quantification using fuzzy-connectedness principles

    J.K. Udupa;L. Wei;S. Samarasekera;Y. Miki

  • An ultra-fast user-steered image segmentation paradigm: live wire on the fly

    A.X. Falcao;J.K. Udupa;F.K. Miyazawa

  • Shape-based interpolation of multidimensional grey-level images

    G.J. Grevera;J.K. Udupa

  • Surface Shading in the Cuberille Environment

    Lih-Shyang Che;Gabor T.Herman;R. Anthony Reynolds;Jayaram K. Udupa

  • Segmentation and Image Analysis of Abnormal Lungs at CT: Current Approaches, Challenges, and Future Trends

    Awais Mansoor;Ulas Bagci;Brent Foster;Ziyue Xu

  • Optimum image thresholding via class uncertainty and region homogeneity

    P.K. Saha;J.K. Udupa

  • An objective comparison of 3-D image interpolation methods

    G.J. Grevera;J.K. Udupa

  • PET/MR Imaging: Technical Aspects and Potential Clinical Applications

    Drew A. Torigian;Habib Zaidi;Thomas C. Kwee;Babak Saboury

  • Fuzzy connectedness and image segmentation

    J.K. Udupa;P.K. Saha

  • Medical Image Segmentation by Combining Graph Cuts and Oriented Active Appearance Models

    Xinjian Chen;J. K. Udupa;U. Bagci;Ying Zhuge

  • Late-onset minor and major depression: early evidence for common neuroanatomical substrates detected by using MRI

    Anand Kumar;Zhisong Jin;Warren Bilker;Jayaram Udupa

  • Shell rendering

    J.K. Udupa;D. Odhner

  • Adaptive boundary detection using 'live-wire' two-dimensional dynamic programming

    E. Mortensen;B. Morse;W. Barrett;J. Udupa

  • Disclaimer: "Relative fuzzy connectedness and object definition: theory, algorithms, and applications in image segmentation"

    J.K. Udupa;P.K. Saha;R.A. Lotufo

Frequent Co-Authors

Punam K. Saha
Punam K. Saha University of Iowa
Robert I. Grossman
Robert I. Grossman New York University
Alexandre X. Falcão
Alexandre X. Falcão State University of Campinas
Gabor T. Herman
Gabor T. Herman City University of New York
Supun Samarasekera
Supun Samarasekera SRI International
Dennis L. Kolson
Dennis L. Kolson University of Pennsylvania
Ulas Bagci
Ulas Bagci Northwestern University
Abass Alavi
Abass Alavi University of Pennsylvania
Xinjian Chen
Xinjian Chen Soochow University
Li Bai
Li Bai University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a wide array of online degree options and career pathways. Students looking to expand their expertise may consider pursuing advanced degrees in specialized fields, often available in flexible online formats.

For those interested in business leadership alongside technology, online executive mba programs offer a powerful way to develop management skills relevant to tech-driven industries. Likewise, information professionals may find the mlis degree online cost to be an important consideration when advancing their careers in data organization or digital archiving.

Affordability is often a key issue when choosing a graduate program. Comparing affordable graduate schools can help future students minimize debt while maximizing career opportunities. Additionally, those aiming for leading roles in tech or academia might pursue a doctorate organizational leadership online to gain top-tier credentials in organizational strategy and leadership.

With so many online pathways available, students can tailor their education and career journey to meet their goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Jayaram K. Udupa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles