World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
50
Citations
13184
World Ranking
17452
National Ranking
7164

Donald H. Dean publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald H. Dean sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 136 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Donald H. Dean D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald H. Dean sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Donald H. Dean is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Throughout their career, they have focused on advancing scientific knowledge through a variety of research endeavors. Their work has contributed to multiple areas within academia, although specific publication and topic details have not been listed.

The scientist is recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), an honor awarded in 2012. This distinction highlights their involvement and standing within the broader scientific community.

While details on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields, subfields, and topics of work are not provided, their affiliation with a major research university suggests active participation in academic research and education.

Best Publications

  • Bacillus thuringiensis and Its Pesticidal Crystal Proteins

    E. Schnepf;N. Crickmore;J. Van Rie;D. Lereclus

  • Revision of the Nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis Pesticidal Crystal Proteins

    N. Crickmore;D. R. Zeigler;J. Feitelson;E. Schnepf

  • Location of a Bombyx mori receptor binding region on a Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin.

    Mi Kyong Lee;R. E. Milne;A. Z. Ge;D. H. Dean

  • Expression of a gene encoding a scorpion insectotoxin peptide in yeast, bacteria and plants.

    Sheng-Zhi Pang;Stephanie M. Oberhaus;Jeanette L. Rasmussen;Douglas C. Knipple

  • Functional domains of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal proteins. Refinement of Heliothis virescens and Trichoplusia ni specificity domains on CryIA(c).

    A Z Ge;D Rivers;R Milne;D H Dean

  • Location of the Bombyx mori specificity domain on a Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin protein.

    Albert Z. Ge;Nedka I. Shivarova;Donald H. Dean

  • Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA delta-endotoxins in a laboratory-selected Heliothis virescens strain is related to receptor alteration.

    M K Lee;F Rajamohan;F L Gould;D H Dean

  • Functional significance of loops in the receptor binding domain of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIIIA delta-endotoxin.

    Sheng-Jiun Wu;Donald H. Dean

  • Bivalent Sequential Binding Model of a Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin to Gypsy Moth Aminopeptidase N Receptor

    Jeremy L. Jenkins;Mi Kyong Lee;Algimantas P. Valaitis;April Curtiss

  • Domain III exchanges of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA toxins affect binding to different gypsy moth midgut receptors.

    M.K. Lee;B.A. Young;D.H. Dean

  • Brush border membrane aminopeptidase-n in the midgut of the gypsy moth serves as the receptor for the CryIA(c) δ-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis

    Algimantas P. Valaitis;Mi Kyong Lee;Francis Rajamohan;Donald H. Dean

  • Site-directed mutations in a highly conserved region of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin affect inhibition of short circuit current across Bombyx mori midguts.

    Xue Jun Chen;Mi K. Lee;Donald H. Dean

  • Molecular basis for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin specificity: two structural determinants in the Manduca sexta Bt-R1 receptor interact with loops alpha-8 and 2 in domain II of Cy1Ab toxin

    Isabel Gómez;Donald H. Dean;and Alejandra Bravo;Mario Soberón

  • Single amino acid changes in domain II of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAb delta-endotoxin affect irreversible binding to Manduca sexta midgut membrane vesicles.

    F. Rajamohan;E. Alcantara;M. K. Lee;Xue Jun Chen

  • Protein engineering of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin: Mutations at domain II of CryIAb enhance receptor affinity and toxicity toward gypsy moth larvae

    Francis Rajamohan;Oscar Alzate;Jeffrey A. Cotrill;April Curtiss

  • Irreversible Binding Kinetics of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA δ-Endotoxins to Gypsy Moth Brush Border Membrane Vesicles Is Directly Correlated to Toxicity

    Yizhi Liang;Smita S. Patel;Donald H. Dean

  • Mutations in domain I of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin CryIAb reduce the irreversible binding of toxin to manduca sexta brush border membrane vesicles.

    Xue Jun Chen;April Curtiss;Edwin Alcantara;Donald H. Dean

  • Identification of amino acid residues of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin CryIAa associated with membrane binding and toxicity to Bombyx mori.

    Hong Lu;F. Rajamohan;D. H. Dean

  • Probing the mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins by site-directed mutagenesis — a minireview

    D.H. Dean;F. Rajamohan;M.K. Lee;S.-J. Wu

  • Role of Domain II, Loop 2 Residues of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAb δ-Endotoxin in Reversible and Irreversible Binding to Manduca sexta and Heliothis virescens

    Francis Rajamohan;Jeffrey A. Cotrill;Fred Gould;Donald H. Dean

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Gould
Fred Gould North Carolina State University
Michael J. Adang
Michael J. Adang University of Georgia
Sheikh Riazuddin
Sheikh Riazuddin University of Health Sciences Lahore
Russ Hille
Russ Hille University of California, Riverside
Didier Lereclus
Didier Lereclus University of Paris-Saclay
Michael C. Ostrowski
Michael C. Ostrowski Medical University of South Carolina
Alejandra Bravo
Alejandra Bravo National Autonomous University of Mexico
Jo Handelsman
Jo Handelsman University of Wisconsin–Madison
David L. Denlinger
David L. Denlinger The Ohio State University
James A. Hoch
James A. Hoch Scripps Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse careers, many of which can be supported through flexible online education. From healthcare data to clinical diagnostics, these fields are constantly evolving and require specialized knowledge.

For students interested in combining science and data technology, pursuing a health information management degree can build expertise in medical data systems and patient records management. Those aiming to focus on nutrition science and its impact on health can consider an online masters degree in nutrition to prepare for consultancy or research roles.

Careers in medical imaging are also accessible online. Programs like ultrasound tech certification online offer flexible training for roles in diagnostic imaging. Additionally, students can consider the cheapest radiology tech programs to quickly start a career as a radiologic technologist.

These online degrees provide flexible, affordable pathways that complement biological and biochemical studies, helping launch a successful career in the vibrant health and science sector.

Best Scientists Citing Donald H. Dean

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles