World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6560
World Ranking
8554
National Ranking
504

Elizabeth Rieger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Rieger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elizabeth Rieger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Rieger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • An eating disorder-specific model of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT-ED): causal pathways and treatment implications.

    Elizabeth Rieger;Dorothy J. Van Buren;Monica Bishop;Marian Tanofsky-Kraff

  • A comparison of eating, exercise, shape, and weight related symptomatology in males with muscle dysmorphia and anorexia nervosa.

    Stuart B. Murray;Elizabeth Rieger;Tom Hildebrandt;Lisa Karlov

  • Psychiatric and medical comorbidities of eating disorders: findings from a rapid review of the literature

    Unknown

  • Muscle dysmorphia and the DSM-V conundrum: Where does it belong? A review paper

    Stuart B Murray;Elizabeth Rieger;Stephen W Touyz;Yolanda De la Garza Garcia

  • Risk factors for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review

    Unknown

  • Increased plasticity of the bodily self in eating disorders.

    Ertimiss Eshkevari;Elizabeth Rieger;M R Longo;P Haggard

  • Attentional biases in eating disorders: A visual probe detection procedure

    Elizabeth Rieger;David E. Schotte;Stephen W. Touyz;P. J. V. Beumont

  • A comparison of quality of life in obese individuals with and without binge eating disorder

    Elizabeth Rieger;Denise E. Wilfley;Richard I. Stein;Valentina Marino

  • Development of an instrument to assess readiness to recover in anorexia nervosa.

    Elizabeth Rieger;Stephen Touyz;David Schotte;Peter Beumont

  • Investigating Adolescent Stress and Body Image.

    Kristen M. Murray;Don G. Byrne;Elizabeth Rieger

  • Persistent body image disturbance following recovery from eating disorders

    Ertimiss Eshkevari;Elizabeth Rieger;Matthew R. Longo;Patrick Haggard

  • The Anorexia Nervosa Stages of Change Questionnaire (ANSOCQ): information regarding its psychometric properties.

    Elizabeth Rieger;Stephen W. Touyz;Peter J. V. Beumont

  • Cross-Cultural Research on Anorexia Nervosa: Assumptions Regarding the Role of Body Weight.

    Elizabeth Rieger;Stephen W. Touyz;Tony Swain;Peter J.V. Beumont

  • Eating disorder outcomes: findings from a rapid review of over a decade of research

    Unknown

  • Epidemiology of eating disorders: population, prevalence, disease burden and quality of life informing public policy in Australia—a rapid review

    Unknown

  • The effect of attentional bias toward shape- and weight-related information on body dissatisfaction.

    Evelyn Smith;Elizabeth Rieger

  • Masculinity and femininity in the divergence of male body image concerns

    Stuart B Murray;Elizabeth Rieger;Lisa Karlov;Stephen W Touyz

  • A comparison of maladaptive schemata in treatment-seeking obese adults and normal-weight control subjects

    Kate Anderson;Elizabeth Rieger;Ian Caterson

  • An Investigation of the Transdiagnostic Model of Eating Disorders in the Context of Muscle Dysmorphia

    Stuart B. Murray;Elizabeth Rieger;Lisa Karlov;Stephen W. Touyz

  • What prevents young adults from seeking help? Barriers toward help-seeking for eating disorder symptomatology.

    Kathina Ali;Kathina Ali;Daniel B. Fassnacht;Daniel B. Fassnacht;Louise Farrer;Elizabeth Rieger

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen Touyz
Stephen Touyz University of Sydney
Stuart B. Murray
Stuart B. Murray University of California, Los Angeles
Jonathan Mond
Jonathan Mond University of Tasmania
Janet Treasure
Janet Treasure King's College London
Silja Vocks
Silja Vocks Osnabrück University
Romina Palermo
Romina Palermo University of Western Australia
Phillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay Western Sydney University
Bryan Rodgers
Bryan Rodgers Australian National University
Denise E. Wilfley
Denise E. Wilfley Washington University in St. Louis
Deborah Mitchison
Deborah Mitchison University of Technology Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Rieger

Recently Published Articles