World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth J. Screaton

Elizabeth J. Screaton

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 38 6549 6069 2315 2053 165 5110

Elizabeth J. Screaton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth J. Screaton between 1990 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth J. Screaton published across 34 years, from 1990 to 2023, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2009. 1 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2009. 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1990 2023

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth J. Screaton: publications per year, 1990 to 2023
Year Publications
1990 3
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 4
1998 2
1999 0
2000 3
2001 3
2002 4
2003 5
2004 1
2005 3
2006 8
2007 4
2008 8
2009 25
2010 4
2011 16
2012 12
2013 10
2014 9
2015 9
2016 2
2017 5
2018 4
2019 13
2020 4
2021 4
2022 0
2023 1
Total 168
Download as CSV

Elizabeth J. Screaton publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Screaton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 165 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458 165
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth J. Screaton D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Screaton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344 38
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

Elizabeth J. Screaton is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within earth and environmental sciences, with a focus on geophysical and engineering aspects of planetary sciences. The main fields of study they are involved in include Earth and Planetary Sciences, Engineering, and Environmental Science.

Their work delves deeply into several subfields, particularly Geophysics, Ocean Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Geology, and Global and Planetary Change. Across these areas, their research engages key topics such as Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods, Drilling and Well Engineering, Geological and Geophysical Studies, Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis, and Geological Modeling and Analysis.

Elizabeth J. Screaton has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in venues like Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) hosted by La Trobe University, and journals including Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, Science Advances, and Hydrological Sciences Journal.

Frequent collaborators in their published work include Gregory F. Moore, Achim Kopf, Saneatsu Saito, Adam Klaus, and Michael B. Underwood.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Slow slip source characterized by lithological and geometric heterogeneity, 2020, Science Advances
  • Do the Mann-Kendall test and Theil-Sen slope fail to inform trend significance and magnitude in hydrology?, 2023, Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Investigating the Basal Shear Zone of the Submarine Tuaheni Landslide Complex, New Zealand: A Core-Log-Seismic Integration Study, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Effect of Mississippi River discharge and local hydrological variables on salinity of nearby estuaries using a machine learning algorithm, 2021, Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science
  • Deformation Structures From Splay and Décollement Faults in the Nankai Accretionary Prism, SW Japan(IODP NanTroSEIZE Expedition 316): Evidence for Slow and Rapid Slip in Fault Rocks, 2020, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems

Elizabeth J. Screaton has been recognized as a Fellow of the Geological Society of America. This distinction reflects a level of professional engagement within the geological sciences community.

Best Publications

  • Interactions between deformation and fluids in the frontal thrust region of the NanTroSEIZE transect offshore the Kii Peninsula, Japan: Results from IODP Expedition 316 Sites C0006 and C0007

    E Screaton;G Kimura;D Curewitz;D Curewitz;G Moore;G Moore

  • New insights into deformation and fluid flow processes in the Nankai Trough accretionary prism: Results of Ocean Drilling Program Leg 190

    Gregory F. Moore;Asahiko Taira;Adam Klaus;Luann Becker

  • Origin and evolution of a splay fault in the Nankai accretionary wedge

    Michael Strasser;Gregory F. Moore;Gregory F. Moore;Gaku Kimura;Gaku Kimura;Yujin Kitamura

  • Seismic slip propagation to the updip end of plate boundary subduction interface faults: Vitrinite reflectance geothermometry on Integrated Ocean Drilling Program NanTro SEIZE cores

    Arito Sakaguchi;Frederick Chester;Daniel Curewitz;Olivier Fabbri

  • Permeabilities, fluid pressures, and flow rates in the Barbados Ridge Complex

    Elizabeth J. Screaton;Dennis R. Wuthrich;Shirley J. Dreiss

  • Water exchange and pressure transfer between conduits and matrix and their influence on hydrodynamics of two karst aquifers with sinking streams

    Vincent Bailly-Comte;Vincent Bailly-Comte;Jonathan B. Martin;Hervé Jourde;Elizabeth J. Screaton

  • Geochemical and statistical evidence of recharge, mixing, and controls on spring discharge in an eogenetic karst aquifer

    Paul J. Moore;Jonathan B. Martin;Elizabeth J. Screaton

  • Porosity loss within the underthrust sediments of the Nankai accretionary complex: Implications for overpressures

    Elizabeth Screaton;Demian Saffer;Pierre Henry;Sabine Hunze

  • Slow slip source characterized by lithological and geometric heterogeneity

    Philip M. Barnes;Laura M. Wallace;Demian M. Saffer;Rebecca E. Bell

  • Mechanisms of englacial conduit formation and their implications for subglacial recharge

    J.D. Gulley;J.D. Gulley;D.I. Benn;E. Screaton;J. Martin

  • Slumping and mass transport deposition in the Nankai fore arc: Evidence from IODP drilling and 3‐D reflection seismic data

    Michael Strasser;Gregory F. Moore;Gaku Kimura;Achim J. Kopf

  • Fluid flow in accretionary prisms: Evidence for focused, time-variable discharge

    Bobb Carson;Elizabeth J. Screaton

  • Spatial and temporal evolution of the megasplay fault in the Nankai Trough

    Gaku Kimura;Gregory F Moore;Michael Strasser;Elizabeth J Screaton

  • Consolidation patterns during initiation and evolution of a plate-boundary decollement zone: Northern Barbados accretionary prism

    J. Casey Moore;Adam Klaus;Nathan L. Bangs;Barbara Bekins

  • Expedition 316 Site C0004

    M. Kinoshita;H. Tobin;J. Ashi;G. Kimura

  • Conduit properties and karstification in the unconfined Floridan aquifer.

    Elizabeth Screaton;Jonathan B. Martin;Brian Ginn;Lauren Smith

  • Conduit enlargement in an eogenetic karst aquifer

    Paul J. Moore;Jonathan B. Martin;Elizabeth J. Screaton;Philip S. Neuhoff

  • Expedition 316 summary

    E.J. Screaton;G. Kimura;D. Curewitz

  • Permeability–porosity relationships of subduction zone sediments

    Kusali Gamage;Elizabeth Screaton;Barbara Bekins;Ivano Aiello

  • Expedition 315 Site C0002

    M. Kinoshita;H. Tobin;J. Ashi;G. Kimura

Frequent Co-Authors

Gaku Kimura
Gaku Kimura Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Masataka Kinoshita
Masataka Kinoshita University of Tokyo
Jonathan B. Martin
Jonathan B. Martin University of Florida
Gregory F. Moore
Gregory F. Moore University of Hawaii at Manoa
Juichiro Ashi
Juichiro Ashi University of Tokyo
Siegfried Lallemant
Siegfried Lallemant CY Cergy Paris University
Shemin Ge
Shemin Ge University of Colorado Boulder
Michael B. Underwood
Michael B. Underwood New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Steffen Kutterolf
Steffen Kutterolf Kiel University
Robert N. Harris
Robert N. Harris Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities. Many students find that combining Earth Science knowledge with management skills leads to roles in environmental project coordination or corporate sustainability. Programs like online human resource management masters programs offer valuable leadership training applicable across scientific organizations.

Online education is also increasingly accessible for non-traditional students. Seniors seeking to enhance their expertise or pursue new passions can benefit from tailored options highlighted in the online degree programs for seniors. These programs provide flexibility and support, enabling lifelong learning in science or related fields.

Additionally, those with an interest in data management or archiving within Earth Science could consider degrees in library and information science. Accredited programs such as the online mlis programs accredited ala ensure quality education in this domain. A masters in library science can open doors to career paths involving scientific data curation and resource management.

By exploring these related online degrees, Earth Science students and professionals can diversify their skills and adapt to a variety of evolving career landscapes.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth J. Screaton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles