World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4623
World Ranking
8852
National Ranking
3745

David W. Shucard publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Shucard sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 102 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David W. Shucard D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Shucard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

David W. Shucard is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research concentrates in the field of neuroscience, with a primary focus on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields such as pathology and forensic medicine, neurology, developmental neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Recent publications of David W. Shucard include:

  • History of Playing Video Games is Associated with Better Neuropsychological Performance in People with Multiple Sclerosis, 2024, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
  • Single trial variability in neural activity during a working memory task reveals multiple distinct information processing sequences, 2023, NeuroImage
  • Cognitive skill learning in multiple sclerosis: A meaningful component of the neuropsychological profile, 2023, Brain and Cognition
  • Single trial variability in neural activity during a working memory task reveals multiple distinct information processing sequences, 2022, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Single trial variability in neural activity during a working memory task: A window into multiple distinct information processing sequences, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • NeuroImage
  • Brain and Cognition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Cognitive Enhancement

David W. Shucard collaborates often with the following researchers:

  • Thomas J. Covey
  • Janet L. Shucard
  • Johan Nakuci
  • Sarah F. Muldoon
  • Ryan O'Donnell

They were awarded the distinction of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1997.

Best Publications

  • Animal Models of Human Behavior

    Linda S. Crnic;Martin L. Reite;David W. Shucard

  • Effects of low level lead exposure on cognitive function in children: a review of behavioral, neuropsychological and biological evidence.

    E C Banks;L E Ferretti;D W Shucard

  • Neuropsychological effects of interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group.

    Fischer Js;Priore Rl;Jacobs Ld;Cookfair Dl

  • The significance of MRI abnormalities in children with neurofibromatosis

    P. K. Duffner;M. E. Cohen;F. G. Seidel;D. W. Shucard

  • An electrophysiological study of infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of English speech

    Valerie L. Shafer;David W. Shucard;Janet L. Shucard;Lou Ann Gerken

  • Evoked cortical potentials and measurement of human abilities.

    David Wm. Shucard;John L. Horn

  • Semantic comprehension in infancy: a signal detection analysis.

    David G. Thomas;Joseph J. Campos;David W. Shucard;Douglas S. Ramsay

  • The neuropsychological phenotype in Turner syndrome.

    Bruce F. Pennington;Robert K. Heaton;Peter Karzmark;Mark G. Pendleton

  • Sex-related differences in event-related potentials, face recognition, and facial affect processing in prepubertal children.

    Everhart De;Shucard Jl;Quatrin T;Shucard Dw

  • Stimulus modality and Go/NoGo effects on P3 during parallel visual and auditory continuous performance tasks.

    Ayda Tekok-Kilic;Janet L. Shucard;David W. Shucard

  • Functional neuroimaging of attention in the auditory modality.

    Ralph H.b. Benedict;Alan H. Lockwood;Janet L. Shucard;David W. Shucard

  • Auditory evoked potentials as probes of hemispheric differences in cognitive processing.

    DW Shucard;JL Shucard;DG Thomas

  • Auditory evoked potentials and sex-related differences in brain development.

    J.L Shucard;D.W Shucard;K.R Cummins;J.J Campos

  • Working memory deficits in multiple sclerosis: comparison between the n-back task and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test.

    Brett A. Parmenter;Janet L. Shucard;Ralph H.B. Benedict;David W. Shucard

  • Working memory and processing speed deficits in systemic lupus erythematosus as measured by the paced auditory serial addition test.

    Janet L. Shucard;Joy Parrish;David W. Shucard;Danielle C. McCABE

  • Information processing deficits in multiple sclerosis: a matter of complexity.

    Brett A. Parmenter;Janet L. Shucard;David W. Shucard

  • The effects of exposure to traumatic stressors on inhibitory control in police officers: a dense electrode array study using a Go/NoGo continuous performance task.

    Thomas J. Covey;Janet L. Shucard;John M. Violanti;Jeff Lee

  • Observations on patterns of subjective symptomatology of acute asthma.

    Robert A. Kinsman;Sheldon L. Spector;David W. Shucard;Thomas J. Luparello

  • Neuropsychological Impairment in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Comparison with Multiple Sclerosis

    R. H. B. Benedict;J. L. Shucard;R. Zivadinov;D. W. Shucard

  • Brain-reactive autoantibody levels in the sera of ageing autoimmune mice.

    S A Hoffman;D N Arbogast;P M Ford;D W Shucard

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph H.B. Benedict
Ralph H.B. Benedict University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Robert Zivadinov
Robert Zivadinov University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Niels Bergsland
Niels Bergsland University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Michael G. Dwyer
Michael G. Dwyer University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Daniel B. Rifkin
Daniel B. Rifkin New York University
Joseph J. Campos
Joseph J. Campos University of California, Berkeley
Sheldon L. Spector
Sheldon L. Spector University of California, Los Angeles
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Jordan Grafman
Jordan Grafman Northwestern University
LouAnn Gerken
LouAnn Gerken University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience doesn’t have to be limited to traditional pathways. Many students consider online degrees and certifications to expand their career options and flexibility. If you’re aiming for a lucrative career, it’s worth reviewing the majors that make the most money and seeing how neuroscience aligns with these high-demand fields.

For those budgeting their education, enrolling at one of the best online colleges that accept fafsa can help make a degree more affordable. Online education also makes it easier to balance work, family, and study commitments—especially by choosing one of the what is the easiest degree to get online options as a starting point.

Beyond degrees, specialized online certification courses can deliver valuable skills in neuroscience and related fields. These certifications can boost your resume and support transitions into research, healthcare, or technology roles tied to brain science. Whether you are seeking high pay, flexibility, or accessible entry points, there are many online pathways to build a rewarding neuroscience career.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Shucard

Trending Scientists