World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
7727
World Ranking
16042
National Ranking
696

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
47
Citations
7907
World Ranking
4909
National Ranking
100

Eric Favre publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Favre sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 201 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Eric Favre D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Favre sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric Favre is affiliated with the University of Lorraine in France and specializes in engineering, with a focus on mechanical engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields including water science and technology, biomedical engineering, materials chemistry, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The main topics of their research include membrane separation and gas transport, membrane separation technologies, carbon dioxide capture technologies, membrane-based ion separation techniques, extraction and separation processes, heat transfer and optimization, and phase equilibria and thermodynamics.

Favre has published in several frequent venues such as Membranes, Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, Carbon Capture Science & Technology, Chemical Engineering Science, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Membrane Processes for Direct Carbon Dioxide Capture From Air: Possibilities and Limitations (2021), Frontiers in Chemical Engineering
  • Review on the preparation of carbon membranes derived from phenolic resins for gas separation: From petrochemical precursors to bioresources (2021), Carbon
  • Membrane Separation Processes and Post-Combustion Carbon Capture: State of the Art and Prospects (2022), Membranes
  • Development of new pervaporation composite membranes for desalination: Theoretical and experimental investigations (2021), Desalination
  • Membrane contactors for intensified gas-liquid absorption processes with physical solvents: A critical parametric study (2021), Journal of Membrane Science

Favre frequently collaborates with co-authors including Christophe Castel, Denis Roizard, Rainier Hreiz, Paul de Joannis, and Olivier Authier.

Best Publications

  • Carbon dioxide recovery from post-combustion processes: Can gas permeation membranes compete with absorption?

    Eric Favre

  • Membrane processes for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: A parametric study

    Roda Bounaceur;Nancy Lape;Denis Roizard;Cécile Vallieres

  • Status and progress of membrane contactors in post-combustion carbon capture: A state-of-the-art review of new developments

    Shuaifei Zhao;Shuaifei Zhao;Paul H.M. Feron;Liyuan Deng;Eric Favre

  • Membrane processes and postcombustion carbon dioxide capture: Challenges and prospects

    Eric Favre;Eric Favre

  • Sorption, diffusion and vapor permeation of various penetrants through dense poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes: a transport analysis

    E. Favre;P. Schaetzel;Q.T. Nguygen;R. Clément

  • Energy Efficiency of Oxygen Enriched Air Production Technologies: Cryogeny vs Membranes

    Bouchra Belaissaoui;Yann Le Moullec;Hayato Hagi;Eric Favre

  • Energy efficiency of a hybrid membrane/condensation process for VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds) recovery from air: A generic approach

    Bouchra Belaissaoui;Yann Le Moullec;Eric Favre

  • Hybrid membrane cryogenic process for post-combustion CO2 capture

    Bouchra Belaissaoui;Yann Le Moullec;David Willson;Eric Favre

  • Membrane separations and energy efficiency

    Christophe Castel;Eric Favre

  • Biogas, membranes and carbon dioxide capture

    Eric Favre;Roda Bounaceur;Denis Roizard

  • A review of gas separation technologies within emission reduction programs in the iron and steel sector: Current application and development perspectives

    Álvaro A. Ramírez-Santos;Christophe Castel;Eric Favre

  • A dense membrane contactor for intensified CO2 gas/liquid absorption in post-combustion capture

    P.T. Nguyen;Elsa Lasseuguette;Elsa Lasseuguette;Yaocihuatl Medina-Gonzalez;Yaocihuatl Medina-Gonzalez;Jean-Christophe Remigy;Jean-Christophe Remigy

  • Study of an innovative gas-liquid contactor for CO2 absorption

    Elodie Chabanon;Chakib Bouallou;J.C. Remigy;E. Lasseuguette

  • Swelling of crosslinked polydimethylsiloxane networks by pure solvents: Influence of temperature

    E. Favre

  • Sorption of organic solvents into dense silicone membranes. Part 1.—Validity and limitations of Flory–Huggins and related theories

    Eric Favre;Quang Trong Nguyen;Pierre Schaetzel;Robert Clément

  • Physical alginate hydrogels based on hydrophobic or dual hydrophobic/ionic interactions: bead formation, structure, and stability.

    M. Rastello de Boisseson;Michèle Leonard;Patrick Hubert;Philippe Marchal

  • On Schroeder's paradox

    Cécile Vallieres;Dirk Winkelmann;Denis Roizard;Eric Favre

  • Membrane contactors for intensified post-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas–liquid absorption processes

    E. Favre;H.F. Svendsen

  • Membrane Processes for Direct Carbon Dioxide Capture From Air: Possibilities and Limitations

    Christophe Castel;Roda Bounaceur;Eric Favre

  • Membrane Contactors for Postcombustion Carbon Dioxide Capture: A Comparative Study of Wetting Resistance on Long Time Scales

    Elodie Chabanon;Denis Roizard;Eric Favre

  • A hybrid process combining oxygen enriched air combustion and membrane separation for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture

    Eric Favre;Roda Bounaceur;Denis Roizard

  • Life cycle assessment of post-combustion CO 2 capture: A comparison between membrane separation and chemical absorption processes

    Lorena Giordano;Denis Roizard;Eric Favre

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Dubessy
Jean Dubessy University of Lorraine
Jean-Noël Jaubert
Jean-Noël Jaubert University of Lorraine
Edith Dellacherie
Edith Dellacherie University of Lorraine
Marc Parmentier
Marc Parmentier Université Libre de Bruxelles
Jacques Pironon
Jacques Pironon University of Lorraine
Shuaifei Zhao
Shuaifei Zhao Deakin University
Pierre Agrinier
Pierre Agrinier Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Jingwei Hou
Jingwei Hou University of Queensland
Enrico Drioli
Enrico Drioli National Research Council (CNR)
William J. Koros
William J. Koros Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Eric Favre

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles