| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business and Management | 44 | 1331 | 1244 | 42 | 40 | 208 | 13069 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Erik Stam between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Erik Stam published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2006. 19 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.
229 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2001 | 1 |
| 2002 | 1 |
| 2003 | 7 |
| 2004 | 5 |
| 2005 | 11 |
| 2006 | 20 |
| 2007 | 4 |
| 2008 | 16 |
| 2009 | 16 |
| 2010 | 13 |
| 2011 | 16 |
| 2012 | 14 |
| 2013 | 8 |
| 2014 | 4 |
| 2015 | 10 |
| 2016 | 9 |
| 2017 | 10 |
| 2018 | 11 |
| 2019 | 8 |
| 2020 | 3 |
| 2021 | 9 |
| 2022 | 1 |
| 2023 | 7 |
| 2024 | 8 |
| 2025 | 11 |
| Total | 229 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Stam sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 208 publications — 77th percentile
77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 35–39 | 2 | |
| 40–44 | 2 | |
| 45–49 | 5 | |
| 50–54 | 20 | |
| 55–59 | 39 | |
| 60–64 | 66 | |
| 65–69 | 52 | |
| 70–74 | 80 | |
| 75–79 | 83 | |
| 80–84 | 116 | |
| 85–89 | 94 | |
| 90–94 | 111 | |
| 95–99 | 122 | |
| 100–104 | 104 | |
| 105–109 | 113 | |
| 110–114 | 96 | |
| 115–119 | 97 | |
| 120–124 | 112 | |
| 125–129 | 93 | |
| 130–134 | 79 | |
| 135–139 | 69 | |
| 140–144 | 80 | |
| 145–149 | 81 | |
| 150–154 | 85 | |
| 155–159 | 50 | |
| 160–164 | 74 | |
| 165–169 | 61 | |
| 170–174 | 40 | |
| 175–179 | 44 | |
| 180–184 | 47 | |
| 185–189 | 59 | |
| 190–194 | 35 | |
| 195–199 | 37 | |
| 200–204 | 49 | |
| 205–209 | 48 | 208 |
| 210–214 | 34 | |
| 215–219 | 31 | |
| 220–224 | 37 | |
| 225–229 | 34 | |
| 230–234 | 25 | |
| 235–239 | 28 | |
| 240–244 | 34 | |
| 245–249 | 28 | |
| 250–254 | 23 | |
| 255–259 | 22 | |
| 260–264 | 11 | |
| 265–269 | 16 | |
| 270–274 | 23 | |
| 275–279 | 12 | |
| 280–284 | 16 | |
| 285–289 | 10 | |
| 290–294 | 12 | |
| 295–299 | 12 | |
| 300–304 | 8 | |
| 305–309 | 13 | |
| 310–314 | 13 | |
| 315–319 | 6 | |
| 320–324 | 10 | |
| 325–329 | 9 | |
| 330–334 | 7 | |
| 335–339 | 10 | |
| 340–344 | 10 | |
| 345–349 | 7 | |
| 350–354 | 4 | |
| 355–359 | 10 | |
| 360–364 | 3 | |
| 365–369 | 7 | |
| 370–374 | 2 | |
| 375–379 | 8 | |
| 380–384 | 4 | |
| 385–389 | 5 | |
| 390–394 | 5 | |
| 395–399 | 2 | |
| 400–404 | 2 | |
| 405–409 | 4 | |
| 410–414 | 3 | |
| 415–419 | 2 | |
| 420–424 | 5 | |
| 425–429 | 3 | |
| 430–434 | 1 | |
| 435 | 1 | |
| 436+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Stam sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 44 D-Index — 57th percentile
57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 156 | |
| 31 | 159 | |
| 32 | 171 | |
| 33 | 161 | |
| 34 | 135 | |
| 35 | 124 | |
| 36 | 114 | |
| 37 | 111 | |
| 38 | 103 | |
| 39 | 89 | |
| 40 | 81 | |
| 41 | 97 | |
| 42 | 80 | |
| 43 | 69 | |
| 44 | 68 | 44 |
| 45 | 63 | |
| 46 | 54 | |
| 47 | 69 | |
| 48 | 50 | |
| 49 | 58 | |
| 50 | 54 | |
| 51 | 62 | |
| 52 | 54 | |
| 53 | 43 | |
| 54 | 49 | |
| 55 | 35 | |
| 56 | 40 | |
| 57 | 44 | |
| 58 | 34 | |
| 59 | 29 | |
| 60 | 48 | |
| 61 | 32 | |
| 62 | 30 | |
| 63 | 22 | |
| 64 | 22 | |
| 65 | 19 | |
| 66 | 20 | |
| 67 | 18 | |
| 68 | 17 | |
| 69 | 21 | |
| 70 | 20 | |
| 71 | 19 | |
| 72 | 14 | |
| 73 | 10 | |
| 74 | 16 | |
| 75 | 24 | |
| 76 | 13 | |
| 77 | 19 | |
| 78 | 8 | |
| 79 | 6 | |
| 80 | 4 | |
| 81 | 12 | |
| 82 | 7 | |
| 83 | 7 | |
| 84 | 6 | |
| 85 | 10 | |
| 86 | 4 | |
| 87 | 11 | |
| 88 | 6 | |
| 89+ | 96 |
Erik Stam is a researcher affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their academic contributions focus primarily on the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, and Economics, Econometrics and Finance.
The scientist's main areas of study include subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Accounting, and Business and International Management. Their research covers a variety of topics, emphasizing Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences, Private Equity and Venture Capital, Innovation and Socioeconomic Development, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Firm Innovation and Growth, Economic and Technological Innovation, and Innovation Policy and R&D.
Erik Stam has authored several influential papers in peer-reviewed journals. Notable recent publications include:
Their frequent co-authors include Bernd Wurth, Niels Bosma, Christina Theodoraki, Didier Chabaud, and Ben Spigel.
Erik Stam commonly publishes in venues such as SSRN Electronic Journal, Small Business Economics, Academy of Management Proceedings, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, and Research Policy.
Erik Stam
Zoltan J. Acs;Erik Stam;Erik Stam;David B. Audretsch;Allan O’Connor
Erik Stam;Andrew van de Ven
Erik Stam;Erik Stam;Erik Stam;Karl Wennberg
Elizabeth Garnsey;Erik Stam;Paul Heffernan
Niels Bosma;Mark Sanders;Erik Stam
Erik Stam
Bernd Wurth;Erik Stam;Ben Spigel
F.C. Stam;V. Schutjens;E. Stam
Siri Terjesen;Niels Bosma;Erik Stam
Erik Stam
Slinger Jansen;Tommy van de Zande;Sjaak Brinkkemper;Erik Stam
Erik Stam;Jeroen P.j. De jong;Gerard Marlet
Martin Henning;Erik Stam;Rik Wenting
A.R. Thurik;E. Stam;D.B. Audretsch
Koen Frenken;Elena Cefis;Erik Stam
Unknown
Niels Bosma;Erik Stam;Veronique Schutjens
Niels Bosma;Sander Wennekers;Erik Stam
Friedemann Polzin;Helen Toxopeus;Erik Stam
Egbert Wever;Erik Stam
Erik Stam;Kashifa Suddle;S. Jolanda A. Hessels;André J. van Stel
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring business and management studies in the USA opens the door to many flexible online learning pathways. Professionals seeking leadership roles might be interested in an online PhD organizational leadership program, which blends advanced theory with real-world application and can position graduates for executive or teaching positions.
When choosing an online degree, accreditation is a key issue. Enrolling in nationally accredited online universities helps ensure recognized credentials and quality instruction, which is especially important for advancing your career or continuing your education.
For those looking to finish their degree faster, there are options like an online construction management accelerated program. These programs can save both time and tuition while preparing students for rapidly growing sectors.
The healthcare field is also expanding, and individuals can pursue management roles through healthcare administration programs that are fully online and can be completed in less time than traditional degrees.
University of Delaware
Aligarh Muslim University
Johns Hopkins University
Massachusetts General Hospital
University of California, Santa Cruz
University of Georgia
Beijing Normal University
California Institute of Technology
Leiden University
Max Planck Society
Cardiff University
University of Adelaide
University of Pecs
University of Nottingham
Newcastle University
