World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 44 16808 15178 4162 3420 118 7439

Jan Florián publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Florián between 1975 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Florián published across 49 years, from 1975 to 2023, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1995. 2 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1995. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication
1975 2023

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Florián: publications per year, 1975 to 2023
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 5
1993 8
1994 5
1995 11
1996 6
1997 8
1998 9
1999 6
2000 5
2001 3
2002 3
2003 2
2004 2
2005 9
2006 4
2007 8
2008 5
2009 2
2010 5
2011 2
2012 3
2013 2
2014 3
2015 1
2016 4
2017 3
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
2023 1
Total 130
Download as CSV

Jan Florián publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Florián sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 118 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623 118
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Florián D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Florián sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808 44
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Florián is affiliated with Loyola University Chicago in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on engineering and medicine. They have contributed notably to electrical and electronic engineering, materials chemistry, orthopedics and sports medicine, complementary and alternative medicine, and physiology.

Their work frequently addresses topics related to:

  • Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
  • Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
  • Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Cardiovascular and Exercise Physiology
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Doping in Sports

Jan Florián has authored research published in several academic venues. These include multiple papers in Studia sportiva, one in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, and another in The Cambridge Structural Database. The papers authored by Jan Florián are:

  • "HIIT system programming and some practical problems of its application examined within the sample of selected Czech probands in Brno", 2022, Studia sportiva
  • "The Selfish Gene as a Possible Driving Force Behind HIIT", 2023, Studia sportiva

In addition to these, Jan Florián has collaborated on studies related to materials science and chemistry, including the papers:

  • "Solid-State Properties and Spectroscopic Analysis of Thin-Film TPBi", 2020, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • "CCDC 2019207: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination", 2021, The Cambridge Structural Database

Their research collaborations often involve coauthors such as Jazmin Calimano, Dalice M. Piñero Cruz, Thomas R. Fielitz, Russell J. Holmes, and Jacob W. Ciszek, each with multiple joint publications. These collaborations span the domains of chemistry, materials science, and sports science, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to their scientific endeavors.

Best Publications

  • Q-Chem 2.0: a high-performance ab initio electronic structure program package

    Jing Kong;Christopher A. White;Christopher A. White;Anna I. Krylov;Anna I. Krylov;David Sherrill;David Sherrill

  • Langevin Dipoles Model for ab Initio Calculations of Chemical Processes in Solution: Parametrization and Application to Hydration Free Energies of Neutral and Ionic Solutes and Conformational Analysis in Aqueous Solution

    Jan Florián;Arieh Warshel

  • Spontaneous DNA Mutations Induced by Proton Transfer in the Guanine·Cytosine Base Pairs: An Energetic Perspective

    Jan Florián;Jerzy Leszczyński

  • Phosphate Ester Hydrolysis in Aqueous Solution: Associative versus Dissociative Mechanisms

    Jan Florián;Arieh Warshel

  • Hybrid ab Initio Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics Calculations of Free Energy Surfaces for Enzymatic Reactions: The Nucleophilic Attack in Subtilisin

    J. Bentzien;R. P. Muller;J. Florian;A. Warshel

  • Mechanistic alternatives in phosphate monoester hydrolysis: What conclusions can be drawn from available experimental data?

    Johan Åqvist;Karin Kolmodin;Jan Florian;Arieh Warshel

  • Thermodynamic Parameters for Stacking and Hydrogen Bonding of Nucleic Acid Bases in Aqueous Solution: Ab Initio/Langevin Dipoles Study

    Jan Florián;and Jiří Šponer;Arieh Warshel

  • Proton Transfer in the Adenine-Thymine Base Pair

    Jan Florian;Vojtech Hrouda;Pavel Hobza

  • Remarkable rate enhancement of orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase is due to transition-state stabilization rather than to ground-state destabilization

    Arieh Warshel;Marek Štrajbl;Jordi Villà;Jan Florián

  • IR and Raman Spectra, Tautomeric Stabilities, and Scaled Quantum Mechanical Force Fields of Protonated Cytosine†

    Jan Florián;Vladimír Baumruk;Jerzy Leszczyński

  • Computer simulation of the chemical catalysis of DNA polymerases: discriminating between alternative nucleotide insertion mechanisms for T7 DNA polymerase.

    Jan Florian;Myron F. Goodman;Arieh Warshel

  • Computer simulations of enzyme catalysis: finding out what has been optimized by evolution.

    Arieh Warshel;Jan Florián

  • Calculations of Hydration Entropies of Hydrophobic, Polar, and Ionic Solutes in the Framework of the Langevin Dipoles Solvation Model

    Jan Florián;Arieh Warshel

  • Calcium-independent calmodulin binding and two-metal-ion catalytic mechanism of anthrax edema factor.

    Yuequan Shen;Natalia L Zhukovskaya;Qing Guo;Jan Florián

  • Comparison and Scaling of Hartree-Fock and Density Functional Harmonic Force Fields. 1. Formamide Monomer

    Jan Florian;Benny G. Johnson

  • Enantioselectivity of Haloalkane Dehalogenases and its Modulation by Surface Loop Engineering

    Zbynek Prokop;Yukari Sato;Jan Brezovsky;Tomas Mozga

  • Nonplanar DNA Base Pairs

    Jiří Šponer;Jan Florián;Pavel Hobza;Jerzy Leszczynski

  • Computer simulations of protein functions: Searching for the molecular origin of the replication fidelity of DNA polymerases

    Jan Florián;Myron F. Goodman;Arieh Warshel

  • A Fundamental Assumption about OH- Attack in Phosphate Ester Hydrolysis Is Not Fully Justified

    Jan Florián;Arieh Warshel

  • Structure, Energetics, and Force Fields of the Cyclic Formamide Dimer: MP2, Hartree-Fock, and Density Functional Study

    Jan Florian;Benny G. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Arieh Warshel
Arieh Warshel University of Southern California
Myron F. Goodman
Myron F. Goodman University of Southern California
Jerzy Leszczynski
Jerzy Leszczynski Jackson State University
Pavel Hobza
Pavel Hobza Czech Academy of Sciences
Wei-Jen Tang
Wei-Jen Tang University of Chicago
Gerald J. Fishman
Gerald J. Fishman Marshall Space Flight Center
Yuji Nagata
Yuji Nagata Tohoku University
Scott D. Barthelmy
Scott D. Barthelmy Goddard Space Flight Center
Charles A. Meegan
Charles A. Meegan University of Alabama in Huntsville
Chryssa Kouveliotou
Chryssa Kouveliotou George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Chemistry, exploring online forensic science courses can be a practical option. These programs blend scientific knowledge with hands-on skills applicable in various investigative fields.

Additionally, pursuing forensic psychology master's programs online offers an avenue to understand the psychological aspects behind criminal behavior, enhancing career prospects in law enforcement and legal sectors.

Graduates with these specialized degrees often find opportunities detailed under forensic science career pathways. These roles typically combine analytical thinking with scientific methods to support criminal investigations and public safety.

It is essential to consider financial factors when selecting programs; reviewing criminal justice degree tuition can help prospective students make informed decisions about affordable education options that align with their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Florián

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles