World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
40
Citations
5879
World Ranking
2079
National Ranking
883

Mitchell Luskin publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell Luskin sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 173 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Mitchell Luskin D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell Luskin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society For contributions to numerical analysis and applications to materials science.
  • 2014 - SIAM Fellow For contributions to multiscale numerical methods for materials with microstructure and defects and atomistic to continuum models.
  • 1989 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Mitchell Luskin is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Materials Science and Physics and Astronomy, with a substantial focus on subfields such as Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Mechanics of Materials.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Graphene research and applications
  • Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • 2D Materials and Applications
  • Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Thermal properties of materials
  • Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

Mitchell Luskin has published extensively in several venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B
  • Multiscale Modeling and Simulation
  • Physical Review Letters
  • Journal of Mathematical Physics

Some of the scientist's recent papers include:

  • "Twisted Trilayer Graphene: A Precisely Tunable Platform for Correlated Electrons," 2020, published in Physical Review Letters
  • "Correlated Insulating States and Transport Signature of Superconductivity in Twisted Trilayer Graphene Superlattices," 2021, published in Physical Review Letters
  • "Modeling mechanical relaxation in incommensurate trilayer van der Waals heterostructures," 2020, published in Physical Review B
  • "Mathematical aspects of the Kubo formula for electrical conductivity with dissipation," 2023, published in Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics
  • "Topological nature of dislocation networks in two-dimensional moiré materials," 2023, published in Physical Review B

Frequent co-authors in Luskin's collaborations include Alexander B. Watson, Efthimios Kaxiras, Ziyan Zhu, Daniel Massatt, and Kenji Watanabe.

The scientist has received recognition in the form of awards such as:

  • Fellow of the American Mathematical Society (2015) for contributions to numerical analysis and applications to materials science
  • SIAM Fellow (2014) for contributions to multiscale numerical methods for materials with microstructure and defects, and atomistic to continuum models
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1989)

Best Publications

  • Twistronics: Manipulating the Electronic Properties of Two-dimensional Layered Structures through their Twist Angle

    Stephen Carr;Daniel Massatt;Shiang Fang;Paul Cazeaux

  • Relaxation and domain formation in incommensurate two-dimensional heterostructures

    Stephen Carr;Daniel Massatt;Steven B. Torrisi;Paul Cazeaux

  • On the computation of crystalline microstructure

    Mitchell Luskin

  • Enhanced accuracy by post-processing for finite element methods for hyperbolic equations

    Bernardo Cockburn;Mitchell Luskin;Chi-Wang Shu;Endre Süli

  • On the Smoothing Property of the Galerkin Method for Parabolic Equations

    Mitchell Luskin;Rolf Rannacher

  • On the smoothing property of the crank-nicolson scheme

    Mitchell Luskin;Rolf Rannacher;Wolfgang Wendland

  • A mathematical formalization of the parallel replica dynamics

    Claude Le Bris;Tony Lelièvre;Mitchell Luskin;Danny Perez

  • The computation of the austenitic-martensitic phase transition

    Charles Collins;Mitchell Luskin

  • Atomistic-to-continuum coupling

    Mitchell Barry Luskin;Christoph Ortner

  • Numerical approximation of the solution of variational problem with a double well potential

    Charles Collins;David Kinderlehrer;Mitchell Luskin

  • Non-Ergodicity of the Nosé–Hoover Thermostatted Harmonic Oscillator

    Frédéric Legoll;Mitchell Luskin;Richard Moeckel

  • An Optimal Order Error Analysis of the One-Dimensional Quasicontinuum Approximation

    Matthew Dobson;Mitchell Luskin

  • THE EXISTENCE OF A GLOBAL WEAK SOLUTION TO THE NON-LINEAR WATERHAMMER PROBLEM

    Mitchell Luskin;Blake Temple

  • Analysis of a force-based quasicontinuum approximation

    Matthew Dobson;Mitchell Luskin

  • Construction of inertial manifolds by elliptic regularization

    Eugene Fabes;Mitchell Luskin;George R Sell

  • Optimal order error estimates for the finite element approximation of the solution of a nonconvex variational problem

    Charles Collins;Mitchell Luskin

  • A Galerkin Method for Nonlinear Parabolic Equations with Nonlinear Boundary Conditions

    Mitchell Luskin

  • Stability, Instability, and Error of the Force-based Quasicontinuum Approximation

    Matthew Dobson;Mitchell Barry Luskin;Christoph Ortner

  • Analysis of the finite element approximation of microstructure in micromagnetics

    Mitchell Luskin;Ling Ma

  • Analysis of a class of nonconforming finite elements for crystalline microstructures

    Peter Klouček;Bo Li;Mitchell Luskin

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Ortner
Christoph Ortner University of Warwick
Efthimios Kaxiras
Efthimios Kaxiras Harvard University
Ellad B. Tadmor
Ellad B. Tadmor University of Minnesota
Tony Low
Tony Low University of Minnesota
Pavel B. Bochev
Pavel B. Bochev Sandia National Laboratories
Philip Kim
Philip Kim Harvard University
Kenji Watanabe
Kenji Watanabe National Institute for Materials Science
George R. Sell
George R. Sell University of Minnesota
Gyu-Chul Yi
Gyu-Chul Yi Seoul National University
Takashi Taniguchi
Takashi Taniguchi National Institute for Materials Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mathematics opens doors to various dynamic career pathways, many of which intersect with fields like data analytics, business, and management. For those interested in leveraging mathematical skills in data-driven environments, exploring a masters in data analytics can provide specialized knowledge that is highly sought after in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology.

For students keen on developing leadership and business acumen alongside their analytical expertise, an MBA offers valuable opportunities. Many professionals opt for an easiest mba specialization to smoothly transition into managerial roles without compromising on quality education.

Additionally, the growing availability of flexible study options means candidates can earn their qualifications without disrupting their careers. The easiest mba online programs are particularly appealing for those looking for convenience and accessibility without sacrificing industry relevance.

For advanced professionals aiming at executive-level positions, online dba programs offer affordable paths to deepen strategic and research capabilities, making them an attractive option for those looking to combine mathematics with business leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Mitchell Luskin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles