World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
43
Citations
12250
World Ranking
19340
National Ranking
1320

Gesine Kögler publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gesine Kögler sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Gesine Kögler D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gesine Kögler sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gesine Kögler is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, focusing on multiple subfields including Immunology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Surgery, and Oncology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to stem cell biology and immune function. Major themes in their research include:

  • Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Kögler has contributed articles to several scientific journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Stem Cells Translational Medicine (8 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (3 publications)
  • Cytotherapy (3 publications)
  • Cells (2 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (2 publications)

Their recent papers include:

  • "Umbilical cord blood-derived ILC1-like cells constitute a novel precursor for mature KIR+NKG2A- NK cells," 2020, published in eLife
  • "Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Heterogeneity and Therapeutical Applications," 2023, published in Cells
  • "Transcriptional and functional characterization of neonatal circulating Innate Lymphoid Cells," 2021, published in Stem Cells Translational Medicine
  • "GMP-grade CD34+ selection from HLA-homozygous licensed cord blood units and short-term expansion under European ATMP regulations," 2020, published in Vox Sanguinis
  • "Functional omics analyses reveal only minor effects of microRNAs on human somatic stem cell differentiation," 2020, published in Scientific Reports

The following researchers have frequently co-authored publications with Kögler:

  • Katharina Raba (8 coauthored papers)
  • Ute Fischer (8 coauthored papers)
  • Rigveda Bhave (7 coauthored papers)
  • Vera H. Jepsen (6 coauthored papers)
  • Nadine Rüchel (6 coauthored papers)

Best Publications

  • Repair of Infarcted Myocardium by Autologous Intracoronary Mononuclear Bone Marrow Cell Transplantation in Humans

    Bodo E. Strauer;Michael Brehm;Tobias Zeus;Matthias Köstering

  • A New Human Somatic Stem Cell from Placental Cord Blood with Intrinsic Pluripotent Differentiation Potential

    Gesine Kögler;Sandra Sensken;Judith A. Airey;Thorsten Trapp

  • Regeneration of Human Infarcted Heart Muscle by Intracoronary Autologous Bone Marrow Cell Transplantation in Chronic Coronary Artery Disease: The IACT Study

    Bodo E. Strauer;Michael Brehm;Tobias Zeus;Thomas Bartsch

  • No Identical “Mesenchymal Stem Cells” at Different Times and Sites: Human Committed Progenitors of Distinct Origin and Differentiation Potential Are Incorporated as Adventitial Cells in Microvessels

    Benedetto Sacchetti;Alessia Funari;Cristina Remoli;Giuseppe Giannicola

  • Small molecules enable highly efficient neuronal conversion of human fibroblasts

    Julia Ladewig;Jerome Mertens;Jaideep Kesavan;Jonas Doerr

  • Oct4 and Its Pseudogenes Confuse Stem Cell Research.

    Stefanie Liedtke;Jürgen Enczmann;Simon Waclawczyk;Peter Wernet

  • KIR-ligand incompatibility in the graft-versus-host direction improves outcomes after umbilical cord blood transplantation for acute leukemia.

    R. Willemze;R. Willemze;C. A. Rodrigues;M. Labopin;G. Sanz

  • Oct4 expression revisited: potential pitfalls for data misinterpretation in stem cell research.

    Stefanie Liedtke;Milaid Stephan;Gesine Kögler

  • Cytokine production and hematopoiesis supporting activity of cord blood-derived unrestricted somatic stem cells.

    Gesine Kögler;Teja Falk Radke;Aurélie Lefort;Sandra Sensken

  • Segregation of lipid raft markers including CD133 in polarized human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

    Bernd Giebel;Denis Corbeil;Julia Beckmann;Johannes Höhn

  • Identification of cord blood dendritic cells as an immature CD11c- population.

    Rüdiger V. Sorg;Gesine Kögler;Peter Wernet

  • Transplantation of autologous mononuclear bone marrow stem cells in patients with peripheral arterial disease (The TAM-PAD study)

    Thomas Bartsch;Michael Brehm;Tobias Zeus;Gesine Kögler

  • Comparative generation and characterization of pluripotent unrestricted somatic stem cells with mesenchymal stem cells from human cord blood

    Gesine Kögler;Sandra Sensken;Peter Wernet

  • Functional Differences Between Mesenchymal Stem Cell Populations Are Reflected by Their Transcriptome

    Bastiaan J.H. Jansen;Christian Gilissen;Helene Roelofs;Aneta Schaap-Oziemlak

  • Significant clinical, neuropathological and behavioural recovery from acute spinal cord trauma by transplantation of a well-defined somatic stem cell from human umbilical cord blood

    Jessica Schira;Marcia Gasis;Veronica Estrada;Marion Hendricks

  • Distinct differentiation potential of "MSC" derived from cord blood and umbilical cord: are cord-derived cells true mesenchymal stromal cells?

    Julia Bosch;Amelie Pia Houben;Teja Falk Radke;Daniela Stapelkamp

  • Hematopoietic Transplant Potential of Unrelated Cord Blood: Critical Issues

    Gesine Kögler;Julio Callejas;Peter Hakenberg;Jürgen Enczmann

  • Cord blood comprises antigen-experienced T cells specific for maternal minor histocompatibility antigen HA-1.

    Bregje Mommaas;Janine A. Stegehuis-Kamp;Astrid G. van Halteren;Michel Kester

  • Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells from Human Umbilical Cord Blood Can be Differentiated into Neurons with a Dopaminergic Phenotype

    Susanne Greschat;Jessica Schira;Patrick Küry;Claudia Rosenbaum

  • FOCUS ISSUE: CARDIAC REGENERATION Regeneration of Human Infarcted Heart Muscle by Intracoronary Autologous Bone Marrow Cell Transplantation in Chronic Coronary Artery Disease The IACT Study

    Bodo E. Strauer;Michael Brehm;Tobias Zeus;Thomas Bartsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Wernet
Peter Wernet Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Eliane Gluckman
Eliane Gluckman Université Paris Cité
Vanderson Rocha
Vanderson Rocha Universidade de São Paulo
Michael A. Brehm
Michael A. Brehm University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Hans Werner Müller
Hans Werner Müller Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Yves Beguin
Yves Beguin University of Liège
Ruurd Torensma
Ruurd Torensma Radboud University
Carl G. Figdor
Carl G. Figdor Radboud University
Guillermo Sanz
Guillermo Sanz Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Bernd Giebel
Bernd Giebel University of Duisburg-Essen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to a variety of healthcare and science-related careers. For those looking for flexible and cost-effective ways to break into allied health professions, there are several online degree and certification options worth considering.

If you are eager to start working quickly, 1 year radiology tech programs online offer accelerated training in imaging technology—providing a fast track into hospital and clinical roles. Another vital field, Nutrition, is growing rapidly. To advance in this area, attending one of the best schools for masters in nutrition can elevate your expertise and open opportunities in healthcare, research, and public health.

For entry-level healthcare roles, there are numerous online medical assistant programs that accept financial aid, making the path more affordable. Additionally, medical assistants looking to take the next step can benefit from a medical assistant to lpn bridge program, which allows for a streamlined transition toward becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse.

Whether you’re just starting or seeking to specialize further, these online options support a wide range of career pathways stemming from core studies in Biology and Biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Gesine Kögler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles