World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
8782
World Ranking
16778
National Ranking
1323

Chris Denning publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Denning sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 174 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Chris Denning D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Denning sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chris Denning is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broad fields, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as molecular biology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, clinical psychology, biomedical engineering, and infectious diseases.

Denning's research topics cover a diverse range of subjects. Major themes include COVID-19 and mental health, pluripotent stem cells research, neuroscience and neural engineering, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 3D printing in biomedical research, SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing, as well as cardiomyopathy and myosin studies.

Recent significant publications by Denning and collaborators include:

  • Complex Relationship Between Cardiac Fibroblasts and Cardiomyocytes in Health and Disease (2021, Journal of the American Heart Association)
  • Students' Views towards Sars-Cov-2 Mass Asymptomatic Testing, Social Distancing and Self-Isolation in a University Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study (2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Self-Isolation on Students and Staff in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study (2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Comparison of 10 Control hPSC Lines for Drug Screening in an Engineered Heart Tissue Format (2020, Stem Cell Reports)
  • Blinded, Multicenter Evaluation of Drug-induced Changes in Contractility Using Human-induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Cardiomyocytes (2020, Toxicological Sciences)

Denning frequently publishes in several academic venues, among which the following stand out for their volume of publications:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Stem Cell Reports
  • F1000Research
  • Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology

The scientist also collaborates regularly with a group of frequent co-authors, including Holly Blake, Jessica Corner, Jonathan K. Ball, Katja Gehmlich, and Nguyen T.N. Vo. Their collaborations reflect a network spanning expertise in related biomedical and clinical research areas.

Best Publications

  • Screening ethnically diverse human embryonic stem cells identifies a chromosome 20 minimal amplicon conferring growth advantage

    Katherine Amps;Peter W. Andrews;George Anyfantis;Lyle Armstrong

  • Small molecule absorption by PDMS in the context of drug response bioassays

    B.J. van Meer;H. de Vries;K.S.A. Firth;J. van Weerd

  • Drug evaluation in cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells carrying a long QT syndrome type 2 mutation

    Elena Matsa;Divya Rajamohan;Emily Dick;Lorraine Young

  • Deletion of the alpha(1,3)galactosyl transferase (GGTA1) gene and the prion protein (PrP) gene in sheep.

    C Denning;S Burl;A Ainslie;J Bracken

  • Improved Human Embryonic Stem Cell Embryoid Body Homogeneity and Cardiomyocyte Differentiation from a Novel V-96 Plate Aggregation System Highlights Interline Variability

    Paul W. Burridge;David Anderson;Helen Priddle;Maria D. Barbadillo Muñoz

  • Cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells: from laboratory curiosity to industrial biomedical platform

    Chris Denning;Viola Borgdorff;James Crutchley;Karl S.A. Firth

  • MUSCLEMOTION: A Versatile Open Software Tool to Quantify Cardiomyocyte and Cardiac Muscle Contraction In Vitro and In Vivo.

    Luca Sala;Berend J. Van Meer;Leon G.J. Tertoolen;Jeroen Bakkers

  • Transgenic Enrichment of Cardiomyocytes From Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    David Anderson;Tim Self;Ian R Mellor;Gareth Goh

  • CRISPR/Cas9 editing in human pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocytes highlights arrhythmias, hypocontractility, and energy depletion as potential therapeutic targets for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Diogo Mosqueira;Ingra Mannhardt;Jamie R Bhagwan;Katarzyna Lis-Slimak

  • Restriction landmark genome scanning identifies culture-induced DNA methylation instability in the human embryonic stem cell epigenome

    Cinzia Allegrucci;Yue Zhong Wu;Alexandra Thurston;Chris N. Denning

  • Automated, scalable culture of human embryonic stem cells in feeder‐free conditions

    Robert James Thomas;David Anderson;Amit Chandra;Nigel M. Smith

  • Materials for stem cell factories of the future

    Adam Celiz;James G W Smith;Robert Samuel M Langer;Daniel G Anderson

  • N6-methyladenosine regulates the stability of RNA:DNA hybrids in human cells.

    Abdulkadir Abakir;Tom C. Giles;Agnese Cristini;Jeremy M. Foster

  • Allele-specific RNA interference rescues the long-QT syndrome phenotype in human-induced pluripotency stem cell cardiomyocytes.

    Elena Matsa;James E. Dixon;Christopher Medway;Orestis Georgiou

  • Complex Relationship Between Cardiac Fibroblasts and Cardiomyocytes in Health and Disease.

    Caitlin Hall;Katja Gehmlich;Katja Gehmlich;Chris Denning;Davor Pavlovic

  • Improved genetic manipulation of human embryonic stem cells

    Stefan R Braam;Chris Denning;Stieneke van den Brink;Peter Kats

  • Evaluating the utility of cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells for drug screening

    Emily Dick;Divya Rajamohan;Jonathon Ronksley;Chris Denning

  • Bystander Effects of Different Enzyme-Prodrug Systems for Cancer Gene Therapy Depend on Different Pathways for Intercellular Transfer of Toxic Metabolites, a Factor That Will Govern Clinical Choice of Appropriate Regimes

    C. Denning;J. D. Pitts

  • Modeling and study of the mechanism of dilated cardiomyopathy using induced pluripotent stem cells derived from individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

    Bo Lin;Yang Li;Lu Han;Aaron D. Kaplan

  • Current status of drug screening and disease modelling in human pluripotent stem cells

    Divya Rajamohan;Elena Matsa;Spandan Kalra;James Crutchley

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine L. Mummery
Christine L. Mummery Leiden University Medical Center
Morgan R. Alexander
Morgan R. Alexander University of Nottingham
Thomas Eschenhagen
Thomas Eschenhagen Universität Hamburg
Martyn C. Davies
Martyn C. Davies University of Nottingham
Robert Passier
Robert Passier University of Twente
Leon G.J. Tertoolen
Leon G.J. Tertoolen Leiden University Medical Center
Godfrey L. Smith
Godfrey L. Smith University of Glasgow
David A. Barrett
David A. Barrett University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Biology and Biochemistry, a wide range of online degrees and career pathways exist—especially in healthcare and health information fields. With a solid science background, you can explore dynamic roles where biology expertise meets technology and data management.

Health information management is an in-demand sector, offering opportunities to work with healthcare data and patient records. If you're interested in pursuing this path, it’s worth exploring the most affordable online health information management degree programs to get started.

Another lucrative option is medical coding. To learn more about earning potential in this field, see the latest information on medical coder salary expectations. Becoming a certified professional coder requires specialized training and certification, each with its own requirements and career benefits.

If you're wondering about job satisfaction and long-term prospects, discover the pros and cons of being a medical biller and coder. These allied health roles offer flexibility, competitive salaries, and meaningful ways to leverage your science education outside of the traditional lab or clinic.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Denning

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles