What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary scientific interests are in Biochemistry, Hydrogenosome, Mitosome, Phylogenetics and Malate dehydrogenase.
His work on Differential centrifugation as part of his general Biochemistry study is frequently connected to Tritrichomonas, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
His Hydrogenosome research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Hydrogenase, Pyruvate decarboxylation and Ferredoxin, Pyruvate synthase.
His Mitosome study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Cysteine desulfurase and Eukaryote.
His Archezoa study, which is part of a larger body of work in Eukaryote, is frequently linked to Symbiogenesis, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Malate dehydrogenase research incorporates themes from Glyoxylate cycle, Isocitrate lyase, Malate synthase, Isocitrate dehydrogenase and Aconitase.
His most cited work include:
- The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote (983 citations)
- Biochemistry and Evolution of Anaerobic Energy Metabolism in Eukaryotes (463 citations)
- Mitochondrial remnant organelles of Giardia function in iron-sulphur protein maturation (443 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Biochemistry, Hydrogenosome, Gene, Trichomonas vaginalis and Genetics.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Entamoeba histolytica and Molecular biology in addition to Biochemistry.
His study in Hydrogenosome is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Hydrogenase, Ferredoxin and Eukaryote.
His Mitochondrion study which covers Protozoa that intersects with Cell biology.
His studies in Malate dehydrogenase integrate themes in fields like Isocitrate dehydrogenase and Sequence alignment.
His Giardia lamblia research incorporates elements of Diplomonad, Acetyl—CoA synthetase and Conserved sequence.
He most often published in these fields:
- Biochemistry (63.16%)
- Hydrogenosome (23.68%)
- Gene (21.93%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1996-2019)?
- Biochemistry (63.16%)
- Gene (21.93%)
- Genetics (17.54%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Miklós Müller focuses on Biochemistry, Gene, Genetics, Hydrogenosome and Giardia lamblia.
His Biochemistry study incorporates themes from Entamoeba histolytica and Molecular biology.
His work in the fields of Phylogenetic tree, Phylogenetics and Trichomonas vaginalis overlaps with other areas such as Parabasalid.
His research in Hydrogenosome is mostly focused on Mitosome.
His research in Mitosome intersects with topics in Cysteine desulfurase and Archezoa.
His Giardia lamblia research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Acetyl—CoA synthetase and Conserved sequence.
Between 1996 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote (983 citations)
- Biochemistry and Evolution of Anaerobic Energy Metabolism in Eukaryotes (463 citations)
- Mitochondrial remnant organelles of Giardia function in iron-sulphur protein maturation (443 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Miklós Müller mainly investigates Biochemistry, Hydrogenosome, Mitosome, Genetics and Gene.
His research in Eukaryote and Peptide sequence are components of Biochemistry.
His work on Archezoa as part of general Eukaryote study is frequently linked to Symbiogenesis, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
The Hydrogenosome study combines topics in areas such as Cysteine desulfurase, Genome and Bacteria.
His study in the field of Phylogenetics, Phylogenetic tree and Diplomonad is also linked to topics like Parabasalid.
The various areas that Miklós Müller examines in his Phylogenetics study include Microbiology, Giardia lamblia and Microsporidia.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
