| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 46 | 2715 | 117 | 237 | 7601 |
The chart shows the history of publications by George Fedak between 1965 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. George Fedak published across 60 years, from 1965 to 2024, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2019. 2 of the 250 publications appeared in the last two years.
250 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1965 | 1 |
| 1966 | 1 |
| 1967 | 0 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 1 |
| 1970 | 3 |
| 1971 | 2 |
| 1972 | 3 |
| 1973 | 2 |
| 1974 | 1 |
| 1975 | 4 |
| 1976 | 1 |
| 1977 | 6 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 2 |
| 1980 | 9 |
| 1981 | 3 |
| 1982 | 4 |
| 1983 | 2 |
| 1984 | 3 |
| 1985 | 11 |
| 1986 | 11 |
| 1987 | 7 |
| 1988 | 3 |
| 1989 | 7 |
| 1990 | 4 |
| 1991 | 4 |
| 1992 | 4 |
| 1993 | 5 |
| 1994 | 3 |
| 1995 | 2 |
| 1996 | 2 |
| 1997 | 5 |
| 1998 | 2 |
| 1999 | 4 |
| 2000 | 6 |
| 2001 | 4 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 6 |
| 2004 | 7 |
| 2005 | 6 |
| 2006 | 3 |
| 2007 | 3 |
| 2008 | 11 |
| 2009 | 6 |
| 2010 | 5 |
| 2011 | 4 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2 |
| 2014 | 3 |
| 2015 | 4 |
| 2016 | 5 |
| 2017 | 6 |
| 2018 | 5 |
| 2019 | 12 |
| 2020 | 8 |
| 2021 | 5 |
| 2022 | 12 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| Total | 250 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Fedak sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 237 publications — 85th percentile
85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | |
| 106–110 | 247 | |
| 111–115 | 255 | |
| 116–120 | 253 | |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | 237 |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Fedak sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 46 D-Index — 60th percentile
60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | |
| 46 | 158 | 46 |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
Greg A. Penner;Aria Bush;Roger Wise;Won Kim
Daryl J Somers;George Fedak;Marc Savard
R. R-C. Wang;R. von Bothmer;J. Dvorak;G. Fedak
Fangpu Han;Fangpu Han;Bao Liu;George Fedak;Zhaohui Liu
L. S. O'Donoughue;M. E. Sorrells;S. D. Tanksley;E. Autrique
F. L. Kolb;G. H. Bai;G. J. Muehlbauer;J. A. Anderson
Fangpu Han;George Fedak;Wanli Guo;Bao Liu
Unknown
Daryl J. SomersD.J. Somers;George FedakG. Fedak;John ClarkeJ. Clarke;Wenguang CaoW. Cao
C. A. McCartney;D. J. Somers;G. Fedak;R. M. DePauw
Z. L. Liu;F. P. Han;M. Tan;X. H. Shan
Charlene P Wight;Nicholas A Tinker;Shahryar F Kianian;Mark E Sorrells
A.G. Hue;H.D. Voldeng;M.E. Savard;G. Fedak
C. A. McCartney;D. J. Somers;G. Fedak;W. Cao
F P Han;G Fedak;T Ouellet;B Liu
Z.P. Yang;J. Gilbert;D.J. Somers;G. Fedak
D. L. De Koeyer;N. A. Tinker;C. P. Wight;J. Deyl
F P Han;G Fedak;A Benabdelmouna;K Armstrong
H. Buerstmayr;M. Lemmens;G. Fedak;P. Ruckenbauer
S. Shea Miller;Denise M.P. Chabot;Thérèse Ouellet;Linda J Harris
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.