World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
18871
World Ranking
11151
National Ranking
4827

Chemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
18495
World Ranking
9542
National Ranking
2680

David C. Teller publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Teller sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 134 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

David C. Teller D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Teller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C. Teller was affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States during their academic career.

The scientist's scholarly record does not list recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work available for description in the data provided.

There are no recorded awards or honors attributed to David C. Teller in the available source data.

Given the absence of detailed publication and research information, a comprehensive overview of research contributions or thematic focus cannot be outlined beyond institutional affiliation and the status of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G Protein-Coupled Receptor

    Krzysztof Palczewski;T. Kumasaka;T. Hori;C. A. Behnke

  • Advances in determination of a high-resolution three-dimensional structure of rhodopsin, a model of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

    David C. Teller;Tetsuji Okada;Craig A. Behnke;Krzysztof Palczewski

  • “Homology” in proteins and nucleic acids: A terminology muddle and a way out of it

    Gerald R. Reeck;Christoph de Haën;David C. Teller;Russell F. Doolittle

  • Three-dimensional structure of a transglutaminase: human blood coagulation factor XIII.

    Vivien C. Yee;Lars C. Pedersen;Isolde Le Trong;Paul D. Bishop

  • The 2.3 angstrom X-ray structure of nitrite reductase from Achromobacter cycloclastes

    J. W. Godden;Stewart Turley;David C. Teller;Elinor T. Adman

  • Characterization of a class of cationic proteins that specifically interact with intermediate filaments.

    Peter M. Steinert;John S. Cantieri;David C. Teller;John D. Lonsdale-Eccles

  • G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin: a prospectus.

    Sławomir Filipek;Ronald E. Stenkamp;David C. Teller;Krzysztof Palczewski

  • Homology of amino acid sequences of rat liver cathepsins B and H with that of papain

    Koji Takio;Takae Towatari;Nobuhiko Katunuma;David C. Teller

  • Crystal structure of a 30 kDa C-terminal fragment from the γ chain of human fibrinogen

    Vivien C. Yee;Kathleen P. Pratt;Hélène C F Côté;Isolde Le Trong

  • Ultracentrifuge studies with Rayleigh interference optics. II. Low-speed sedimentation equilibrium of homogeneous systems.

    Richards Eg;Teller Dc;Schachman Hk

  • Influence of substrates on the dissociation of rabbit muscle D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

    Vincent D. Hoagland;David C. Teller

  • Characterization of human, bovine, and horse antithrombin III.

    Kotoku Kurachi;Gottfried Schmer;Mark A. Hermodson;David C. Teller

  • A reinvestigation of the molecular weight of glycogen phosphorylase.

    Virginia L. Seery;Edmond H. Fischer;David C. Teller

  • The phylogeny of trypsin-related serine proteases and their zymogens. New methods for the investigation of distant evolutionary relationships☆

    Christoph de Haën;Hans Neurath;David C. Teller

  • Prediction of peptide retention times in reversed-phases high-performance liquid chromatography during linear gradient elution

    Tatsuru Sasagawa;Tsuneo Okuyama;David C. Teller

  • The molecular characteristics of yeast aldolase.

    Curtis E. Harris;Rodger D. Kobes;David C. Teller;William J. Rutter

  • ULTRACENTRIFUGE STUDIES WITH RAYLEIGH INTERFERENCE OPTICS. III. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS APPLIED TO HIGH-SPEED SEDIMENTATION EQUILIBRIUM EXPERIMENTS*

    D. C. Teller;T. A. Horbett;E. G. Richards;H. K. Schachman

  • Transglutaminase factor XIII uses proteinase-like catalytic triad to crosslink macromolecules.

    L. C. Pedersen;Vivien Yee;P. D. Bishop;I. Le Trong

  • Properties of an interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein from bovine retina.

    J. C. Saari;D. C. Teller;John W Crabb;L. Bredberg

  • Accessible area, packing volumes and interaction surfaces of globular proteins.

    David C. Teller

  • Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G-protein-coupled receptor.

    R. E. Stenkamp;D. C. Teller;K. Palczewski

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald E. Stenkamp
Ronald E. Stenkamp University of Washington
Krzysztof Palczewski
Krzysztof Palczewski University of California, Irvine
Mart Mannik
Mart Mannik University of Washington
Lars C. Pedersen
Lars C. Pedersen National Institutes of Health
Slawomir Filipek
Slawomir Filipek University of Warsaw
John W. Crabb
John W. Crabb Cleveland Clinic
Edmond H. Fischer
Edmond H. Fischer University of Washington
Howard K. Schachman
Howard K. Schachman University of California, Berkeley
Earl W. Davie
Earl W. Davie University of Washington
Aarno Palotie
Aarno Palotie University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths, including forensic science, criminal justice, and legal support roles. Many students choose to complement their chemistry background with specialized online programs to enhance their job prospects.

For those interested in combining scientific expertise with law enforcement, exploring high paying jobs in forensics can be rewarding. These careers often require a strong foundation in chemistry and additional forensic training, which online degrees can provide flexibly and affordably.

Understanding the cost of criminal justice degree is crucial for students balancing budgets and career goals. Many institutions offer affordable options to pursue these degrees online without sacrificing quality.

Starting with an online associates in criminal justice is a practical step for learners seeking entry-level positions or a pathway to advanced studies, providing foundational knowledge in the field with flexible learning schedules.

Additionally, those interested in legal system support roles can consider degrees that impact paralegal salary associate's degree prospects. An associate’s degree in paralegal studies complements analytical skills gained from chemistry and opens doors to well-paying employment opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Teller

Recently Published Articles