World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
29170
World Ranking
14065
National Ranking
7135

Edwin L. Alderman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin L. Alderman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 235 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edwin L. Alderman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin L. Alderman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edwin L. Alderman was affiliated with Stanford University in the United States during their academic career.

There are no recorded publications, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues available from the data provided, which limits detailed insights into the scope of their research output and collaborative networks.

Similarly, information on the main fields of study, subfields, and primary research topics related to Edwin L. Alderman is not available in the current data.

No documented awards or recognitions have been listed for this scientist, and details pertaining to any book publications are absent.

Edwin L. Alderman is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators.

    MG Bourassa;RL Frye;SB King;KM Detre

  • Effects of intensive multiple risk factor reduction on coronary atherosclerosis and clinical cardiac events in men and women with coronary artery disease. The Stanford Coronary Risk Intervention Project (SCRIP).

    W L Haskell;E L Alderman;J M Fair;D J Maron

  • Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry.

    Mock Mb;Ringqvist I;Fisher Ld;Davis Kb

  • Results of coronary artery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function (CASS).

    E L Alderman;L D Fisher;P Litwin;G C Kaiser

  • Effect of Intrathoracic Pressure on Left Ventricular Performance

    Andrew J. Buda;Michael R. Pinsky;Neil B. Ingels;George T. Daughters

  • A randomized active-controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients. Mycophenolate Mofetil Investigators.

    Jon Kobashigawa;Leslie Miller;Dale Renlund;Robert Mentzer

  • Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry.

    Mary Emond;Michael B. Mock;Kathryn B. Davis;Lloyd D. Fisher

  • Effects of hormone replacement therapy and antioxidant Vitamin supplements on coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial

    David D. Waters;Edwin L. Alderman;Judith Hsia;Barbara V. Howard

  • Accelerated coronary vascular disease in the heart transplant patient: coronary arteriographic findings.

    Shao-Zhou Gao;Edwin L. Alderman;John S. Schroeder;James F. Silverman

  • Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis

    C M Otto;M C Mickel;J W Kennedy;E L Alderman

  • Ten-year follow-up of survival and myocardial infarction in the randomized Coronary Artery Surgery Study.

    E L Alderman;M G Bourassa;L S Cohen;K B Davis

  • Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo evidence of "angiographically silent" intimal thickening.

    F. G. Saint Goar;F. J. Pinto;E. L. Alderman;H. A. Valantine

  • Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS)

    Edwin L. Alderman;Edwin L. Alderman;Scott D. Corley;Scott D. Corley;Lloyd D. Fisher;Lloyd D. Fisher;Bernard R. Chaitman;Bernard R. Chaitman

  • Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry

    Malcolm R. Bell;Bernard J. Gersh;Hartzell V. Schaff;David R. Holmes

  • Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).

    I Ringqvist;L D Fisher;M Mock;K B Davis

  • A Preliminary Study of Diltiazem in the Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease in Heart-Transplant Recipients

    John S. Schroeder;Shao-Zhou Gao;Edwin L. Alderman;Sharon A. Hunt

  • Measurement of midwall myocardial dynamics in intact man by radiography of surgically implanted markers.

    N B Ingels;G T Daughters nd;E B Stinson;E L Alderman

  • Changes in diastolic stiffness and tone of the left ventricle during angina pectoris.

    William H. Barry;Jeff Z. Brooker;Edwin L. Alderman;Donald C. Harrison

  • Transplant coronary artery disease: histopathologic correlations with angiographic morphology.

    Danna E. Johnson;Edwin L. Alderman;John S. Schroeder;Shao-Zhou Gao

  • Coronary Artery Syndromes After Sudden Propranolol Withdrawal

    E L Alderman;D J Coltart;G E Wettach;D C Harrison

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald C. Harrison
Donald C. Harrison University of Cincinnati
John S. Schroeder
John S. Schroeder Stanford University
Richard L. Popp
Richard L. Popp Stanford University
Martial G. Bourassa
Martial G. Bourassa Montreal Heart Institute
Edward B. Stinson
Edward B. Stinson Stanford University
Sharon A. Hunt
Sharon A. Hunt Stanford University
Lloyd D. Fisher
Lloyd D. Fisher University of Washington
Kevin E. Kip
Kevin E. Kip University of South Florida
William L. Haskell
William L. Haskell Stanford University
Thomas J. Ryan
Thomas J. Ryan Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond traditional medical studies, many students explore alternative healthcare career pathways. Flexible learning options, like direct entry msn programs online, allow non-nurses to accelerate their entry into advanced nursing roles. These programs are ideal for those seeking to change careers or fast-track their education within the healthcare industry.

Some prospective students may be concerned about acceptance challenges. For a smoother admissions process, consider nursing schools with high acceptance rates that provide ample opportunities to begin your nursing journey.

Healthcare roles aren’t limited to clinical work. Administrative positions, such as medical billing and coding, can be a rewarding alternative. Many top medical billing and coding schools with financial aid offer online training, making it both accessible and affordable.

For students concerned about mandatory entrance exams, there are also nursing schools that don't require teas test, which can further ease the application process.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin L. Alderman

Recently Published Articles