World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 68 2178 179 196 15330

David J. Ellar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David J. Ellar between 1966 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David J. Ellar published across 49 years, from 1966 to 2014, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1988. 3 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1988. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 2 publications 1968: 3 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 6 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 6 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication
1966 2014

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David J. Ellar: publications per year, 1966 to 2014
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 2
1968 3
1969 0
1970 0
1971 2
1972 2
1973 1
1974 6
1975 3
1976 0
1977 6
1978 5
1979 1
1980 3
1981 1
1982 6
1983 8
1984 3
1985 7
1986 6
1987 9
1988 10
1989 10
1990 6
1991 8
1992 3
1993 7
1994 9
1995 4
1996 5
1997 6
1998 4
1999 6
2000 4
2001 4
2002 3
2003 5
2004 5
2005 6
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 1
2010 2
2011 0
2012 0
2013 2
2014 1
Total 196
Download as CSV

David J. Ellar publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Ellar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 196 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234 196
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

David J. Ellar D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Ellar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103 68
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology General Microbiology

Overview

David J. Ellar was affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their academic career focused on microbiology, as reflected by their recognition as a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology in 2001, specifically for contributions within General Microbiology.

While detailed data on publications, including recent papers and frequent venues, are not available, the recorded award highlights a specialization and impact in microbiological research. There are no listed frequent co-authors or documented collaborative networks to elaborate on.

The absence of information on specific subfields or main topics of study suggests the publicly available data primarily emphasize the broader field of microbiology without further granularity.

Similarly, no information on book publications or detailed research areas beyond the award citation was provided. The scientist is deceased, and the profile reflects a summary of known affiliations and recognitions.

Best Publications

  • Crystal structure of insecticidal delta-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis at 2.5 A resolution.

    Jade Li;Joe Carroll;David J. Ellar

  • Role of Receptors in Bacillus thuringiensis Crystal Toxin Activity

    Craig R. Pigott;David J. Ellar

  • Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis crystal delta-endotoxin: effects on insect and mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo

    Wendy E. Thomas;David J. Ellar

  • Colloid-osmotic lysis is a general feature of the mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins with different insect specificity

    Barbara H. Knowles;David J. Ellar

  • The receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CrylA(c) delta-endotoxin in the brush border membrane of the lepidopteran Manduca sexta is aminopeptidase N

    Peter J. K. Knight;Neil Crickmore;David J. Ellar

  • Commitment of bacterial spores to germinate. A measure of the trigger reaction.

    G S Stewart;K Johnstone;E Hagelberg;D J Ellar

  • Mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis insecticidal δ‐endotoxin

    W.E. Thomas;D.J. Ellar

  • Crystal structure of the mosquito-larvicidal toxin Cry4Ba and its biological implications.

    Panadda Boonserm;Paul Davis;David J. Ellar;Jade Li

  • Structure of the mosquitocidal delta-endotoxin CytB from Bacillus thuringiensis sp. kyushuensis and implications for membrane pore formation.

    Jade Li;Pandelakis A. Koni;David J. Ellar

  • Molecular Cloning of an Insect Aminopeptidase N That Serves as a Receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(c) Toxin

    Peter J.K. Knight;Barbara H. Knowles;David J. Ellar

  • N-acetylgalactosamine on the putative insect receptor aminopeptidase N is recognised by a site on the domain III lectin-like fold of a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxin.

    Sarah L Burton;David J Ellar;Jade Li;Dean J Derbyshire

  • Contribution of the individual components of the δ-endotoxin crystal to the mosquitocidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis

    Neil Crickmore;Neil Crickmore;Eileen J. Bone;Juliet A. Williams;David J. Ellar

  • Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. colmeri insecticidal delta-endotoxin is determined by differential proteolytic processing of the protoxin by larval gut proteases.

    Muhammad Z. Haider;Barbara H. Knowles;David J. Ellar

  • Comparative toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis crystal proteins in vivo and in vitro.

    Chris N. Chilcott;David J. Ellar

  • A cytolytic δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis forms cation-selective channels in planar lipid bilayers

    Barbara H. Knowles;Michael R. Blatt;Mark Tester;Jane M. Horsnell

  • Surface plasmon resonance analysis at a supported lipid monolayer

    Matthew A. Cooper;Andrew C. Try;Joe Carroll;David J. Ellar

  • Transgenic Drosophila reveals a functional in vivo receptor for the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac1.

    Michael Gill;David Ellar

  • An analysis of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin action on insect-midgut-membrane permeability using a light-scattering assay

    Joe Carroll;David J. Ellar

  • Proteolytic processing of a coleopteran-specific delta-endotoxin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis.

    J Carroll;J Li;D J Ellar

  • Lectin-like binding of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki lepidopteran-specific toxin is an initial step in insecticidal action.

    B.H. Knowles;W.E. Thomas;D.J. Ellar

  • Recombinant production of bacterial toxins and their derivatives in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris.

    Cemal Gurkan;Cemal Gurkan;David J Ellar

Frequent Co-Authors

Francis Drobniewski
Francis Drobniewski Imperial College London
Pandelakis A. Koni
Pandelakis A. Koni Elixiron Immunotherapeutics (Taiwan)
Dudley H. Williams
Dudley H. Williams University of Cambridge
Mark E. Cooper
Mark E. Cooper Monash University
Mark Tester
Mark Tester King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Damian Smedley
Damian Smedley Queen Mary University of London
Juan Ferré
Juan Ferré University of Valencia
Andrew Travers
Andrew Travers MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Tim Hubbard
Tim Hubbard King's College London
Michael Gill
Michael Gill Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways for those interested in microbiology and health sciences. For example, earning a ccls certification can lead to specialized roles supporting children’s healthcare experiences. This certification offers a meaningful way to blend science with patient care and advocacy.

For individuals with a criminal record looking to advance their education, the list of best degrees for felons highlights programs that provide flexibility and accessibility. Many of these programs promote career growth in healthcare and science fields, making them a viable option for overcoming barriers.

Another promising route is becoming a functional medicine nurse. This career focuses on holistic patient care and combines nursing expertise with integrated medical approaches, often requiring specialized training and certification available online.

Additionally, a certified professional coder plays a crucial role in healthcare administration. This credential supports accurate medical billing and data management, which are vital skills in any healthcare setting tied to microbiology research and clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Ellar

Recently Published Articles