World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
4493
World Ranking
2864
National Ranking
14

Frederik Zahle publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederik Zahle sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 130 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Frederik Zahle D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederik Zahle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • IEA Wind TCP Task 37: Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Turbine

    Unknown

  • The DTU 10-MW Reference Wind Turbine

    Unknown

  • Wind turbine rotor-tower interaction using an incompressible overset grid method

    Frederik Zahle;Niels N. Sørensen;Jeppe Johansen

  • IEA Wind TCP Task 37: Systems Engineering in Wind Energy - WP2.1 Reference Wind Turbines

    Unknown

  • Implementation of the blade element momentum model on a polar grid and its aeroelastic load impact

    Helge Aagaard Madsen;Torben Juul Larsen;Georg Raimund Pirrung;Ang Li

  • Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Turbine

    Unknown

  • CFD simulations of the MEXICO rotor

    Andreas Bechmann;Niels N. Sørensen;Frederik Zahle

  • Verification and validation of an actuator disc model

    Pierre-Elouan Réthoré;Paul van der Laan;Niels Troldborg;Frederik Zahle

  • Blade element momentum modeling of inflow with shear in comparison with advanced model results

    Unknown

  • Comparison of wind turbine wake properties in non‐sheared inflow predicted by different computational fluid dynamics rotor models

    Niels Troldborg;Frederik Zahle;Pierre-Elouan Réthoré;Niels N. Sørensen

  • Characterization of the unsteady flow in the nacelle region of a modern wind turbine

    Frederik Zahle;Niels N. Sørensen

  • Light Rotor: The 10-MW reference wind turbine

    Unknown

  • 3D CFD computations of transitional flows using DES and a correlation based transition model

    Niels N. Sørensen;Andreas Bechmann;Frederik Zahle

  • Definition of the IEA Wind 22-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Turbine

    Unknown

  • Vortex‐induced vibrations on a modern wind turbine blade

    Joachim Christian Heinz;Niels N. Sørensen;Frederik Zahle;Witold Robert Skrzypinski

  • Fluid–structure interaction computations for geometrically resolved rotor simulations using CFD

    Joachim Christian Heinz;Niels N. Sørensen;Frederik Zahle

  • Multipoint high-fidelity CFD-based aerodynamic shape optimization of a 10 MW wind turbine

    Mads H. Aa. Madsen;Frederik Zahle;Niels N. Sørensen;Joaquim R. R. A. Martins

  • Vortex induced vibrations of wind turbine blades: Influence of the tip geometry

    S. G. Horcas;T. Barlas;F. Zahle;N. N. Sørensen

  • Prediction of the Effect of Vortex Generators on Airfoil Performance

    Niels N. Sørensen;Frederik Zahle;Christian Bak;T. Vronsky

  • CFD computations of the second round of MEXICO rotor measurements

    Niels N. Sørensen;Frederik Zahle;K. Boorsma;G. Schepers

Frequent Co-Authors

Niels N. Sørensen
Niels N. Sørensen Technical University of Denmark
Helge Aagaard Madsen
Helge Aagaard Madsen Technical University of Denmark
Morten Hartvig Hansen
Morten Hartvig Hansen University of Southern Denmark
Andrew Ning
Andrew Ning Brigham Young University
Eduard Egusquiza
Eduard Egusquiza Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Dan S. Henningson
Dan S. Henningson Royal Institute of Technology
Julia S. Johansen
Julia S. Johansen Copenhagen University Hospital
Carlo L. Bottasso
Carlo L. Bottasso Technical University of Munich
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, related fields offer diverse career opportunities. Online degrees provide flexible learning options, making it easier to balance education with professional or personal commitments. For veterans, specialized programs like speech pathology programs online for veterans can be particularly beneficial, offering tailored support and resources.

Accelerated pathways also exist for students looking to fast-track their education. For instance, an accelerated SLP master's program enables learners to quickly gain credentials and enter the workforce.

Beyond engineering, interdisciplinary roles such as criminal profiling are an intriguing option. Learning how to become a criminal profiler involves specialized education and training, often requiring a blend of psychology and law enforcement knowledge.

Additionally, exploring types of therapy degrees can open pathways into mental health and counseling careers, complementing technical skills with human-centered expertise. These varied programs highlight the value of multidisciplinary education in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Frederik Zahle

Recently Published Articles