World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eduardo Miguel Torres

Eduardo Miguel Torres

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
4442
World Ranking
9219
National Ranking
678

Eduardo Miguel Torres publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduardo Miguel Torres sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eduardo Miguel Torres D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduardo Miguel Torres sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eduardo Miguel Torres is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine and Engineering, with notable contributions to the subfields of Biomedical Engineering, Hematology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Biochemistry, and Biophysics.

Their scholarly output includes several recent papers that cover a range of biomedical topics and advanced technological applications. Notable publications include:

  • Recent advances in biopolymer-based hemostatic materials, 2022, published in Regenerative Biomaterials
  • Recent Developments in Glioblastoma-On-A-Chip for Advanced Drug Screening Applications, 2024, published in Small
  • 1012 Social Determinants of Health Including Zip Code, Ethnicity, Preferred Language, Race, and Insurance Status Correlate with Placental Pathology, 2025, published in Laboratory Investigation

The key research topics Eduardo Miguel Torres works on can be summarized as:

  • Hemostasis and retained surgical items
  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Blood transfusion and management
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques

Frequent collaborators of this researcher include Marvin Mecwan, Natashya Falcone, Menekşe Ermis, Kalpana Mandal, and Saurabh Sharma, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

Publication venues in which Eduardo Miguel Torres has appeared reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their work. These venues include Regenerative Biomaterials, Small, and Laboratory Investigation, each showcasing work related to medical and engineering innovations.

Best Publications

  • Behavioural, histochemical and biochemical consequences of selective immunolesions in discrete regions of the basal forebrain cholinergic system

    E. M. Torres;T. A. Perry;A. Blokland;Lawrence Stephen Wilkinson

  • Comparison of incremental and accelerating protocols of the rotarod test for the assessment of motor deficits in the 6-OHDA model

    Christelle Monville;Eduardo Miguel Torres;Stephen Bruce Dunnett

  • Functional integration of striatal allografts in a primate model of Huntington's disease

    A. Lisa Kendall;F. David Rayment;Eduardo Miguel Torres;Harry F. Baker

  • Dissociations in dopamine release in medial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum during the acquisition and extinction of classical aversive conditioning in the rat

    Lawrence Stephen Wilkinson;Trevor Humby;Andrew Simon Killcross;EM Torres

  • Striatal Transplantation in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Huntington's Disease

    Stephen Bruce Dunnett;R. J. Carter;C. Watts;Eduardo Miguel Torres

  • GDNF enhances dopaminergic cell survival and fibre outgrowth in embryonic nigral grafts

    Simon R. Sinclair;Clive N. Svendsen;Eduardo M. Torres;David Martin

  • The potential of high-resolution positron emission tomography to monitor striatal dopaminergic function in rat models of disease

    Susan P. Hume;Adriaan A. Lammertsma;Ralph Myers;Suren Rajeswaran

  • The effects of donor stage on the survival and function of embryonic striatal grafts in the adult rat brain: II. Correlation between positron emission tomography and reaching behaviour

    R. A Fricker;Eduardo Miguel Torres;S. P. Hume;R. Myers

  • Cholinergic blockade in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus disrupts short-term memory in rats.

    Stephen B. Dunnett;Anne T. Wareham;Eduardo M. Torres

  • Enhancement of amphetamine-induced locomotor activity and dopamine release in nucleus accumbens following excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus

    Lawrence Stephen Wilkinson;G. Mittleman;E. Torres;T. Humby

  • Re-examining the ontogeny of substantia nigra dopamine neurons.

    Monte A. Gates;Eduardo Miguel Torres;Anna White;Rosemary A. Fricker-Gates

  • The Placement of a Striatal Ibotenic Acid Lesion Affects Skilled Forelimb Use and the Direction of Drug-Induced Rotation

    Rosemary A. Fricker;Lucy E. Annett;Eduardo Miguel Torres;Stephen Bruce Dunnett

  • Spatially and temporally restricted chemoattractive and chemorepulsive cues direct the formation of the nigro-striatal circuit.

    Monte A. Gates;Victoria M. Coupe;Eduardo Miguel Torres;Rosemary A. Fricker-Gates

  • The Corridor Task: a simple test of lateralised response selection sensitive to unilateral dopamine deafferentation and graft-derived dopamine replacement in the striatum.

    Eilís Dowd;Christelle Monville;Eduardo Miguel Torres;Stephen Bruce Dunnett

  • Lentivector-mediated delivery of GDNF protects complex motor functions relevant to human parkinsonism in a rat lesion model

    Eilís Dowd;Christelle Monville;Eduardo Miguel Torres;Liang-Fong Wong

  • Subthalamic nucleus lesions induce deficits as well as benefits in the hemiparkinsonian rat.

    Jasmine M. Henderson;Lucy E. Annett;Lawrence J. Ryan;Wesley Chiang

  • Validation of the l-dopa-induced dyskinesia in the 6-OHDA model and evaluation of the effects of selective dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists

    Christelle Monville;Eduardo Miguel Torres;Stephen Bruce Dunnett

  • Dopamine-rich grafts in the neostriatum and/or nucleus accumbens: effects on drug-induced behaviours and skilled paw-reaching.

    D.N. Abrous;A.R.A. Shaltot;E.M. Torres;S.B. Dunnett

  • A lateralised grip strength test to evaluate unilateral nigrostriatal lesions in rats

    Stephen Bruce Dunnett;Eduardo Miguel Torres;Lucy E. Annett

  • Myelination and behaviour of tenascin-C null transgenic mice.

    B. W. Kiernan;E. Garcion;J. Ferguson;E. E. Frost

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen B. Dunnett
Stephen B. Dunnett Cardiff University
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Colin Watts
Colin Watts University of Birmingham
Harry F. Baker
Harry F. Baker University of Cambridge
Anne Elizabeth Rosser
Anne Elizabeth Rosser Cardiff University
Lawrence Stephen Wilkinson
Lawrence Stephen Wilkinson Cardiff University
Rosalind M. Ridley
Rosalind M. Ridley University of Cambridge
Trevor Humby
Trevor Humby Cardiff University
Michael V. Sofroniew
Michael V. Sofroniew University of California, Los Angeles
Roger A. Barker
Roger A. Barker University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Eduardo Miguel Torres

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles