World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth J. Screaton

Elizabeth J. Screaton

Elizabeth J. Screaton publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Screaton sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Elizabeth J. Screaton D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Screaton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

Elizabeth J. Screaton is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within earth and environmental sciences, with a focus on geophysical and engineering aspects of planetary sciences. The main fields of study they are involved in include Earth and Planetary Sciences, Engineering, and Environmental Science.

Their work delves deeply into several subfields, particularly Geophysics, Ocean Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Geology, and Global and Planetary Change. Across these areas, their research engages key topics such as Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods, Drilling and Well Engineering, Geological and Geophysical Studies, Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis, and Geological Modeling and Analysis.

Elizabeth J. Screaton has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in venues like Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) hosted by La Trobe University, and journals including Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, Science Advances, and Hydrological Sciences Journal.

Frequent collaborators in their published work include Gregory F. Moore, Achim Kopf, Saneatsu Saito, Adam Klaus, and Michael B. Underwood.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Slow slip source characterized by lithological and geometric heterogeneity, 2020, Science Advances
  • Do the Mann-Kendall test and Theil-Sen slope fail to inform trend significance and magnitude in hydrology?, 2023, Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Investigating the Basal Shear Zone of the Submarine Tuaheni Landslide Complex, New Zealand: A Core-Log-Seismic Integration Study, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Effect of Mississippi River discharge and local hydrological variables on salinity of nearby estuaries using a machine learning algorithm, 2021, Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science
  • Deformation Structures From Splay and Décollement Faults in the Nankai Accretionary Prism, SW Japan(IODP NanTroSEIZE Expedition 316): Evidence for Slow and Rapid Slip in Fault Rocks, 2020, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems

Elizabeth J. Screaton has been recognized as a Fellow of the Geological Society of America. This distinction reflects a level of professional engagement within the geological sciences community.

Best Publications

  • Interactions between deformation and fluids in the frontal thrust region of the NanTroSEIZE transect offshore the Kii Peninsula, Japan: Results from IODP Expedition 316 Sites C0006 and C0007

    E Screaton;G Kimura;D Curewitz;D Curewitz;G Moore;G Moore

  • New insights into deformation and fluid flow processes in the Nankai Trough accretionary prism: Results of Ocean Drilling Program Leg 190

    Gregory F. Moore;Asahiko Taira;Adam Klaus;Luann Becker

  • Origin and evolution of a splay fault in the Nankai accretionary wedge

    Michael Strasser;Gregory F. Moore;Gregory F. Moore;Gaku Kimura;Gaku Kimura;Yujin Kitamura

  • Seismic slip propagation to the updip end of plate boundary subduction interface faults: Vitrinite reflectance geothermometry on Integrated Ocean Drilling Program NanTro SEIZE cores

    Arito Sakaguchi;Frederick Chester;Daniel Curewitz;Olivier Fabbri

  • Permeabilities, fluid pressures, and flow rates in the Barbados Ridge Complex

    Elizabeth J. Screaton;Dennis R. Wuthrich;Shirley J. Dreiss

  • Water exchange and pressure transfer between conduits and matrix and their influence on hydrodynamics of two karst aquifers with sinking streams

    Vincent Bailly-Comte;Vincent Bailly-Comte;Jonathan B. Martin;Hervé Jourde;Elizabeth J. Screaton

  • Geochemical and statistical evidence of recharge, mixing, and controls on spring discharge in an eogenetic karst aquifer

    Paul J. Moore;Jonathan B. Martin;Elizabeth J. Screaton

  • Porosity loss within the underthrust sediments of the Nankai accretionary complex: Implications for overpressures

    Elizabeth Screaton;Demian Saffer;Pierre Henry;Sabine Hunze

  • Slow slip source characterized by lithological and geometric heterogeneity

    Philip M. Barnes;Laura M. Wallace;Demian M. Saffer;Rebecca E. Bell

  • Mechanisms of englacial conduit formation and their implications for subglacial recharge

    J.D. Gulley;J.D. Gulley;D.I. Benn;E. Screaton;J. Martin

  • Slumping and mass transport deposition in the Nankai fore arc: Evidence from IODP drilling and 3‐D reflection seismic data

    Michael Strasser;Gregory F. Moore;Gaku Kimura;Achim J. Kopf

  • Fluid flow in accretionary prisms: Evidence for focused, time-variable discharge

    Bobb Carson;Elizabeth J. Screaton

  • Spatial and temporal evolution of the megasplay fault in the Nankai Trough

    Gaku Kimura;Gregory F Moore;Michael Strasser;Elizabeth J Screaton

  • Consolidation patterns during initiation and evolution of a plate-boundary decollement zone: Northern Barbados accretionary prism

    J. Casey Moore;Adam Klaus;Nathan L. Bangs;Barbara Bekins

  • Expedition 316 Site C0004

    M. Kinoshita;H. Tobin;J. Ashi;G. Kimura

  • Conduit properties and karstification in the unconfined Floridan aquifer.

    Elizabeth Screaton;Jonathan B. Martin;Brian Ginn;Lauren Smith

  • Conduit enlargement in an eogenetic karst aquifer

    Paul J. Moore;Jonathan B. Martin;Elizabeth J. Screaton;Philip S. Neuhoff

  • Expedition 316 summary

    E.J. Screaton;G. Kimura;D. Curewitz

  • Permeability–porosity relationships of subduction zone sediments

    Kusali Gamage;Elizabeth Screaton;Barbara Bekins;Ivano Aiello

  • Expedition 315 Site C0002

    M. Kinoshita;H. Tobin;J. Ashi;G. Kimura

Frequent Co-Authors

Gaku Kimura
Gaku Kimura Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Masataka Kinoshita
Masataka Kinoshita University of Tokyo
Jonathan B. Martin
Jonathan B. Martin University of Florida
Gregory F. Moore
Gregory F. Moore University of Hawaii at Manoa
Juichiro Ashi
Juichiro Ashi University of Tokyo
Siegfried Lallemant
Siegfried Lallemant CY Cergy Paris University
Shemin Ge
Shemin Ge University of Colorado Boulder
Michael B. Underwood
Michael B. Underwood New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Steffen Kutterolf
Steffen Kutterolf Kiel University
Robert N. Harris
Robert N. Harris Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities. Many students find that combining Earth Science knowledge with management skills leads to roles in environmental project coordination or corporate sustainability. Programs like online human resource management masters programs offer valuable leadership training applicable across scientific organizations.

Online education is also increasingly accessible for non-traditional students. Seniors seeking to enhance their expertise or pursue new passions can benefit from tailored options highlighted in the online degree programs for seniors. These programs provide flexibility and support, enabling lifelong learning in science or related fields.

Additionally, those with an interest in data management or archiving within Earth Science could consider degrees in library and information science. Accredited programs such as the online mlis programs accredited ala ensure quality education in this domain. A masters in library science can open doors to career paths involving scientific data curation and resource management.

By exploring these related online degrees, Earth Science students and professionals can diversify their skills and adapt to a variety of evolving career landscapes.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth J. Screaton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles