World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
7600
World Ranking
13373
National Ranking
5355

Demetrio Labate publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Demetrio Labate sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 127 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Demetrio Labate D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Demetrio Labate sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Demetrio Labate is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Engineering, Computer Science, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Computational Mechanics, Biophysics, and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

The main topics covered in their work include Cell Image Analysis Techniques, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, Image and Signal Denoising Methods, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques, Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques, and Astro and Planetary Science.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Michela Marini, Kazem Safari, Cihan Bilge Kayasandık, Tatiana A. Bubba, and Tommi Heikkilä.

Demetrio Labate has published papers in various venues, often contributing to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scientific Reports
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Acta Astronautica
  • IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters

Some notable recent publications include:

  • A Multiscale Deep Learning Approach for High-Resolution Hyperspectral Image Classification, 2020, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
  • LUMIO: A CubeSat for observing and characterizing micro-meteoroid impacts on the Lunar far side, 2022, Acta Astronautica
  • A multistep deep learning framework for the automated detection and segmentation of astrocytes in fluorescent images of brain tissue, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • High throughput microscopy and single cell phenotypic image-based analysis in toxicology and drug discovery, 2023, Biochemical Pharmacology
  • Meteoroids detection with the LUMIO lunar CubeSat, 2022, Icarus

Best Publications

  • Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform

    Glenn Easley;Demetrio Labate;Wang-Q Lim

  • OPTIMALLY SPARSE MULTIDIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATION USING SHEARLETS

    Kanghui Guo;Demetrio Labate

  • Sparse multidimensional representation using shearlets

    Demetrio Labate;Wang-Q. Lim;Gitta Kutyniok;Guido Weiss

  • A Shearlet Approach to Edge Analysis and Detection

    Sheng Yi;D. Labate;G.R. Easley;H. Krim

  • Shearlets: Multiscale Analysis for Multivariate Data

    Gitta Kutyniok;Demetrio Labate

  • Resolution of the wavefront set using continuous shearlets

    Gitta Kutyniok;Demetrio Labate

  • Wavelets with composite dilations and their MRA properties

    Kanghui Guo;Demetrio Labate;Wang-Q Lim;Guido Weiss

  • Shearlet-Based Total Variation Diffusion for Denoising

    G.R. Easley;D. Labate;F. Colonna

  • A unified characterization of reproducing systems generated by a finite family, II

    Eugenio Hernández;Demetrio Labate;Guido Weiss

  • Edge analysis and identification using the continuous shearlet transform

    Kanghui Guo;Demetrio Labate;Wang Q. Lim

  • Wavelets with composite dilations

    Kanghui Guo;Demetrio Labate;Wang Q. Lim;Guido Weiss

  • Introduction to Shearlets

    Gitta Kutyniok;Demetrio Labate

  • Characterization and Analysis of Edges Using the Continuous Shearlet Transform

    Kanghui Guo;Demetrio Labate

  • A unified characterization of reproducing systems generated by a finite family

    Unknown

  • The Construction of Smooth Parseval Frames of Shearlets

    Kanghui Guo;D. Labate

  • 3-D Discrete Shearlet Transform and Video Processing

    P. S. Negi;D. Labate

  • Radon Transform Inversion using the Shearlet Representation

    Flavia Colonna;Glenn Easley;Kanghui Guo;Demetrio Labate

  • Pseudodifferential Operators on Modulation Spaces

    Demetrio Labate

  • Oversampling, quasi-affine frames, and wave packets

    Eugenio Hernández;Demetrio Labate;Guido Weiss;Edward Wilson

  • Representation of Fourier Integral Operators Using Shearlets

    Kanghui Guo;Demetrio Labate

  • The Theory of Wavelets with Composite Dilations

    Kanghui Guo;Demetrio Labate;Wang-Q Lim;Guido Weiss

Frequent Co-Authors

Gitta Kutyniok
Gitta Kutyniok Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Guido Weiss
Guido Weiss Washington University in St. Louis
Stephan Dahlke
Stephan Dahlke Philipp University of Marburg
Saurabh Prasad
Saurabh Prasad University of Houston
Vishal M. Patel
Vishal M. Patel Johns Hopkins University
Philipp Grohs
Philipp Grohs University of Vienna
Ioannis A. Kakadiaris
Ioannis A. Kakadiaris University of Houston
Hamid Krim
Hamid Krim North Carolina State University
Rama Chellappa
Rama Chellappa Johns Hopkins University
Flavio Canavero
Flavio Canavero Polytechnic University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in Computer Science can open up flexible pathways for students of all backgrounds. If you’re seeking a quick start, consider earning an online associate degree. This provides foundational knowledge and can be a stepping stone to more advanced studies.

For those looking to maximize their career prospects, pursuing one of the most valuable masters degrees in the field is a smart investment. These programs often lead to high-growth roles in software development, data analysis, and more.

Cost is another key factor. Luckily, there are many options among the cheapest online degrees, making quality computer science education accessible on various budgets.

Lastly, don’t let your past academic performance hold you back. Several online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa are available, providing opportunities for motivated students to advance their careers, regardless of prior GPA.

Best Scientists Citing Demetrio Labate

Trending Scientists