World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
37023
World Ranking
11647
National Ranking
829

Bernd Giebel publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Giebel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 209 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bernd Giebel D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Giebel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernd Giebel is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant number of publications in medicine and related subfields.

The main areas of study in Giebel's work include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, the subfields of molecular biology, cancer research, genetics, immunology, and neurology are prominently represented in their scholarly output.

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research
  • Genetics
  • Immunology
  • Neurology

The scientist's research topics cover multiple, specific themes, particularly focused on extracellular vesicles and their roles in disease and cellular regulation.

  • Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Circular RNAs in diseases
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules Research

Key recent publications by Bernd Giebel include the following:

  • MIFlowCyt-EV: a framework for standardized reporting of extracellular vesicle flow cytometry experiments, 2020, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
  • Critical considerations for the development of potency tests for therapeutic applications of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived small extracellular vesicles, 2021, Cytotherapy
  • Small extracellular vesicles obtained from hypoxic mesenchymal stromal cells have unique characteristics that promote cerebral angiogenesis, brain remodeling and neurological recovery after focal cerebral ischemia in mice, 2021, Basic Research in Cardiology
  • A compendium of single extracellular vesicle flow cytometry, 2023, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
  • Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles Induce Ischemic Neuroprotection by Modulating Leukocytes and Specifically Neutrophils, 2020, Stroke

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Giebel include Tobias Tertel, Sai Kiang Lim, Rebecca Lim, Bruce L. Levine, and Rachele Ciccocioppo.

  • Tobias Tertel
  • Sai Kiang Lim
  • Rebecca Lim
  • Bruce L. Levine
  • Rachele Ciccocioppo

Giebel has published extensively in venues such as Cytotherapy, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, and Frontiers in Immunology.

  • Cytotherapy
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • Frontiers in Immunology

Among book publications, Bernd Giebel contributed to a publication titled Extracellular Vesicles released by the Royal Society of Chemistry in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018) : a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines

    Clotilde Théry;Kenneth W. Witwer;Elena Aikawa;Maria Jose Alcaraz

  • Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions

    María Yáñez-Mó;Pia R.-M. Siljander;Zoraida Andreu;Apolonija Bedina Zavec

  • Applying extracellular vesicles based therapeutics in clinical trials - an ISEV position paper

    Thomas Lener;Mario Gimona;Ludwig Aigner;Verena Börger

  • MSC-derived exosomes: a novel tool to treat therapy-refractory graft-versus-host disease

    Kordelas L;Rebmann;Ludwig Ak;Radtke S

  • EV-TRACK: transparent reporting and centralizing knowledge in extracellular vesicle research

    Jan Van Deun;Pieter Mestdagh;Patrizia Agostinis;Özden Akay

  • Characterisation of exosomes derived from human cells by nanoparticle tracking analysis and scanning electron microscopy.

    Viktoriya Sokolova;Anna-Kristin Ludwig;Sandra Hornung;Olga Rotan

  • Extracellular Vesicles Improve Post-Stroke Neuroregeneration and Prevent Postischemic Immunosuppression

    Thorsten R. Doeppner;Josephine Herz;André Görgens;Jana Schlechter

  • Exosomes: small vesicles participating in intercellular communication.

    Anna-Kristin Ludwig;Bernd Giebel

  • Evidence-Based Clinical Use of Nanoscale Extracellular Vesicles in Nanomedicine

    Stefano Fais;Lorraine O'Driscoll;Francesc E. Borras;Edit Buzas

  • Defining mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-derived small extracellular vesicles for therapeutic applications

    Kenneth W. Witwer;Bas W.M. Van Balkom;Stefania Bruno;Andre Choo

  • EVpedia: a community web portal for extracellular vesicles research

    Dae-Kyum Kim;Jaewook Lee;Sae Rom Kim;Dong Sic Choi

  • Temozolomide preferentially depletes cancer stem cells in glioblastoma.

    Dagmar Beier;Stefanie Röhrl;Deepu R. Pillai;Stefanie Schwarz

  • The basic-helix-loop-helix domain of Drosophila lethal of scute protein is sufficient for proneural function and activates neurogenic genes

    Uwe Hinz;Bernd Giebel;JoséA. Campos-Ortega

  • Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles and Their Potential as Novel Immunomodulatory Therapeutic Agents

    Verena Börger;Michel Bremer;Rita Ferrer-Tur;Lena Gockeln

  • Concise Review: Developing Best-Practice Models for the Therapeutic Use of Extracellular Vesicles

    Agnes T Reiner;Kenneth W Witwer;Bas Wm van Balkom;Joel de Beer

  • MIFlowCyt-EV: a framework for standardized reporting of extracellular vesicle flow cytometry experiments

    Joshua A. Welsh;Edwin Van Der Pol;Ger J.A. Arkesteijn;Michel Bremer

  • Evaluation of human platelet lysate versus fetal bovine serum for culture of mesenchymal stromal cells

    Hatim Hemeda;Bernd Giebel;Wolfgang Wagner

  • Optimisation of imaging flow cytometry for the analysis of single extracellular vesicles by using fluorescence-tagged vesicles as biological reference material

    André Görgens;Michel Bremer;Rita Ferrer-Tur;Florian Murke

  • Applying extracellular vesicles based therapeutics in clinical trials

    Thomas Lener;Mario Gimona;Ludwig Aigner;Verena Börger

  • EVpedia: A community web portal for extracellular vesicles research

    D.-K. Kim;J. Lee;S. R. Kim;D.-S. Choi

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk M. Hermann
Dirk M. Hermann University of Duisburg-Essen
Kenneth W. Witwer
Kenneth W. Witwer Johns Hopkins University
Sai Kiang Lim
Sai Kiang Lim Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Mario Gimona
Mario Gimona Paracelsus Medical University
Jan Lötvall
Jan Lötvall University of Gothenburg
Samir El Andaloussi
Samir El Andaloussi Karolinska Institute
Andrew F. Hill
Andrew F. Hill Victoria University
Edit I. Buzás
Edit I. Buzás Semmelweis University
Hernando A. del Portillo
Hernando A. del Portillo University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open the door to diverse, fast-growing health science careers. Today, many related fields, such as medical imaging and allied health, offer flexible online options—ideal for students needing a balance between education and life responsibilities.

If you’re interested in non-traditional biology roles, consider specialized healthcare training, like studying at an ultrasound tech school online or enrolling in a cheapest radiology tech programs. These programs focus on critical imaging skills and safety knowledge and can lead to in-demand jobs in hospitals and clinics.

For students drawn to nutrition and health, pursuing one of the best dietetics programs can lead to a career as a registered dietitian, nutritionist, or food scientist. Those seeking entry-level positions in healthcare should consider enrolling in an online medical assisting school, often available with financial aid options.

By selecting the right program, you can tailor your study of biology or biochemistry to fit your career aspirations and take advantage of the growing demand for healthcare professionals in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Bernd Giebel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles