World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Gordon M. Redding publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon M. Redding sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gordon M. Redding D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon M. Redding sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gordon M. Redding was affiliated with Illinois State University in the United States during their academic career. The focus of their work spanned several research areas, though specific fields of study or main topics of their research are not documented in the available data.

Throughout their career, Redding did not have listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, or noted frequent publication venues according to the accessible records.

No information is provided about book publications or awards won by this scholar. The lack of detailed publication or research topics in the records suggests that either the data is incomplete or that the scholar's documented output is limited in currently accessible academic databases.

Redding was recorded as deceased. The absence of detailed content prevents a deeper understanding of their contributions, but their association with Illinois State University situates their academic activity historically within that institution.

Best Publications

  • Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method

    Gordon M. Redding;Yves Rossetti;Benjamin Wallace

  • Prism adaptation and unilateral neglect: review and analysis.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Generalization of prism adaptation

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Strategic calibration and spatial alignment: a model from prism adaptation.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Adaptive coordination and alignment of eye and hand.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Stroop Effect: Interference and Facilitation with Verbal and Manual Responses:

    Gordon M. Redding;Deborah A. Gerjets

  • Additivity in adaptation to optical tilt

    Gordon M. Redding

  • Effects of Pointing Rate and Availability of Visual Feedback on Visual and Proprioceptive Components of Prism Adaptation.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Attention and prism adaptation.

    Gordon M Redding;Steven E Clark;Benjamin Wallace

  • Adaptive mechanisms in perceptual-motor coordination: components of prism adaptation.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Cognitive Load and Prism Adaptation.

    Gordon M. Redding;Stephen D. Rader;Donald R. Lucas

  • Prism exposure aftereffects and direct effects for different movement and feedback times.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Additivity in prism adaptation as manifested in intermanual and interocular transfer

    Benjamin Wallace;Gordon M. Redding

  • Cognitive interference in prism adaptation.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Effects of movement duration and visual feedback on visual and proprioceptive components of prism adaptation.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Intermanual transfer of prism adaptation.

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Dual Prism Adaptation: Calibration or Alignment?

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Chapter 5 Adaptive Eye-Hand Coordination: Implications of Prism Adaptation for Perceptual-Motor Organization

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

  • Perceptual-motor coordination and adaptation during locomotion: Determinants of prism adaptation in hall exposure

    Gordon M. Redding;Benjamin Wallace

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves Rossetti
Yves Rossetti Lyon Neuroscience Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degree programs and promising career pathways. Many students opt for specialized graduate programs, such as counseling or clinical psychology, to gain the credentials required for licensure and professional practice.

Each state in the U.S. has its own requirements for becoming a licensed mental health counselor. For example, you can learn about the mental health counselor requirements in Laredo or explore what it takes to become a mental health counselor in Las Vegas. Those interested in pursuing this profession in Kentucky can find guidance on how to become a mental health counselor in Lexington. Additionally, information is available about mental health counselor requirements in Lincoln.

Online psychology degrees allow for flexibility in learning and can prepare you for roles in counseling, research, or applied psychology. It’s important to research the educational requirements and licensure in your preferred state to ensure a smooth pathway to your desired career.

Best Scientists Citing Gordon M. Redding

Recently Published Articles