What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Biochemistry, Gene, Complementary DNA, Powdery mildew and Genetics.
Ian B. Dry has included themes like Ripening and Berry in his Biochemistry study.
His Gene study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Embryo.
His study looks at the relationship between Complementary DNA and fields such as Botany, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
His Powdery mildew research includes elements of Taxon, Taxonomy, Arabidopsis and Internal transcribed spacer.
Ian B. Dry studied Genetics and Virology that intersect with KDEL.
His most cited work include:
- Grapes on steroids. Brassinosteroids are involved in grape berry ripening. (258 citations)
- Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of tomato leaf curl geminivirus (186 citations)
- Characterization of cDNAs encoding two isoforms of granule‐bound starch synthase which show differential expression in developing storage organs of pea and potato (175 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Biochemistry, Gene, Genetics, Virology and Botany are his primary areas of study.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Biochemistry, Molecular biology are connected with Molecular mass and other disciplines.
His research investigates the link between Gene and topics such as Plasmopara viticola that cross with problems in Oomycete and Microbiology.
His Virology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Open reading frame, Geminiviridae and DNA.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Complementary DNA and Pathogen.
His Powdery mildew study combines topics in areas such as Plant disease resistance, Fungicide, Resistance and Locus.
He most often published in these fields:
- Biochemistry (32.86%)
- Gene (20.71%)
- Genetics (19.29%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Crystal structure (5.71%)
- Crystallography (4.29%)
- Domain (5.00%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Ian B. Dry mainly investigates Crystal structure, Crystallography, Domain, Effector and Mutant.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Plant disease resistance and Tris in addition to Crystallography.
His work deals with themes such as Transcription factor, Genetics, Genome and Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, which intersect with Effector.
The concepts of his Cell biology study are interwoven with issues in Innate immune system, Oomycete, NAD+ kinase and Arabidopsis.
As a member of one scientific family, Ian B. Dry mostly works in the field of Arabidopsis, focusing on Pathogen-associated molecular pattern and, on occasion, Gene.
Ian B. Dry is studying WRKY protein domain, which is a component of Gene.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- NAD+ cleavage activity by animal and plant TIR domains in cell death pathways (100 citations)
- Combinatorial Regulation of Stilbene Synthase Genes by WRKY and MYB Transcription Factors in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) (48 citations)
- Genome sequence of Plasmopara viticola and insight into the pathogenic mechanism. (43 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary scientific interests are in Effector, Gene, Cell biology, Plasmopara viticola and Genetics.
Ian B. Dry has included themes like Transcription factor, Promoter, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, NAD+ kinase and Signal transduction in his Effector study.
His work on Gene deals in particular with Transcriptome and Arabidopsis.
His Arabidopsis research includes themes of Pathogen-associated molecular pattern, Pattern recognition receptor, Gene expression and Elicitor.
His Cell biology research includes elements of Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, Protein domain, Conserved sequence and Sterile alpha motif.
His work in Plasmopara viticola covers topics such as Genome which are related to areas like Nicotiana benthamiana, Signal peptide, Oomycete and Subcellular localization.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
