World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
17154
World Ranking
8364
National Ranking
4457

Frank M. Andrews publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank M. Andrews sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frank M. Andrews D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank M. Andrews sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank M. Andrews was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. During their career, they contributed to the academic community through research in various scientific domains.

Though specific papers, co-authors, and publication venues linked to Frank M. Andrews are not recorded here, their association with a major research university suggests engagement with rigorous academic activities.

No records of published books or recognized awards are listed for Frank M. Andrews. Additionally, no precise data on main fields, subfields, or main topics of study is available.

Frank M. Andrews has since passed away, and all descriptions of their work are referenced in past tense to reflect this status.

Best Publications

  • Social Indicators of Well-Being

    Frank M. Andrews;Stephen B. Withey

  • Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality

    Frank M. Andrews;Stephen Bassett Withey

  • Multiple classification analysis

    Frank M. Andrews

  • Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development

    Donald Campbell Pelz;Frank M. Andrews

  • Construct Validity and Error Components of Survey Measures: A Structural Modeling Approach

    Frank M. Andrews

  • Developing Measures of Perceived Life Quality: Results from Several National Surveys

    Frank M. Andrews;Stephen B. Withey

  • MEASURES OF SELF-REPORTED WELL-BEING: THEIR AFFECTIVE, COGNITIVE, AND OTHER COMPONENTS*

    Frank M. Andrews;Aubrey C. Mckennell

  • Modeling the psychological determinants of life quality

    Antonia Abbey;Antonia Abbey;Frank M. Andrews;Frank M. Andrews

  • Time Pressure and Performance of Scientists and Engineers; A Five-Year Panel Study

    Frank M. Andrews;George F. Farris

  • Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development

    Sam D. Sieber;Donald C. Pelz;Frank M. Andrews

  • Gender's Role in Responses to Infertility:

    Antonia Abbey;Frank M. Andrews;L. Jill Halrnan

  • Multiple Classification Analysis: A Report on a Computer Program for Multiple Regression Using Categorical Predictors

    Frank M. Andrews;James N. Morgan;John A. Sonquist

  • The validity of measures of self-reported well-being

    Frank M. Andrews;Rick Crandall

  • Research on the quality of life

    Frank M. Andrews

  • Detecting Causal Priorities in Panel Study Data

    Donald C. Pelz;Frank M. Andrews

  • Social indicators of perceived life quality

    Frank M. Andrews

  • Stress from infertility, marriage factors, and subjective well-being of wives and husbands.

    F M Andrews;A Abbey;L J Halman

  • SUPERVISORY PRACTICES AND INNOVATION IN SCIENTIFIC TEAMS

    Frank M. Andrews;George F. Farris

  • Evaluation of Measurement Instruments Using a Structural Modeling Approach

    Willem E. Saris;Frank M. Andrews

  • Is fertility-problem stress different? The dynamics of stress in fertile and infertile couples

    Frank M. Andrews;Frank M. Andrews;Antonia Abbey;Antonia Abbey;L. Jill Halman;L. Jill Halman

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonia Abbey
Antonia Abbey Wayne State University
Ronald Inglehart
Ronald Inglehart University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Willem E. Saris
Willem E. Saris Pompeu Fabra University
Willard L. Rodgers
Willard L. Rodgers University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kenneth C. Land
Kenneth C. Land Duke University
Jagdish N. Sheth
Jagdish N. Sheth Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a range of flexible learning options and diverse career paths. Many universities across the U.S. now offer accredited online programs that mirror the curriculum and rigor of traditional, on-campus degrees. Whether you're interested in clinical, counseling, industrial-organizational, or educational psychology, online programs cater to a variety of specialties and personal schedules.

Students can connect with some of the popular psychology programs in Oklahoma and the popular psychology programs in Orlando to find reputable online degree offerings. For those on the West Coast, the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Reno and a range of popular psychology programs in Seattle also provide outstanding choices.

Graduates from these online programs are well-prepared for roles in mental health services, academic research, human resources, and beyond. When choosing a pathway, consider each program's accreditation, faculty expertise, and connections to potential employers to maximize career opportunities in this rapidly growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Frank M. Andrews

Recently Published Articles