World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
33
Citations
6525
World Ranking
3006
National Ranking
1215

Eugene B. Fabes publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene B. Fabes sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 60 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Eugene B. Fabes D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene B. Fabes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eugene B. Fabes was affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their academic career focused on research and contributions within their field, although specific topics or subfields of study are not detailed in the available information.

Over the course of their career, they did not have a recorded list of recent papers or notable publication activities in particular venues. There is no available information regarding frequent co-authors or collaborative research partnerships.

The scientist did not have documented book publications or identified main fields and subfields of study accessible in the provided data. Likewise, there is no record of awards won during their career.

No specific topics of research work are listed, and no citation counts or publication metrics were provided that would outline the impact or scope of their academic output.

Best Publications

  • The local regularity of solutions of degenerate elliptic equations

    Eugene B. Fabes;Carlos E. Kenig;Raul P. Serapioni

  • A New Proof of Moser’s Parabolic Harnack Inequality Using the old Ideas of Nash

    E. B. Fabes;E. B. Fabes;Daniel W. Stroock;Daniel W. Stroock

  • Potential techniques for boundary value problems on C1-domains

    Unknown

  • The Dirichlet problem for the Stokes system on Lipschitz domains

    E. B. Fabes;C. E. Kenig;G. C. Verchota

  • The Wiener test for degenerate elliptic equations

    E. B. Fabes;D. S. Jerison;C. E. Kenig

  • Singular integrals with mixed homogeneity

    Unknown

  • Boundary Layers on Sobolev–Besov Spaces and Poisson's Equation for the Laplacian in Lipschitz Domains

    Eugene Fabes;Osvaldo Mendez;Marius Mitrea

  • The initial value problem for the Navier-Stokes equations with data in Lp

    Unknown

  • The $L^p$-integrability of Green’s functions and fundamental solutions for elliptic and parabolic equations

    Unknown

  • A backward Harnack inequality and Fatou theorem for nonnegative solutions of parabolic equations

    Eugene B. Fabes;Nicola Garofalo;Sandro Salsa

  • Harnack’s inequality for Schrödinger operators and the continuity of solutions

    F. Chiarenza;E. Fabes;N. Garofalo

  • Necessary and sufficient conditions for absolute continuity of elliptic-harmonic measure

    Eugene Barry Fabes;David S. Jerison;Carlos E. Kenig

  • On a regularity theorem for weak solutions to transmission problems with internal Lipschitz boundaries

    L. Escauriaza;E. B. Fabes;G. Verchota

  • Conditional gauge and potential theory for the Schrödinger operator

    Unknown

  • A New Proof of Moser's Parabolic Harnack Inequality via the Old Ideas of Nash

    Unknown

  • Behavior near the boundary of positive solutions of second order parabolic equations. II

    E. B. Fabes;M. V. Safonov;Y. U. Yuan;Y. U. Yuan

  • Fatou Theorems for Some Nonlinear Elliptic Equations.

    Eugene Fabes;Nicola Garofalo;Santiago Marin Malave;Sandro Salsa

  • The inverse conductivity problem with one measurement: uniqueness for convex polyhedra

    Bartolomé Barceló;Eugene Fabes;Jin Keun Seo

  • Examples of singular parabolic measures and singular transition probability densities

    Eugene B. Fabes;Carlos E. Kenig

  • Construction of inertial manifolds by elliptic regularization

    Eugene Fabes;Mitchell Luskin;George R Sell

  • Weak-type estimates for the Riesz transforms associated with the Gaussian measure.

    Eugene B. Fabes;Cristian E. Gutiérrez;Roberto Scotto

  • Multilinear Littlewood-Paley estimates with applications to partial differential equations.

    Eugene B. Fabes;David S. Jerison;Carlos E. Kenig

  • Estimates of caloric measure and the initial-Dirichlet problem for the heat equation in Lipschitz cylinders

    Eugene Fabes;Sandro Salsa

  • MULTILINEAR SQUARE FUNCTIONS AND PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

    Eugene B. Fabes;David S. Jerison;Carlos E. Kenig

  • Uniqueness in the dirichlet problem for some elliptic operators with discontinuous coefficients

    M. Cristina Cerutti;Luis Escauriaza;Eugene B. Fabes

  • Inverse conductivity problem with one measurement: error estimates and approximate identification for perturbed disks

    Eugene Fabes;Hyeonabae Kang;Jin Keun Seo

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicola Garofalo
Nicola Garofalo University of Padua
Carlos E. Kenig
Carlos E. Kenig University of Chicago
Luis Escauriaza
Luis Escauriaza University of the Basque Country
Jin Keun Seo
Jin Keun Seo Yonsei University
Marius Mitrea
Marius Mitrea Baylor University
George R. Sell
George R. Sell University of Minnesota
Giovanni Alessandrini
Giovanni Alessandrini University of Trieste
Fanghua Lin
Fanghua Lin Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Mitchell Luskin
Mitchell Luskin University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, expanding skills through related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals choose to complement their math background with an fastest mba online to quickly gain leadership and business skills while continuing their education without interrupting their careers.

Marketing and analytics are also popular fields where mathematical expertise is valuable. Pursuing an online marketing degree can provide insights into data-driven marketing strategies, enhancing employability in competitive job markets.

For those aiming to fast-track their education, the 1 year mba programs offer an intensive, focused curriculum that complements mathematical and analytical skills, often leading to advancement into management roles.

If you have previous credits or coursework, exploring online mba transfer credits can save time and money, making higher education more accessible and tailored to your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Eugene B. Fabes

Recently Published Articles