World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
55
Citations
14411
World Ranking
2253
National Ranking
24

David Yaffe publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Yaffe sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 105 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

David Yaffe D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Yaffe sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

David Yaffe was affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. Their research expertise primarily spanned the field of Medicine, with subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, and Internal Medicine.

Their body of work addressed several focused topics mainly related to vascular health and complications. These included:

  • Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Yaffe contributed to scientific literature with research published in venues such as JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. One of the recent papers published in 2025 was titled "700.56 Outcomes of Single Versus Double Perclose Suture Device Use After Transfemoral Transcatheter Procedures Using Large Bore Arterial Access: A Meta-Analysis," appearing in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

The scientist often collaborated with colleagues including Priyesh Thakurathi, Khagendra Dahal, Maria Nana, Immad Sadiq, and Bryan Piccirillo, each appearing as co-authors on publications.

David Yaffe was recognized as a member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO), reflecting involvement in broader scientific communities.

Best Publications

  • Serial passaging and differentiation of myogenic cells isolated from dystrophic mouse muscle

    David Yaffe;Ora Saxel

  • The nucleotide sequence of the rat cytoplasmic β–actin gene

    U Nudel;R. Zakut;M. Shani;S. Neuman

  • Retention of differentiation potentialities during prolonged cultivation of myogenic cells

    David Yaffe

  • The in vitro cultivation and differentiation capacities of myogenic cell lines.

    Carmelit Richler;David Yaffe

  • Alterations of enzymatic activities during muscle differentiation in vitro.

    Asher Shainberg;Gad Yagil;David Yaffe

  • A Myogenic Cell Line with Altered Serum Requirements for Differentiation

    D. Yaffe;O. Saxel

  • A 71-kilodalton protein is a major product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene in brain and other nonmuscle tissues.

    Doron Lederfein;Zehava Levy;Natalie Augier;Dominique Mornet

  • Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene product is not identical in muscle and brain

    Uri Nudel;Dorit Zuk;Paz Einat;Elisha Zeelon

  • Cellular aspects of muscle differentiation in vitro.

    David Yaffe

  • Control of myogenesis in vitro by Ca2+ concentration in nutrittonal medium☆

    A. Shainberg;G. Yagil;D. Yaffe

  • A novel product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene which greatly differs from the known isoforms in its structure and tissue distribution

    S Bar;E Barnea;Z Levy;S Neuman

  • Nucleotide sequence of the rat skeletal muscle actin gene.

    R. Zakut;M. Shani;D. Givol;S. Neuman

  • Developmental changes preceding cell fusion during muscle differentiation in vitro

    D. Yaffe

  • Expression of the putative Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene in differentiated myogenic cell cultures and in the brain.

    Uri Nudel;Kenneth Robzyk;David Yaffe

  • THE FORMATION OF HYBRID MULTINUCLEATED MUSCLE FIBERS FROM MYOBLASTS OF DIFFERENT GENETIC ORIGIN.

    David Yaffe;Michael Feldman

  • Highly conserved sequences in the 3' untranslated region of mRNAs coding for homologous proteins in distantly related species.

    David Yaffe;Uri Nudel;Yitzhak Mayer;Sara Neuman

  • Exogenous Dp71 restores the levels of dystrophin associated proteins but does not alleviate muscle damage in mdx mice

    David S. Greenberg;Yoshihide Sunada;Kevin P. Campbell;David Yaffe

  • Expression of the genes coding for the skeletal muscle and cardiac actins in the heart

    Y. Mayer;H. Czosnek;P.E. Zeelon;D. Yaffe

  • Targeted inactivation of dystrophin gene product Dp71: phenotypic impact in mouse retina

    Cécile Dalloz;Rachel Sarig;Patrice Fort;David Yaffe

  • Dissecting muscle and neuronal disorders in a Drosophila model of muscular dystrophy.

    Halyna R Shcherbata;Andriy S Yatsenko;Andriy S Yatsenko;Larissa Patterson;Vanita D Sood

Frequent Co-Authors

Uri Nudel
Uri Nudel Weizmann Institute of Science
Henryk Czosnek
Henryk Czosnek Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Michael Feldman
Michael Feldman Weizmann Institute of Science
Patrice Fort
Patrice Fort University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andreas Reichenbach
Andreas Reichenbach Leipzig University
Thomas Pannicke
Thomas Pannicke Leipzig University
Frank H. Ruddle
Frank H. Ruddle Yale University
José-Alain Sahel
José-Alain Sahel University of Pittsburgh
David Givol
David Givol Weizmann Institute of Science
Jamel Chelly
Jamel Chelly Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can be a strategic choice for those interested in careers related to Molecular Biology. Many professionals consider nursing pathways, with programs designed to build on previous education and experience for increased flexibility and career mobility.

For registered nurses looking to advance their qualifications, asn to np programs offer a bridge from an associate degree in nursing (ADN) directly to a nurse practitioner (NP) role. These programs help fast-track career advancement with online coursework.

If you have a non-nursing background but want to enter the nursing profession quickly, consider direct entry msn programs for non nurses online. These programs are designed for students from various academic fields, including biology, allowing for a transition into healthcare.

Choosing the right online program is important for career success. Comparing schools like chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program can help you find the best fit based on flexibility, reputation, and cost.

For registered nurses looking to become advanced practice nurses or move into leadership roles, the bsn to msn bridge programs offer affordable and convenient progression options.

Best Scientists Citing David Yaffe

Recently Published Articles