World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Glenda MacQueen

Glenda MacQueen

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
43093
World Ranking
10700
National Ranking
426

Glenda MacQueen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenda MacQueen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 354 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Glenda MacQueen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenda MacQueen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glenda MacQueen was affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada and contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology. Their main research domains included Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Pharmacology.

The scientist's work focused on several key research topics, such as:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Tryptophan and Brain Disorders

Glenda MacQueen published multiple papers, including the following recent works:

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Multisite Comparison of MRI Defacing Software Across Multiple Cohorts, 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Clinical, behavioral, and neural measures of reward processing correlate with escitalopram response in depression: a Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND-1) Report, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Childhood trauma and amygdala nuclei volumes in youth at risk for mental illness, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • Metabolomic signatures associated with depression and predictors of antidepressant response in humans: A CAN-BIND-1 report, 2021, Communications Biology

Throughout their career, Glenda MacQueen frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Sidney H. Kennedy
  • Raymond W. Lam
  • Benício N. Frey
  • Roumen Milev
  • Stefanie Hassel

The scientist published in a range of venues, with notable frequency in:

  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Translational Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Course of illness, hippocampal function, and hippocampal volume in major depression

    Glenda M. MacQueen;Stephanie Campbell;Bruce S. McEwen;Kathryn Macdonald

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder

    Lakshmi N Yatham;Sidney H Kennedy;Sagar V Parikh;Ayal Schaffer

  • Increased hippocampal BDNF immunoreactivity in subjects treated with antidepressant medication.

    Biao Chen;Dar Dowlatshahi;Glenda M MacQueen;Jun-Feng Wang

  • Lower Hippocampal Volume in Patients Suffering From Depression: A Meta-Analysis

    Stephanie Campbell;Michael Marriott;Claude Nahmias;Glenda M. MacQueen

  • Cortical abnormalities in adults and adolescents with major depression based on brain scans from 20 cohorts worldwide in the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder Working Group.

    L Schmaal;D P Hibar;P G Sämann;G B Hall

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder Section 3. Pharmacological Treatments

    Sidney H. Kennedy;Raymond W. Lam;Roger S. McIntyre;S. Valérie Tourjman

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2013.

    Lakshmi N. Yatham;Sidney H. Kennedy;Sagar V. Parikh;Ayal Schaffer

  • Bacterial infection causes stress-induced memory dysfunction in mice

    Mélanie G Gareau;Eytan Wine;Eytan Wine;David M Rodrigues;Joon Ho Cho

  • The role of the hippocampus in the pathophysiology of major depression.

    Stephanie Campbell;Glenda MacQueen

  • A meta-analysis examining clinical predictors of hippocampal volume in patients with major depressive disorder.

    Margaret C. McKinnon;Kaan Yucel;Anthony Nazarov;Glenda M. MacQueen

  • The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data

    Paul M. Thompson;Jason L. Stein;Sarah E. Medland;Derrek P. Hibar

  • The International Society for bipolar Disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders

    Isabella Pacchiarotti;David J. Bond;Ross J. Baldessarini;Willem A. Nolen

  • The hippocampus in major depression: evidence for the convergence of the bench and bedside in psychiatric research?

    G MacQueen;T Frodl

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2009.

    Lakshmi N Yatham;Sidney H Kennedy;Ayal Schaffer;Sagar V Parikh

  • Antidepressant Monotherapy vs Sequential Pharmacotherapy and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, or Placebo, for Relapse Prophylaxis in Recurrent Depression

    Zindel V. Segal;Peter Bieling;Trevor Young;Glenda MacQueen

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 2. Psychological Treatments

    Sagar V. Parikh;Sagar V. Parikh;Lena C. Quilty;Paula Ravitz;Michael Rosenbluth

  • Probiotic treatment of rat pups normalises corticosterone release and ameliorates colonic dysfunction induced by maternal separation

    Mélanie G Gareau;Jennifer Jury;Glenda MacQueen;Philip M Sherman

  • Neonatal Outcomes in Women With Untreated Antenatal Depression Compared With Women Without Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Alexander Jarde;Michelle Morais;Dawn Kingston;Rebecca Giallo

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: consensus and controversies.

    Lakshmi N Yatham;Sidney H Kennedy;Claire O'Donovan;Sagar Parikh

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    L. Schmaal;D.J. Veltman;T.G.M. van Erp;P.G. Sämann

Frequent Co-Authors

Sidney H. Kennedy
Sidney H. Kennedy University Health Network
Martin Alda
Martin Alda Dalhousie University
L. Trevor Young
L. Trevor Young University of Toronto
Roumen Milev
Roumen Milev Queen's University
Geoffrey B. Hall
Geoffrey B. Hall McMaster University
Raymond W. Lam
Raymond W. Lam University of British Columbia
Sagar V. Parikh
Sagar V. Parikh University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Margaret C. McKinnon
Margaret C. McKinnon McMaster University
Catherine Lebel
Catherine Lebel University of Calgary
Jean Addington
Jean Addington University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary career paths can be an excellent option for those interested in healthcare beyond traditional medical programs. Many students now seek out flexible online healthcare degrees to advance or switch careers while balancing work and personal commitments.

If you are interested in mental health, pursuing the fastest psych np program online can lead to becoming a Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner—a high-demand specialty in today’s healthcare landscape. For those aiming at healthcare leadership, earning an online healthcare administration degree can open doors to managerial roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Students looking to maximize affordability and return on investment may want to research the most affordable mha online or the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs. These pathways allow healthcare professionals to level up their credentials and career prospects while minimizing student debt.

Whether your interests lie in clinical practice, mental health, or healthcare management, these online programs offer flexible, respected options to achieve your goals in the dynamic U.S. healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Glenda MacQueen

Recently Published Articles