World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
15225
World Ranking
13010
National Ranking
5545

Esmail D. Zanjani publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Esmail D. Zanjani sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 214 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Esmail D. Zanjani D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Esmail D. Zanjani sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Esmail D. Zanjani was affiliated with the University of Nevada Reno in the United States. Their professional career focused on academic research within this institution.

No published papers, co-authors, or recurring publication venues were listed in the available data, which limits specific details regarding their research output and collaborations.

The data does not include information on the scientist's main fields or subfields of study, nor the primary topics they focused on in their work. Similarly, there are no book publications or awards associated with their name in the provided information.

The profile confirms that Esmail D. Zanjani is deceased, and all references are presented in the past tense to reflect this status.

Best Publications

  • AC133, a Novel Marker for Human Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

    Amy H. Yin;Sheri Miraglia;Esmail D. Zanjani;Graca Almeida-Porada

  • A New Human Somatic Stem Cell from Placental Cord Blood with Intrinsic Pluripotent Differentiation Potential

    Gesine Kögler;Sandra Sensken;Judith A. Airey;Thorsten Trapp

  • KDR receptor: a key marker defining hematopoietic stem cells.

    B. L. Ziegler;M. Valtieri;M. Valtieri;G. Almeida Porada;R. De Maria;R. De Maria

  • Treatment of X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency by in Utero Transplantation of Paternal Bone Marrow

    Alan W. Flake;Maria Grazia Roncarolo;Jennifer M. Puck;Graza Almeida-Porada

  • Suppression of Erythroid-Colony Formation by Lymphocytes from Patients with Aplastic Anemia

    Ronald Hoffman;Esmail D. Zanjani;John D. Lutton;Ralph Zalusky

  • Cotransplantation of human stromal cell progenitors into preimmune fetal sheep results in early appearance of human donor cells in circulation and boosts cell levels in bone marrow at later time points after transplantation.

    Graça Almeida-Porada;Christopher D. Porada;Nam Tran;Esmail D. Zanjani

  • Engraftment and long-term expression of human fetal hemopoietic stem cells in sheep following transplantation in utero.

    E D Zanjani;M G Pallavicini;J L Ascensao;A W Flake

  • Adult Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Pluripotent Population with Multiple Applications

    Christopher D Porada;Esmail D Zanjani;Graça Almeida-Porad

  • In utero hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: ontogenic opportunities and biologic barriers.

    Alan W. Flake;Esmail D. Zanjani

  • Erythroid colony formation by polycythemia vera bone marrow in vitro. Dependence on erythropoietin.

    Esmail D. Zanjani;John D. Lutton;Ronald Hoffman;Louis R. Wasserman

  • Cotransplantation of stroma results in enhancement of engraftment and early expression of donor hematopoietic stem cells in utero.

    Graça Almeida-Porada;Alan W. Flake;Hudson A. Glimp;Esmail D. Zanjani

  • Prospects for in Utero Human Gene Therapy

    Esmail D. Zanjani;W. French Anderson

  • Anti-T-cell reagents for human bone marrow transplantation: ricin linked to three monoclonal antibodies

    Daniel A. Vallera;Robert C. Ash;Esmail D. Zanjani;John H. Kersey

  • Long-term repopulating ability of xenogeneic transplanted human fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells in sheep.

    E D Zanjani;A W Flake;H Rice;M Hedrick

  • Efficient generation of human hepatocytes by the intrahepatic delivery of clonal human mesenchymal stem cells in fetal sheep.

    Jason Chamberlain;Takashi Yamagami;Evan Colletti;Neil D. Theise

  • Formation of human hepatocytes by human hematopoietic stem cells in sheep.

    Graça Almeida-Porada;Christopher D. Porada;Jason Chamberlain;Ali Torabi

  • Umbilical cord blood cells capable of engrafting in primary, secondary, and tertiary xenogeneic hosts are preserved after ex vivo culture in a noncontact system

    Ian D. Lewis;Graca Almeida-Porada;Graca Almeida-Porada;Graca Almeida-Porada;Jingbo Du;Jingbo Du;Jingbo Du;Ihor R. Lemischka;Ihor R. Lemischka;Ihor R. Lemischka

  • Ex vivo expanded cord blood cells provide rapid engraftment in fetal sheep but lack long-term engrafting potential.

    Ian K McNiece;Graça Almeida-Porada;Elizabeth J Shpall;Esmail Zanjani

  • Human embryonic stem cell-derived hematopoietic cells are capable of engrafting primary as well as secondary fetal sheep recipients.

    A. Daisy Narayan;Jessica L. Chase;Rachel L. Lewis;Xinghui Tian

  • Persistence of human multilineage, self-renewing lymphohematopoietic stem cells in chimeric sheep.

    Edward F. Srour;Esmail D. Zanjani;Kenneth Cornetta;Christie M. Traycoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Graça Almeida-Porada
Graça Almeida-Porada Wake Forest University
Alan W. Flake
Alan W. Flake Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Stephen St. Jeor
Stephen St. Jeor University of Nevada Reno
Joaquim M. S. Cabral
Joaquim M. S. Cabral Instituto Superior Técnico
Makio Ogawa
Makio Ogawa Medical University of South Carolina
Paul J. Simmons
Paul J. Simmons The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Ronald Hoffman
Ronald Hoffman Mount Sinai Hospital
Anthony Atala
Anthony Atala Wake Forest University
W. French Anderson
W. French Anderson University of Southern California
Jonathan Kelley
Jonathan Kelley International Survey Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open the door to a wide range of healthcare careers—many of which now offer online degrees and training programs. For those interested in blending science with management, consider the cheapest online mba healthcare options. These programs provide business and leadership skills tailored to the healthcare industry, and are available at a fraction of the cost of traditional routes.

The surge in digital health records has increased demand for professionals who can accurately handle medical data. If you have a strong eye for detail and an interest in healthcare administration, look into becoming a certified coding specialist. Understanding the differences in certifications can point you toward more specialized roles and higher earning potential.

Curious about salaries in this field? Find out how much do medical coders make and compare remuneration across related job titles. If you’re wondering whether this path is right for you, explore the full medical coding job outlook, including pros, cons, and future growth. These pathways offer flexibility, growing job prospects, and are well-aligned with an education in Biology or Biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Esmail D. Zanjani

Recently Published Articles