World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David F. R. P. Burslem

David F. R. P. Burslem

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 72 1249 1191 167 161 305 16338

David F. R. P. Burslem publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David F. R. P. Burslem between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David F. R. P. Burslem published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2016. 25 of the 355 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2016. 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 1 publication
1994 2026

355 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David F. R. P. Burslem: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 3
1995 3
1996 4
1997 5
1998 4
1999 3
2000 2
2001 2
2002 9
2003 7
2004 2
2005 8
2006 5
2007 8
2008 9
2009 11
2010 5
2011 14
2012 9
2013 5
2014 9
2015 11
2016 44
2017 8
2018 22
2019 16
2020 15
2021 21
2022 19
2023 24
2024 23
2025 24
2026 1
Total 355
Download as CSV

David F. R. P. Burslem publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. R. P. Burslem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 302–306 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 305 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38 305
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

David F. R. P. Burslem D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. R. P. Burslem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59 72
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

David F. R. P. Burslem is affiliated with the University of Aberdeen in the United Kingdom. Their research is centered around Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a particular focus on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Plant Science, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics of their work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Forest Ecology and Management, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Plant and Animal Studies, Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, as well as Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions.

Several recent publications showcase their involvement in advancing knowledge in ecological and environmental domains. These include:

  • Aboveground biomass density models for NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission, 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network, 2020, Biological Conservation
  • Soil fungal networks maintain local dominance of ectomycorrhizal trees, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Active restoration accelerates the carbon recovery of human-modified tropical forests, 2020, Science
  • Pantropical modelling of canopy functional traits using Sentinel-2 remote sensing data, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment

Burslem has frequently collaborated with several researchers, highlighting connections within the scientific community. Frequent co-authors include Glen Reynolds, Michael J. O'Brien, Reuben Nilus, David A. Coomes, and Sabine Both.

Their research outputs have appeared predominantly in publication venues recognized for ecological and environmental science. These venues include New Phytologist, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Nature Communications.

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • CTFS-ForestGEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Stuart J. Davies;Stuart J. Davies;Amy C. Bennett;Erika B. Gonzalez-Akre

  • The interpretation and misinterpretation of mortality rate measures

    D Sheil;David Francis Robert Philip Burslem;D Alder

  • Ecological information from spatial patterns of plants: insights from point process theory

    Richard Law;Janine Barbel Illian;David Francis Robert Philip Burslem;Georg Gratzer

  • Global importance of large‐diameter trees

    James A. Lutz;Tucker J. Furniss;Daniel J. Johnson;Stuart J. Davies

  • GERMINATION ECOLOGY OF NEOTROPICAL PIONEERS: INTERACTING EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND SEED SIZE

    T. R. H. Pearson;David Francis Robert Philip Burslem;Christopher Mullins;J. W. Dalling;J. W. Dalling

  • Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests

    D. Sheil;David Francis Robert Philip Burslem

  • Topography shapes the structure, composition and function of tropical forest landscapes.

    Tommaso Jucker;Tommaso Jucker;Boris Bongalov;David Frp Burslem;Reuben Nilus

  • The influence of vegetation type, soil properties and precipitation on the composition of soil mite and microbial communities at the landscape scale

    Uffe N. Nielsen;Uffe N. Nielsen;Graham H. R. Osler;Colin D. Campbell;Colin D. Campbell;David F. R. P. Burslem

  • Estimating aboveground biomass in forest and oil palm plantation in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo using ALOS PALSAR data

    Alexandra C. Morel;Sassan S. Saatchi;Yadvinder Malhi;Nicholas J. Berry

  • Topographic position affects the water regime in a semideciduous tropical forest in Panama

    Matthew I. Daws;Christopher E. Mullins;David F.R.P. Burslem;Steven R. Paton

  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network

    Stuart J. Davies;Iveren Abiem;Kamariah Abu Salim;Salomón Aguilar

  • Area-based vs tree-centric approaches to mapping forest carbon in Southeast Asian forests from airborne laser scanning data

    David A. Coomes;Michele Dalponte;Tommaso Jucker;Gregory P. Asner

  • Variation in tropical forest growth rates: combined effects of functional group composition and resource availability

    Timothy R. Baker;Michael D. Swaine;David F.R.P. Burslem

  • Species-habitat associations in a Sri Lankan dipterocarp forest

    C. V. S. Gunatilleke;I. A. U. N. Gunatilleke;S. Esufali;K. E. Harms

  • Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects

    Lan Qie;Lan Qie;Simon L. Lewis;Simon L. Lewis;Martin J.P. Sullivan;Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez

  • Spatial patterns reveal negative density dependence and habitat associations in tropical trees.

    Robert Bagchi;Robert Bagchi;Peter A. Henrys;Patrick E. Brown;Patrick E. Brown;David F R P Burslem

  • Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion

    Wayne Dawson;David Francis Robert Philip Burslem;Phil Hulme

  • Differences in seed germination responses may promote coexistence of four sympatric Piper species

    M. I. Daws;David Francis Robert Philip Burslem;Lora M Crabtree;P. Kirkman

  • NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY INTERACTIONS DETERMINE THE SPATIAL PATTERN OF TROPICAL TREE SEEDLING SURVIVAL

    Simon A. Queenborough;David F. R. P. Burslem;Nancy C. Garwood;Renato Valencia

  • Short-term effects of cyclone impact and long-term recovery of tropical rain forest on Kolombangara, Solomon Islands.

    D. F. R. P. Burslem;T. C. Whitmore;G. C. Brown

  • Responses to nutrient addition among shade-tolerant tree seedlings of lowland tropical rain forest in Singapore.

    David Francis Robert Philip Burslem;P J Grubb;I M Turner

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon L. Lewis
Simon L. Lewis University College London
Reuben Nilus
Reuben Nilus Sabah Forestry Department
Yadvinder Malhi
Yadvinder Malhi University of Oxford
James W. Dalling
James W. Dalling University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David A. Coomes
David A. Coomes University of Cambridge
Oliver L. Phillips
Oliver L. Phillips University of Leeds
Stuart J. Davies
Stuart J. Davies Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Tommaso Jucker
Tommaso Jucker University of Bristol
Terhi Riutta
Terhi Riutta UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a variety of online degree options that can enhance your expertise and expand your career choices. Many students begin at non profit colleges offering flexible, accredited online programs, ensuring quality education with reputable credentials.

If you have a military background or need special support, consider institutions featured among the best online colleges for military. These schools provide resources tailored for active-duty personnel, veterans, and their families.

Ecology and Evolution graduates often pursue interdisciplinary roles. Some advance into community engagement or advocacy by obtaining an advanced degree, like those offered by the best online msw programs. Others specialize in research or consulting by exploring the masters in psychology online route, which can lead to insights into animal behavior, conservation psychology, or environmental education.

Each of these online pathways allows you to tailor your education and advance your career, whether your interests are in science, social impact, or applied research.

Best Scientists Citing David F. R. P. Burslem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles