World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 35 6720 6248 262 248 79 5663

Harm J. Hospers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Harm J. Hospers between 1990 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Harm J. Hospers published across 32 years, from 1990 to 2021, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2006. 1 of the 83 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2006. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1990 2021

83 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Harm J. Hospers: publications per year, 1990 to 2021
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 4
2003 1
2004 3
2005 4
2006 10
2007 3
2008 4
2009 9
2010 5
2011 6
2012 4
2013 5
2014 1
2015 3
2016 1
2017 1
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 83
Download as CSV

Harm J. Hospers publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm J. Hospers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 79 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 79
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Harm J. Hospers D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm J. Hospers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243 35
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Harm J. Hospers is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with notable focus on education and developmental and educational psychology, as well as clinical psychology and sociology and political science. The work reflects an interdisciplinary approach engaging with various aspects of learning and mental health.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Changes and Adaptations: How University Students Self-Regulate Their Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Analysing informed learning at Maastricht University (2021), published in Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)

The topics addressed in their research involve:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Education Methods and Technologies

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hospers include:

  • Felicitas Biwer
  • Wisnu Wiradhany
  • Mirjam oude Egbrink
  • Stella Wasenitz
  • Walter Jansen

Their work features in publication venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)

This profile outlines a research focus on how students adapt to evolving learning environments, especially within the context of disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic. It also reflects an engagement with informed learning approaches and the influence of digital technologies on educational processes and adolescent development.

Best Publications

  • Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference?

    C S Skinner;V J Strecher;H Hospers

  • The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings.

    V. J. Strecher;M. Kreuter;D. J. Den Boer;S. Kobrin

  • Why Homosexuality is a Risk Factor for Eating Disorders in Males

    Harm J. Hospers;Anita Jansen

  • Standard care impact on effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Marijn de Bruin;Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Herman P. Schaalma;Gerjo Kok

  • Sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a literature review

    Nicole M.C. van Kesteren;Harm J. Hospers;Gerjo Kok

  • Standard care quality determines treatment outcomes in control groups of HAART-adherence intervention studies: implications for the interpretation and comparison of intervention effects

    Marijn de Bruin;Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Harm J. Hospers;Herman P. Schaalma

  • Changes and Adaptations: How University Students Self-Regulate Their Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Felicitas Biwer;Wisnu Wiradhany;Mirjam Oude Egbrink;Harm Hospers

  • "Serosorting" in casual anal sex of HIV-negative gay men is noteworthy and is increasing in Sydney, Australia.

    Limin Mao;June M Crawford;Harm J Hospers;Garrett P Prestage

  • Adding cognitive therapy to dietetic treatment is associated with less relapse in obesity.

    Marieke Q. Werrij;Anita Jansen;Sandra Mulkens;Hermien J. Elgersma

  • Stigma, disclosure, coping, and medication adherence among people living with HIV/AIDS in Northern Tanzania.

    Ramsey A Lyimo;Sarah E Stutterheim;Harm J Hospers;Teuntje de Glee

  • Theory- and evidence-based intervention to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected patients in the Netherlands: a pilot study.

    M. de Bruin;H.J. Hospers;H.W. van den Borne;G.J. Kok

  • A new meeting place: chatting on the Internet, e-dating and sexual risk behaviour among Dutch men who have sex with men

    Harm J Hospers;Gerjo Kok;Paul Harterink;Onno de Zwart

  • Self-regulatory processes mediate the intention-behavior relation for adherence and exercise behaviors.

    Marijn de Bruin;Paschal Sheeran;Gerjo Kok;Anneke Hiemstra

  • Overweight and obesity: the significance of a depressed mood.

    Marieke Q. Werrij;Sandra Mulkens;Harm J. Hospers;Anita Jansen

  • A comparison between a cognitive and a behavioral treatment for obese binge eaters and obese non-binge eaters

    Helga Nauta;Harm Hospers;Gerjo Kok;Anita Jansen

  • Internalised homonegativity predicts HIV-associated risk behavior in European men who have sex with men in a 38-country cross-sectional study : some public health implications of homophobia

    Michael W Ross;Michael W Ross;Rigmor C Berg;Axel J Schmidt;Harm J Hospers

  • Determinants of safe and risk-taking sexual behavior among gay men: a review.

    H J Hospers;G Kok

  • Electronic monitoring-based counseling to enhance adherence among HIV-infected patients: a randomized controlled trial.

    Marijn de Bruin;Harm J. Hospers;Gerard J. P. van Breukelen;Gerjo Kok

  • The European Men-Who-Have-Sex-With-Men Internet Survey (EMIS): Design and Methods

    Peter Weatherburn;Axel J. Schmidt;Ford Hickson;David Reid

  • Chatters on the Internet: a special target group for HIV prevention.

    H. J. Hospers;P. Harterink;K. van den Hoek;J. Veenstra

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerjo Kok
Gerjo Kok Maastricht University
Anita Jansen
Anita Jansen Maastricht University
Herman P. Schaalma
Herman P. Schaalma Maastricht University
Gerard J. P. van Breukelen
Gerard J. P. van Breukelen Maastricht University
Peter Weatherburn
Peter Weatherburn London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Sandra Mulkens
Sandra Mulkens Maastricht University
Michael W. Ross
Michael W. Ross University of Minnesota
Jan M. Prins
Jan M. Prins University of Amsterdam
Celette Sugg Skinner
Celette Sugg Skinner The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities online opens up a range of flexible degree and career options in the USA. Many students seek programs that allow them to graduate quickly or study while working. For example, 1 year masters programs are an excellent way to fast-track your qualifications for leadership and specialized roles.

Similarly, if you're looking to finish your undergraduate studies faster, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online provide a condensed, intensive pathway to earn your credential. These programs attract students motivated to quickly enter the workforce or move on to advanced study.

Cost is another key factor. If social work interests you, some of the cheapest online msw programs offer affordable routes to meaningful, in-demand careers. Likewise, those aiming for roles in behavior analysis can pursue an accelerated bcba program online to gain vital skills while maintaining flexibility.

These online pathways help students balance their educational, career, and personal goals—making higher education in Social Sciences and Humanities more accessible and practical than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Harm J. Hospers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles