World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
9262
World Ranking
6471
National Ranking
2873

Ian Soboroff publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Soboroff sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 166 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ian Soboroff D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Soboroff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian Soboroff is affiliated with the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on areas such as Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, and Signal Processing.

Their work covers several specific topics including Topic Modeling, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Web Data Mining and Analysis, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques, and Multimodal Machine Learning Applications.

Ian Soboroff has contributed to numerous publications, many of which appeared in recognized venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGIR Forum
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Machine Translation
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Ian Soboroff encompass various topics and publication years:

  • TREC-COVID: rationale and structure of an information retrieval shared task for COVID-19 (2020), Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • TREC-COVID (2020), ACM SIGIR Forum
  • TREC-COVID: Constructing a Pandemic Information Retrieval Test Collection (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • On the TREC Blog Track (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Collaborations have played a significant role in their research activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ellen M. Voorhees
  • Dina Demner-Fushman
  • Kyle Lo
  • Lucy Lu Wang
  • William Hersh

Best Publications

  • Overview of TREC 2004

    Ellen M. Voorhees

  • Overview of the TREC 2009 Web Track

    Charles L. A. Clarke;Nick Craswell;Ian Soboroff

  • Overview of the TREC 2006 Blog Track

    Iadh Ounis;Craig Macdonald;Maarten de Rijke;Gilad Mishne

  • Overview of the TREC-2008 Blog Track

    Iadh Ounis;Craig Macdonald;Ian Soboroff

  • Overview of the TREC-2005 Enterprise Track

    Nick Craswell;Arjen P. de Vries;Ian Soboroff

  • Overview of the TREC-2007 Blog Track

    Craig Macdonald;Iadh Ounis;Ian Soboroff

  • The TREC 2002 Filtering Track Report.

    Stephen E. Robertson;Ian Soboroff

  • Ranking retrieval systems without relevance judgments

    Ian Soboroff;Charles Nicholas;Patrick Cahan

  • Overview of the TREC 2003 Novelty Track

    Ian Soboroff;Donna Harman

  • Relevance assessment: are judges exchangeable and does it matter

    Peter Bailey;Nick Craswell;Ian Soboroff;Paul Thomas

  • Overview of the TREC-2011 Microblog Track

    Iadh Ounis;Craig Macdonald;Jimmy Lin;Ian Soboroff

  • Overview of the TREC 2006 Enterprise Track.

    Ian Soboroff;Arjen P. de Vries;Nick Craswell

  • Overview of the TREC 2004 Terabyte Track.

    Charles L. A. Clarke;Nick Craswell;Ian Soboroff

  • The ICWSM 2009 Spinn3r Dataset

    Kevin Burton;Akshay Java;Ian Soboroff

  • Bias and the limits of pooling for large collections

    Chris Buckley;Darrin Dimmick;Ian Soboroff;Ellen Voorhees

  • Overview of the TREC-2012 Microblog Track.

    Ian Soboroff;Iadh Ounis;Craig Macdonald;Jimmy J. Lin

  • A comparative analysis of cascade measures for novelty and diversity

    Charles L.A. Clarke;Nick Craswell;Ian Soboroff;Azin Ashkan

  • ITtalks: a case study in the Semantic Web and DAML+OIL

    R.S. Cost;T. Finin;A. Joshi;Yun Peng

  • Overview of the TREC 2007 Enterprise Track.

    Peter Bailey;Arjen P. de Vries;Nick Craswell;Ian Soboroff

  • Overview of the TREC 2010 Web Track.

    Charles L. A. Clarke;Nick Craswell;Ian Soboroff;Gordon V. Cormack

  • Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

    Jianzhong Li;X. Sean Wang;Minos Garofalakis;Ian Soboroff

  • Overview of the TREC-2012 Microblog Track | NIST

    Ian M. Soboroff;Iadh Ounis;Jimmy Lin;Craig Macdonald

Frequent Co-Authors

Iadh Ounis
Iadh Ounis University of Glasgow
Craig Macdonald
Craig Macdonald University of Glasgow
Nick Craswell
Nick Craswell Microsoft (United States)
Ellen M. Voorhees
Ellen M. Voorhees National Institute of Standards and Technology
Charles L. A. Clarke
Charles L. A. Clarke University of Waterloo
Norbert Fuhr
Norbert Fuhr University of Duisburg-Essen
Tim Finin
Tim Finin University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Tetsuya Sakai
Tetsuya Sakai Waseda University
Jimmy Lin
Jimmy Lin University of Waterloo
Donna Harman
Donna Harman National Institute of Standards and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your educational journey beyond a bachelor’s in Computer Science can open up new career opportunities. Many students seek the cheapest online masters degree options to advance their skills without breaking the bank. These programs provide flexibility and help you balance study, work, and personal life.

For those interested in leadership roles, pursuing an online phd in leadership can pave the way for executive-level positions or academic careers. If you’re looking for foundational education with a quick entry into the workforce, explore easy associate degrees that pay well. These programs suit students wanting to start their tech careers sooner.

Additionally, educators or professionals looking to lead in academic settings can benefit from affordable edd programs online. By considering these diverse pathways, you can align your studies with your career aspirations while keeping costs in check.

Best Scientists Citing Ian Soboroff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles