World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
5492
World Ranking
5920
National Ranking
2013

David J. Anderson publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 131 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David J. Anderson D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Anderson is affiliated with Wake Forest University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with significant contributions to subfields such as Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Public Administration, General Health Professions, and Global and Planetary Change.

The research topics covered by Anderson include:

  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Work Education and Practice
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Anderson's recent papers reflect a range of interests in ecology and social work:

  • "Global political responsibility for the conservation of albatrosses and large petrels" (2021), published in Science Advances
  • "Involving service users in social work education, research and policy: a comparative European analysis" (2022), published in European Journal of Social Work
  • "Seabird morphology determines operational wind speeds, tolerable maxima, and responses to extremes" (2023), published in Current Biology
  • "Age of First Territory Settlement of Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos in a Variable Competitive Landscape" (2022), published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • "Non-territorial GPS-tagged golden eagles Aquila chrysaetos at two Scottish wind farms: Avoidance influenced by preferred habitat distribution, wind speed and blade motion status" (2021), published in PLoS ONE

The frequent co-authors working with Anderson include:

  • Stuart Benn
  • Ewan Weston
  • D. Philip Whitfield
  • Alan H. Fielding
  • Ruth Tingay

The scientist regularly publishes in venues such as:

  • European Journal of Social Work
  • Diversity
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • PLoS ONE

Anderson's body of work includes multidisciplinary research spanning ecological studies of birds, especially avian morphology and behavior, alongside explorations in social work education and policy. The cross-disciplinary approach is reflected in both the topics and publication outlets, ranging from ecology and conservation journals to social work publications.

Best Publications

  • Oceanographic habitats of two sympatric North Pacific albatrosses during the breeding season

    K. David Hyrenbach;Patricia Fernández;David J. Anderson

  • THE ORIGIN AND DIVERSIFICATION OF GALAPAGOS MOCKINGBIRDS

    Brian S. Arbogast;Brian S. Arbogast;Brian S. Arbogast;Sergei V. Drovetski;Robert L. Curry;Peter T. Boag

  • Comparison of light- and SST-based geolocation with satellite telemetry in free-ranging albatrosses

    Scott A. Shaffer;Yann Tremblay;Jill A. Awkerman;R. William Henry

  • Sexual size dimorphism and food requirements of nestling birds

    David J. Anderson;Jo Reeve;Juan E. Martinez Gomez;Wesley W. Weathers

  • Sexually dimorphic eggs, nestling growth and sibling competition in American Kestrels Falco sparverius

    D. J. Anderson;J. Reeve;D. M. Bird

  • Predictors of Juvenile Survival in Birds

    Terri J. Maness;David J. Anderson

  • Evolution of Obligate Siblicide in Boobies. 1. A Test of the Insurance-Egg Hypothesis

    David J. Anderson

  • Foraging destinations of three low‐latitude albatross (Phoebastria) species

    Patricia Fernández;David J. Anderson;Paul R. Sievert;Kathryn P. Huyvaert

  • Prey Size Influences Female Competitive Dominance in Nestling American Kestrels (Falco Sparverius)

    David J. Anderson;Christa Budde;Victor Apanius;Juan E. Martinez Gomez

  • Food limitation explains most clutch size variation in the Nazca booby

    L. D. Clifford;D. J. Anderson

  • Incidental and intentional catch threatens Galápagos waved albatross

    Jill A. Awkerman;Kathryn P. Huyvaert;Kathryn P. Huyvaert;Jeffrey Mangel;Joanna Alfaro Shigueto

  • Diel changes in plasma melatonin and corticosterone concentrations in tropical Nazca boobies (Sula granti) in relation to moon phase and age.

    Elisa M. Tarlow;Michaela Hau;David J. Anderson;Martin Wikelski

  • The role of hatching asynchrony in siblicidal brood reduction of two booby species

    D. J. Anderson

  • Wind, waves, and wing loading: morphological specialization may limit range expansion of endangered albatrosses.

    Robert M. Suryan;David J. Anderson;Scott A. Shaffer;Daniel D. Roby

  • Use of marine sanctuaries by far-ranging predators: commuting flights to the California Current System by breeding Hawaiian albatrosses

    K. D. Hyrenbach;C. Keiper;S. G. Allen;D. G. Ainley

  • Limited dispersal by Nazca boobies Sula granti

    Kathryn P. Huyvaert;David J. Anderson

  • Brood Size and Food Provisioning in Masked and Blue‐Footed Boobies (Sula Spp.)

    David J. Anderson;Robert E. Ricklefs

  • Predator behavior favors clumped nesting in an oceanic seabird

    David J. Anderson;Peter J. Hodum

  • Comparative phylogeography of brown (Sula leucogaster) and red-footed boobies (S. sula): the influence of physical barriers and habitat preference on gene flow in pelagic seabirds.

    J.A. Morris-Pocock;T.E. Steeves;F.A. Estela;D.J. Anderson

  • Global political responsibility for the conservation of albatrosses and large petrels

    Martin Beal;Martin Beal;Maria P. Dias;Maria P. Dias;Richard A. Phillips;Steffen Oppel

  • The Isthmus of Panama: a major physical barrier to gene flow in a highly mobile pantropical seabird

    T. E. Steeves;D. J. Anderson;V. L. Friesen

Frequent Co-Authors

Vicki L. Friesen
Vicki L. Friesen Queen's University
Martin Wikelski
Martin Wikelski Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
Robert E. Ricklefs
Robert E. Ricklefs University of Missouri–St. Louis
Wesley W. Weathers
Wesley W. Weathers University of California, Davis
Scott A. Shaffer
Scott A. Shaffer San Jose State University
Yann Tremblay
Yann Tremblay Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Daniel P. Costa
Daniel P. Costa University of California, Santa Cruz
Robert M. Suryan
Robert M. Suryan National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Donald E. Weller
Donald E. Weller Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Patricia G. Parker
Patricia G. Parker University of Missouri–St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens the door to a diverse range of career opportunities—many of which can be accessed or complemented through online education. For those interested in data, research, or information management, pursuing a library science degree online can be a cost-effective choice that aligns well with environmental research roles.

If you are intrigued by communication and human development, there are asha online slp programs offering flexible pathways to become a certified speech-language pathologist. For those without an undergraduate background in speech-language pathology, several slp bridge programs can help facilitate a career switch.

The healthcare sector—relevant to ecology through roles in public health and conservation medicine—also offers accessible learning tracks. Prospective nurses can look into online bsn programs for non nurses, which provide a streamlined route into nursing, even if your previous degree was unrelated.

These flexible, accredited online programs offer valuable ways to expand your skillset and adapt your career to rapidly evolving fields connected to ecology and evolution.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles