World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert Flemming Mikkelsen

Robert Flemming Mikkelsen

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
34
Citations
6234
World Ranking
9157
National Ranking
102

Robert Flemming Mikkelsen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Flemming Mikkelsen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 175 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Robert Flemming Mikkelsen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Flemming Mikkelsen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Flemming Mikkelsen is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark in Denmark, with a research focus primarily in Engineering. Their work spans several related subfields including Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering, Ocean Engineering, and Global and Planetary Change.

The research topics covered by Mikkelsen include Wind Energy Research and Development, Wind and Air Flow Studies, Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research, Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis, Wave and Wind Energy Systems, Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics, and Icing and De-icing Technologies.

Mikkelsen has contributed to a number of scientific publications. Included among the recent papers are:

  • UNAFLOW: a holistic wind tunnel experiment about the aerodynamic response of floating wind turbines under imposed surge motion (2021) published in Wind Energy Science
  • Experimental analysis of the scaled DTU10MW TLP floating wind turbine with different control strategies (2020) published in Renewable Energy
  • A Quantitative Comparison of Aeroelastic Computations using Flex5 and Actuator Methods in LES (2021) published in Journal of Physics Conference Series
  • UNAFLOW: UNsteady Aerodynamics of FLOating Wind turbines (2021) published in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Wind tunnel testing of a swept tip shape and comparison with multi-fidelity aerodynamic simulations (2021) published in Wind Energy Science

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Mikkelsen include Anders Smærup Olsen, Mac Gaunaa, Christian Bak, Andreas Fischer, and Alessandro Fontanella.

The venues where Mikkelsen's research has frequently appeared are:

  • Journal of Physics Conference Series
  • Wind Energy Science
  • Renewable Energy
  • Marine Structures
  • Energy

Best Publications

  • Actuator Disc Methods Applied to Wind Turbines

    Robert Flemming Mikkelsen

  • Tip loss corrections for wind turbine computations

    Wen Zhong Shen;Robert Mikkelsen;Jens Nørkær Sørensen;Christian Bak

  • Numerical simulations of wake characteristics of a wind turbine in uniform inflow

    Niels Troldborg;Jens Nørkær Sørensen;Robert Flemming Mikkelsen

  • Actuator Line Simulation of Wake of Wind Turbine Operating in Turbulent Inflow

    Niels Troldborg;Jens Nørkær Sørensen;Robert Flemming Mikkelsen

  • Simulation of wind turbine wakes using the actuator line technique

    Jens Nørkær Sørensen;Robert Flemming Mikkelsen;Dan S. Henningson;Stefan Ivanell

  • A simple atmospheric boundary layer model applied to large eddy simulations of wind turbine wakes

    Niels Troldborg;Jens Nørkær Sørensen;Robert Flemming Mikkelsen;Niels N. Sørensen

  • Stability analysis of the tip vortices of a wind turbine

    Stefan Ivanell;Robert Mikkelsen;Jens N. Sørensen;Dan Henningson

  • Numerical simulations of wake interaction between two wind turbines at various inflow conditions

    Niels Troldborg;Gunner Chr. Larsen;Helge Aagaard Madsen;Kurt Schaldemose Hansen

  • Mutual inductance instability of the tip vortices behind a wind turbine

    Sasan Sarmast;Reza Dadfar;Robert Flemming Mikkelsen;Philipp Schlatter

  • Dynamic wake meandering modeling

    Gunner Chr. Larsen;Helge Madsen Aagaard;Ferhat Bingöl;Jakob Mann

  • Calibration and Validation of the Dynamic Wake Meandering Model for Implementation in an Aeroelastic Code

    H. Aa. Madsen;G. C. Larsen;T. J. Larsen;N. Troldborg

  • Large-eddy simulations of the Lillgrund wind farm

    Karl Nilsson;Karl Nilsson;Stefan Ivanell;Stefan Ivanell;Kurt Schaldemose Hansen;Robert Flemming Mikkelsen

  • Tip Loss Correction for Actuator/Navier–Stokes Computations

    Wen Zhong Shen;Jens Nørkær Sørensen;Robert Flemming Mikkelsen

  • Analysis of numerically generated wake structures

    Stefan Ivanell;Jens N. Sørensen;Robert Mikkelsen;Dan Henningson

  • Validation and modification of the Blade Element Momentum theory based on comparisons with actuator disc simulations

    Helge Aagaard Madsen;Christian Bak;Mads Døssing;Robert Flemming Mikkelsen

  • Analysis of Power Enhancement for a Row of Wind Turbines Using the Actuator Line Technique

    Robert Flemming Mikkelsen;Jens Nørkær Sørensen;Stig Øye;Niels Troldborg

  • A regular Strouhal number for large-scale instability in the far wake of a rotor

    Valery Okulov;Igor V. Naumov;Robert Flemming Mikkelsen;Ivan K. Kabardin

  • Modelling and analysis of the flow field around a coned rotor

    Robert Flemming Mikkelsen;Jens Nørkær Sørensen;Wen Zhong Shen

  • A Detailed investigation of the Blade Element Momentum (BEM) model based on analytical and numerical results and proposal for modifications of the BEM model

    H Aa Madsen;R Mikkelsen;S Øye;C Bak

  • The Triple Spar campaign: Model tests of a 10MW floating wind turbine with waves, wind and pitch control

    Henrik Bredmose;F. Lemmer;Michael Borg Borg;Antonio Manuel Pegalajar-Jurado

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens Nørkær Sørensen
Jens Nørkær Sørensen Technical University of Denmark
Dan S. Henningson
Dan S. Henningson Royal Institute of Technology
Wen Zhong Shen
Wen Zhong Shen Yangzhou University
Gunner Chr. Larsen
Gunner Chr. Larsen Technical University of Denmark
Philipp Schlatter
Philipp Schlatter Royal Institute of Technology
Niels N. Sørensen
Niels N. Sørensen Technical University of Denmark
Helge Aagaard Madsen
Helge Aagaard Madsen Technical University of Denmark
Julia S. Johansen
Julia S. Johansen Copenhagen University Hospital
Jakob Mann
Jakob Mann Technical University of Denmark
Charles Meneveau
Charles Meneveau Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities related to Engineering and Technology. Many students opt for the cheapest online masters in project management to gain leadership skills and boost their earning potential. With flexible online options, acquiring specialist management knowledge has never been more accessible.

Another in-demand pathway is real estate. Earning an online degree real estate is increasingly popular for those interested in property management, sales, or development, often pairing well with engineering or tech backgrounds.

For those intrigued by the intersection of technology and design, a ux degree online can lead to roles in user experience and interface design. These digital careers are highly relevant for tech-savvy graduates seeking creative challenges.

Lastly, research shows that obtaining a project management degree salary can significantly increase, making it a rewarding long-term investment. Online programs offer flexibility—allowing working professionals to balance studies and career growth in the engineering and tech sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Flemming Mikkelsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles