World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
3052
World Ranking
11406
National Ranking
494

David Mann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Mann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Mann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Mann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Action specificity increases anticipatory performance and the expert advantage in natural interceptive tasks.

    David L. Mann;Bruce Abernethy;Bruce Abernethy;Damian Farrow

  • The head tracks and gaze predicts: how the world's best batters hit a ball.

    David L. Mann;David L. Mann;Wayne Spratford;Bruce Abernethy;Bruce Abernethy

  • Modified perceptual training in sport: A new classification framework

    Stephen Mark Hadlow;Stephen Mark Hadlow;Derek Panchuk;David Lindsay Mann;Marc Ronald Portus

  • Age-ordered shirt numbering reduces the selection bias associated with the relative age effect

    Unknown

  • The role of central and peripheral vision in expert decision-making

    Donghyun Ryu;Bruce Abernethy;David L Mann;Jamie M Poolton

  • Does Visual-Perceptual Training Augment the Fielding Performance of Skilled Cricketers?:

    Melissa J. Hopwood;Melissa J. Hopwood;David L. Mann;David L. Mann;Damian Farrow;Damian Farrow;Tim Nielsen

  • But I can't pass that far! The influence of motor skill on decision making

    Lyndell Bruce;Lyndell Bruce;Lyndell Bruce;Damian Farrow;Damian Farrow;Annette Raynor;Annette Raynor;David Mann;David Mann

  • Time to broaden the scope of research on anticipatory behavior: a case for the role of probabilistic information

    Unknown

  • Guiding Attention Aids the Acquisition of Anticipatory Skill in Novice Soccer Goalkeepers

    Donghyun Ryu;Seonjin Kim;Bruce Abernethy;David L. Mann

  • Searching for the elusive gift: advances in talent identification in sport.

    David L Mann;Nima Dehghansai;Joseph Baker

  • Action preferences and the anticipation of action outcomes

    Unknown

  • The resilience of natural interceptive actions to refractive blur

    David L. Mann;Bruce Abernethy;Bruce Abernethy;Damian Farrow

  • Expert consensus statement to guide the evidence-based classification of Paralympic athletes with vision impairment: a Delphi study

    Unknown

  • Visual information underpinning skilled anticipation: the effect of blur on a coupled and uncoupled in-situ anticipatory response

    David L. Mann;David L. Mann;Bruce Abernethy;Bruce Abernethy;Damian Farrow

  • Is optimal vision required for the successful execution of an interceptive task?

    Unknown

  • Perceptual-cognitive skill and the in situ performance of soccer players.

    Mariëtte J. J. van Maarseveen;Raôul R. D. Oudejans;David L. Mann;Geert J. P. Savelsbergh

  • Integrating situational probability and kinematic information when anticipating disguised movements

    Fabian Helm;Rouwen Cañal-Bruland;David L. Mann;Nikolaus F. Troje

  • The contributions of central and peripheral vision to expertise in basketball: How blur helps to provide a clearer picture.

    Donghyun Ryu;Bruce Abernethy;David L. Mann;Jamie M. Poolton

  • Classifying the evidence for evidence-based classification in Paralympic sport

    David L. Mann;Sean M. Tweedy;Robin C. Jackson;Yves C. Vanlandewijck

  • The Development of Evidence-Based Classification of Vision Impairment in Judo: A Delphi Study

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew J. Farrer
Matthew J. Farrer University of Florida
Takashi Nonaka
Takashi Nonaka Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science
Nigel M. Hooper
Nigel M. Hooper Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Julie S. Snowden
Julie S. Snowden University of Manchester
Alexander Gerhard
Alexander Gerhard University of Manchester
Jennifer C. Thompson
Jennifer C. Thompson University of Manchester
Alan Pittman
Alan Pittman St George's, University of London
Mike Hutton
Mike Hutton Eli Lilly (United States)
Garth J. S. Cooper
Garth J. S. Cooper University of Auckland

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David Mann

Recently Published Articles