World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
11540
World Ranking
18253
National Ranking
7458

David E. Graham publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Graham sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 165 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David E. Graham D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Graham sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E. Graham is affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on topics related to climate change, permafrost, and wetland ecosystems.

The scientist has contributed extensively to subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Key thematic areas in their work include climate change and permafrost, peatlands and wetlands ecology, methane hydrates and related phenomena, cryospheric studies, mercury impact and mitigation studies, infection control and ventilation, and microbial community ecology and physiology.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by David E. Graham include:

  • Quantifying pH buffering capacity in acidic, organic-rich Arctic soils: Measurable proxies and implications for soil carbon degradation, 2022, Geoderma
  • Epigenetic Footprints of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Plants, 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Simulated Hydrological Dynamics and Coupled Iron Redox Cycling Impact Methane Production in an Arctic Soil, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Inhibition of Methylmercury and Methane Formation by Nitrous Oxide in Arctic Tundra Soil Microcosms, 2023, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Influences of Hillslope Biogeochemistry on Anaerobic Soil Organic Matter Decomposition in a Tundra Watershed, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences

The scientist frequently publishes in journals such as the Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Geoderma, Frontiers in Plant Science, and Environmental Science & Technology.

Collaborations are a significant part of their work, with frequent co-authors including Baohua Gu, Stan D. Wullschleger, Michael Philben, Neslihan Taş, and Erin Berns.

Best Publications

  • The complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic, sulphate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus

    Hans-Peter Klenk;Rebecca A. Clayton;Jean-Francois Tomb;Owen White

  • The complete genome of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus

    Gerard Deckert;Patrick V. Warren;Terry Gaasterland;William G. Young

  • The Genome of M. Acetivorans Reveals Extensive Metabolic and Physiological Diversity

    James E. Galagan;Chad Nusbaum;Alice Roy;Matthew G. Endrizzi;Matthew G. Endrizzi;Matthew G. Endrizzi

  • The genome of Nanoarchaeum equitans: Insights into early archaeal evolution and derived parasitism

    Elizabeth Waters;Michael J. Hohn;Ivan Ahel;David E. Graham

  • Potential carbon emissions dominated by carbon dioxide from thawed permafrost soils

    Christina Schädel;Martin K.-F. Bader;Edward A.G. Schuur;Christina Biasi

  • A korarchaeal genome reveals insights into the evolution of the Archaea.

    James G. Elkins;Mircea Podar;David E. Graham;Kira S. Makarova

  • Soil Aggregate Microbial Communities: Towards Understanding Microbiome Interactions at Biologically Relevant Scales

    Regina L. Wilpiszeski;Jayde A. Aufrecht;Scott T. Retterer;Matthew B. Sullivan

  • Complete Genome Sequence of the Genetically Tractable Hydrogenotrophic Methanogen Methanococcus maripaludis

    E. L. Hendrickson;R. Kaul;Y. Zhou;D. Bovee

  • Erratum: The complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic, sulphate-reducing archaeon archaeoglobus fulgidus (Nature (1997) 390 (364- 370))

    H. P. Klenk;R. A. Clayton;J. F. Tomb;O. White

  • Microbes in thawing permafrost: the unknown variable in the climate change equation

    David E Graham;Matthew D Wallenstein;Tatiana A Vishnivetskaya;Tatiana A Vishnivetskaya;Mark P Waldrop

  • An archaeal genomic signature

    David E. Graham;Ross Overbeek;Gary J. Olsen;Carl R. Woese

  • Reviews and syntheses: Four decades of modeling methane cycling in terrestrial ecosystems

    Xiaofeng Xu;Xiaofeng Xu;Xiaofeng Xu;Fengming Yuan;Paul J. Hanson;Stan D. Wullschleger

  • Post-Transcriptional Modification in Archaeal tRNAs: Identities and Phylogenetic Relations of Nucleotides from Mesophilic and Hyperthermophilic Methanococcales

    James A. McCloskey;David E. Graham;David E. Graham;Shaolian Zhou;Pamela F. Crain

  • Elucidation of methanogenic coenzyme biosyntheses: from spectroscopy to genomics

    David E. Graham;Robert H. White

  • Enzymology and Evolution of the Pyruvate Pathway to 2-Oxobutyrate in Methanocaldococcus jannaschii

    Randy M. Drevland;Abdul Waheed;David E. Graham

  • Combined inactivation of the Clostridium cellulolyticum lactate and malate dehydrogenase genes substantially increases ethanol yield from cellulose and switchgrass fermentations

    Yongchao Li;Timothy J Tschaplinski;Nancy L Engle;Choo Yieng Hamilton

  • Influence of iron redox cycling on organo-mineral associations in Arctic tundra soil

    Elizabeth Herndon;Elizabeth Herndon;Amineh AlBashaireh;Amineh AlBashaireh;David Singer;Taniya Roy Chowdhury

  • Transfer RNA-dependent amino acid biosynthesis: An essential route to asparagine formation

    Bokkee Min;Joanne T. Pelaschier;David E. Graham;Debra Tumbula-Hansen

  • Identification of Coenzyme M Biosynthetic Phosphosulfolactate Synthase A NEW FAMILY OF SULFONATE-BIOSYNTHESIZING ENZYMES

    David E. Graham;Huimin Xu;Robert H. White

  • Insights into archaeal evolution and symbiosis from the genomes of a nanoarchaeon and its inferred crenarchaeal host from Obsidian Pool, Yellowstone National Park

    Mircea Podar;Mircea Podar;Kira S Makarova;David E Graham;David E Graham;Yuri I Wolf

Frequent Co-Authors

Stan D. Wullschleger
Stan D. Wullschleger Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Baohua Gu
Baohua Gu Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Liyuan Liang
Liyuan Liang Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Robert H. White
Robert H. White Virginia Tech
Salomon Z. Langer
Salomon Z. Langer National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Tommy J. Phelps
Tommy J. Phelps Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Dieter Söll
Dieter Söll Yale University
Susan M. Pfiffner
Susan M. Pfiffner University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Ilia N. Ivanov
Ilia N. Ivanov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Gary J. Olsen
Gary J. Olsen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse career opportunities, especially when combined with online education. Many students interested in the health sciences start with an online asn program, which prepares graduates for nursing careers in less time and with greater flexibility.

For those interested in nutrition and wellness, an online bachelor's in nutrition can lead to roles in dietetics, community health, and food science.

Biology or biochemistry graduates aiming for leadership positions in healthcare may consider cahme-accredited online mha programs. These accredited programs are valuable for advancing into hospital administration, public health, or policy-making roles.

For nurses seeking to earn a doctorate, some choose dnp online no clinicals programs. These options allow registered nurses to advance their education without extensive on-site clinicals, appealing to working professionals.

Exploring these degree pathways provides students with the flexibility to build a rewarding career in health and life sciences, entirely online.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Graham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles