What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Basalt
- Igneous rock
- Volcano
Jarda Dostal mostly deals with Geochemistry, Basalt, Metasomatism, Mantle and Volcano.
In his articles, he combines various disciplines, including Geochemistry and Fractionation.
Specifically, his work in Basalt is concerned with the study of Petrogenesis.
The various areas that he examines in his Metasomatism study include Xenolith, Amphibole and Peridotite.
His research investigates the connection between Mantle and topics such as Spinel that intersect with problems in Cretaceous, Suture and Massif.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Archean and Volcanic rock.
His most cited work include:
- Zr/hf fractionation in intraplate basaltic rocks: Carbonate metasomatism in the mantle source (191 citations)
- Tethyan, Mediterranean, and Pacific analogues for the Neoproterozoic-Paleozoic birth and development of peri-Gondwanan terranes and their transfer to Laurentia and Laurussia (160 citations)
- Contrasting behaviour of Nb/Ta and Zr/Hf ratios in a peraluminous granitic pluton (Nova Scotia, Canada) (155 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Geochemistry, Basalt, Mafic, Volcanic rock and Petrology.
His study ties his expertise on Pluton together with the subject of Geochemistry.
His Basalt study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Subduction and Mantle.
His work carried out in the field of Mafic brings together such families of science as Granulite, Island arc, Terrane and Ultramafic rock.
The concepts of his Volcanic rock study are interwoven with issues in Continental crust, Volcanic arc, Proterozoic and Archean.
His Petrology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Orogeny, Peralkaline rock, Metamorphic facies and Andesites.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (87.64%)
- Basalt (38.20%)
- Mafic (25.84%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1999-2021)?
- Geochemistry (87.64%)
- Basalt (38.20%)
- Mafic (25.84%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Geochemistry, Basalt, Mafic, Paleontology and Felsic.
His Geochemistry research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Plagioclase and Pluton.
His Pluton research includes themes of Petrogenesis, Magmatism, Fractional crystallization and Incompatible element.
His Basalt research includes elements of Volcano and Mantle.
In Mantle, he works on issues like Andesites, which are connected to Slab window and Peridotite.
His work deals with themes such as Subduction, Forearc, Lithosphere and Craton, which intersect with Mafic.
Between 1999 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Tethyan, Mediterranean, and Pacific analogues for the Neoproterozoic-Paleozoic birth and development of peri-Gondwanan terranes and their transfer to Laurentia and Laurussia (160 citations)
- Contrasting behaviour of Nb/Ta and Zr/Hf ratios in a peraluminous granitic pluton (Nova Scotia, Canada) (155 citations)
- Petrological and geochemical evidence for the origin of the Yarlung Zangbo ophiolites, southern Tibet (108 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Basalt
- Igneous rock
- Volcano
His main research concerns Geochemistry, Zircon, Paleontology, Terrane and Felsic.
His Geochemistry study frequently involves adjacent topics like Granulite.
His Granulite research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Protolith, Provenance, Petrology, Craton and Basement.
As part of one scientific family, Jarda Dostal deals mainly with the area of Zircon, narrowing it down to issues related to the Pluton, and often Incompatible element.
His study explores the link between Terrane and topics such as Mafic that cross with problems in Hotspot, Seismology, Lithosphere, Shear zone and Forearc.
Jarda Dostal studied Orogeny and Ophiolite that intersect with Mantle, Basalt, Spinel, Suture and Cretaceous.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
