World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
12995
World Ranking
2622
National Ranking
173

Frank Preusker publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Preusker sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 394 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Frank Preusker D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Preusker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Preusker is affiliated with the German Aerospace Center in Germany. Their research primarily falls within the field of Physics and Astronomy, with a focus on Astronomy and Astrophysics as well as related subfields such as Atmospheric Science and Ecology.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology

Frequent venues where Frank Preusker has published include:

  • Space Science Reviews
  • Icarus
  • Science Advances
  • Nature
  • Nature Communications

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • The Mars 2020 Perseverance Rover Mast Camera Zoom (Mastcam-Z) Multispectral, Stereoscopic Imaging Investigation, 2021, Space Science Reviews
  • Geological, multispectral, and meteorological imaging results from the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover in Jezero crater, 2022, Science Advances
  • A contact binary satellite of the asteroid (152830) Dinkinesh, 2024, Nature
  • Mid-infrared emissivity of partially dehydrated asteroid (162173) Ryugu shows strong signs of aqueous alteration, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Surface roughness of asteroid (162173) Ryugu and comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko inferred from in situ observations, 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Frank Preusker has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • R. Jaumann
  • J. F. Bell
  • Nicole Schmitz
  • Katharina A. Otto
  • G. Mehall

Best Publications

  • Dawn at Vesta: Testing the Protoplanetary Paradigm

    C. T. Russell;C. A. Raymond;A. Coradini;H. Y. McSween

  • On the nucleus structure and activity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

    Holger Sierks;Cesare Barbieri;Philippe L. Lamy;Rafael Rodrigo;Rafael Rodrigo

  • The morphological diversity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

    Nicolas Thomas;Holger Sierks;Cesare Barbieri;Philippe L. Lamy

  • A homogeneous nucleus for comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from its gravity field

    M Pätzold;T. Andert;Matthias Hahn;S.W. Asmar

  • Vesta’s Shape and Morphology

    R. Jaumann;R. Jaumann;David Williams;D. L. Buczkowski;R. A. Yingst

  • The Violent Collisional History of Asteroid 4 Vesta

    S. Marchi;H.Y. McSween;David P O'Brien;P. Schenk

  • Shape model, reference system definition, and cartographic mapping standards for comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko Stereo-photogrammetric analysis of Rosetta/OSIRIS image data

    Frank Preusker;F. Scholten;K.-D. Matz;Thomas Roatsch

  • Properties of the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko interior revealed by CONSERT radar

    Wlodek Kofman;Alain Herique;Yves Barbin;Jean Pierre Barriot

  • Insolation, erosion, and morphology of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

    H. U. Keller;S. Mottola;B. Davidsson;S.E. Schröder

  • Dawn Arrives at Ceres: Exploration of a Small Volatile-Rich World

    C. T. Russell;C. A. Raymond;E. Ammannito;D. L. Buczkowski

  • The Geologically Recent Giant Impact Basins at Vesta’s South Pole

    Paul Schenk;David P. O’Brien;Simone Marchi;Robert Gaskell

  • A partially differentiated interior for (1) Ceres deduced from its gravity field and shape

    R.S. Park;A.S. Konopliv;B.G. Bills;N. Rambaux

  • Images of Asteroid 21 Lutetia: A Remnant Planetesimal from the Early Solar System

    H. Sierks;P. Lamy;Cesare Barbieri;D. Koschny

  • Cryovolcanism on Ceres

    O. Ruesch;Thomas Platz;P. Schenk;L.A. McFadden

  • Large heterogeneities in comet 67P as revealed by active pits from sinkhole collapse

    Jean-Baptiste Vincent;Dennis Bodewits;Sebastien Besse;Holger Sierks

  • Redistribution of particles across the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

    N. Thomas;B. Davidsson;M. R. El-Maarry;S. Fornasier

  • Regional surface morphology of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta/OSIRIS images

    M. R. El-Maarry;N. Thomas;L. Giacomini;M. Massironi

  • Two independent and primitive envelopes of the bilobate nucleus of comet 67P

    Matteo Massironi;Emanuele Simioni;Francesco Marzari;Gabriele Cremonese

  • Topography of Mars from global mapping by HRSC high-resolution digital terrain models and orthoimages: Characteristics and performance

    K. Gwinner;F. Scholten;Frank Preusker;S. Elgner

  • Cratering on Ceres: Implications for its crust and evolution

    H. Hiesinger;S Marchi;N. Schmedemann;P. Schenk

  • Hollows on Mercury: MESSENGER Evidence for Geologically Recent Volatile-Related Activity

    David T. Blewett;Nancy L. Chabot;Brett W. Denevi;Carolyn M. Ernst

  • Composition and structure of the shallow subsurface of Ceres revealed by crater morphology

    Michael T T. Bland;Carol A A. Raymond;Paul M M. Schenk;Roger R R. Fu

  • Gravitational slopes, geomorphology, and material strengths of the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from OSIRIS observations

    O. Groussin;L. Jorda;A.-T. Auger;Ekkehard Kührt

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Jaumann
Ralf Jaumann Freie Universität Berlin
Christopher T. Russell
Christopher T. Russell University of California, Los Angeles
Frank Scholten
Frank Scholten German Aerospace Center
Andreas Nathues
Andreas Nathues Max Planck Society
Paul M. Schenk
Paul M. Schenk Lunar and Planetary Institute
Laurent Jorda
Laurent Jorda Aix-Marseille University
M. C. De Sanctis
M. C. De Sanctis National Institute for Astrophysics
David A. Williams
David A. Williams University of California, Santa Cruz
Katrin Stephan
Katrin Stephan German Aerospace Center
Nicolas Thomas
Nicolas Thomas University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree related to Environmental Sciences can open doors to diverse career options in sustainability, policy, and community development. Many students consider complementary fields such as sociology, education, and social work to broaden their impact. For those interested in understanding social dynamics tied to environmental issues, exploring the best online bachelors in sociology programs can provide valuable insights and skills.

Educators looking to integrate environmental topics into teaching may find advanced degrees beneficial. Programs like the edd no dissertation option offer a flexible pathway to leadership roles without lengthy research commitments. Additionally, transitioning from a master's to doctoral level can be streamlined through best online eds to edd programs, enabling professionals to deepen expertise in education policy and administration.

For those focused on social justice and community health in environmental contexts, pursuing a Doctorate in Social Work is another strong option. The dsw online programs provide accessible routes to advanced practice and research, addressing systemic challenges linked to environmental inequities.

Choosing a complementary online degree aligned with Environmental Sciences enhances career flexibility and impact across various sectors. These programs support lifelong learning tailored to evolving professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Preusker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles