World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Douglas M. McNair

Douglas M. McNair

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
9627
World Ranking
11267
National Ranking
5885

Douglas M. McNair publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas M. McNair sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Douglas M. McNair D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas M. McNair sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas M. McNair was affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Throughout their research career, they contributed to scientific knowledge in the area of artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Their documented work includes a publication titled Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Lead-to-Candidate Decision-Making and Beyond, released in 2022. This paper appeared in the venue Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Lead-to-Candidate Decision-Making and Beyond (2022, Zenodo - CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their work was published exclusively in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), with one recorded publication in that collection.

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Douglas M. McNair did not have recorded frequent co-authors or multiple publication venues. There are no available records of books published under their name or detailed subject fields and subfields of study. Likewise, no awards or recognitions were recorded.

Best Publications

  • Manual for the Profile of Mood States

    Douglas M. McNair;Maurice Lorr;Leo F. Droppleman

  • AN ANALYSIS OF MOOD IN NEUROTICS.

    Douglas M. McNair;Maurice Lorr

  • Imipramine and Chlordiazepoxide in Depressive and Anxiety Disorders: II. Efficacy in Anxious Outpatients

    Richard J. Kahn;Douglas M. McNair;Ronald S. Lipman;Ronald S. Lipman;Lino Covi

  • Syndromes of psychosis

    Maurice Lorr;C. James Klett;Douglas M. McNair

  • An interpersonal behavior circle.

    Maurice Lorr;Douglas M. McNair

  • Two EITS Manual for the Profile of Mood States (1971 & 1992)

    Douglas McNair;Maurice Lorr;Leo Droppleman

  • Simulated public speaking as a model of clinical anxiety

    Douglas M. McNair;Laura M. Frankenthaler;Thomas Czerlinsky;Thomas W. White

  • Expansion of the interpersonal behavior circle.

    Maurice Lorr;Douglas M. McNair

  • Therapist "type" and patient response to psychotherapy.

    Douglas M. McNair;Daniel M. Callahan;Maurice Lorr

  • Evidence for bipolar mood states

    Maurice Lorr;Douglas M. McNair;Seymour Fisher

  • Profile of Mood States (POMS)

    Douglas McNair;Maurice Lorr;Leo Droppleman

  • Antianxiety drugs and human performance.

    Douglas M. McNair

  • Symptomatic volunteers in multicenter drug trials.

    Lino Covi;Ronald S. Lipman;Douglas M. McNair;Thomas Czerlinsky

  • EARLY EFFECTS OF CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE (LIBRIUM) USED WITH PSYCHOTHERAPY.

    Maurice Lorr;Douglas M. McNair;George J. Weinstein

  • Evidence of ten psychotic syndromes.

    Lorr M;McNAIR Dm;Klett Cj;Lasky Jj

  • Patient and therapist influences on quitting psychotherapy.

    Douglas M. McNair;Maurice Lorr;Daniel M. Callahan

  • Meprobamate and chlorpromazine in psychotherapy. Some effects on anxiety and hostility of outpatients.

    Maurice Lorr;Douglas M. McNAIR;George J. Weinstein;William W. Michaux

  • Interpersonal types among psychiatric patients.

    Maurice Lorr;Patricia F. Bishop;Douglas M. McNair

  • A comparison of alprazolam and imipramine in the treatment of agoraphobia and panic disorder.

    Rizley R;Kahn Rj;McNair Dm;Frankenthaler Lm

  • An analysis of professed psychotherapeutic techniques.

    Unknown

  • Frequency of treatment and change in psychotherapy.

    Lorr M;McNAIR Dm;Michaux Ww;Raskin A

Frequent Co-Authors

Giulio Perugi
Giulio Perugi University of Pisa
Giovanni B. Cassano
Giovanni B. Cassano University of Pisa
Hagop S. Akiskal
Hagop S. Akiskal University of California, San Diego
Icro Maremmani
Icro Maremmani University of Pisa
Steven E. Arnold
Steven E. Arnold Harvard University
Karl Rickels
Karl Rickels University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in psychology opens multiple pathways for advanced study and professional roles, especially in fields like counseling, therapy, and social work. Online learning has become more accessible and affordable, making it easier for students to pursue these career opportunities while balancing work or family commitments.

Social work in particular offers a popular and impactful career path. Those interested can explore most affordable online social work degree programs in Kentucky to find accessible options in this growing field. For residents of Massachusetts, there are also a range of affordable online social work degrees in Massachusetts, making it more convenient to earn a degree from home.

The Southern U.S. provides several cheapest online msw degrees in the South, which can help graduates advance into clinical or administrative roles in social services. Similarly, those seeking to study in the Southwest can consider affordable online social work master's degrees in Texas, expanding career options in both public and private sectors.

Exploring these affordable online programs can be a smart step for psychology graduates looking to specialize and make an impact in mental health and social support professions.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas M. McNair

Recently Published Articles