World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
18133
World Ranking
6989
National Ranking
3217

Ching Kung publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ching Kung sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 199 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ching Kung D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ching Kung sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Ching Kung is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and medicine, with notable focus on developmental and educational psychology, otorhinolaryngology, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and sensory systems.

The main topics of Ching Kung's work include hearing impairment and communication, ear surgery and otitis media, hearing loss and rehabilitation, vestibular and auditory disorders, hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, and indigenous health, education, and rights.

Recent publications by Ching Kung cover a range of issues related to ear health, hearing loss, and related interventions. These include:

  • 'Sometimes they're gammin, playing tricks, but sometimes it's ears.' The perspectives of urban parents and carers of young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children on their journey to diagnosis of persistent ear health and hearing problems, 2021, Public Health Research & Practice
  • Routine ear health and hearing checks for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged under 6 years attending primary care: a national consensus statement, 2023, The Medical Journal of Australia
  • The Use of Telepractice to Administer Norm-Referenced Communication and Cognition Assessments in Children With Hearing Loss: A Rapid Review, 2023, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • Editorial: Early detection and intervention for unilateral hearing loss and mild bilateral hearing loss in children: clinical practices and outcomes, 2024, Frontiers in Pediatrics
  • Development of the national consensus statement on ear health and hearing check recommendations for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged under 6 years attending primary care: systematic scoping review and e-Delphi, 2024, BMC Primary Care

Ching Kung frequently collaborates with several other researchers, including Vivienne Marnane, Meagan Ward, Samantha Harkus, Isabel O'Keeffe, and Kelvin Kong.

Their work is published in respected journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Public Health Research & Practice, Frontiers in Pediatrics, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, and BMC Primary Care.

Ching Kung is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, an honor awarded in 2011.

Best Publications

  • A possible unifying principle for mechanosensation

    Ching Kung

  • A large-conductance mechanosensitive channel in E. coli encoded by mscL alone

    Sergei I. Sukharev;Paul Blount;Boris Martinac;Boris Martinac;Frederick R. Blattner

  • Pressure-sensitive ion channel in Escherichia coli.

    Boris Martinac;Matthew Buechner;Anne H. Delcour;Julius Adler

  • Mechanosensitive ion channels of E. coli activated by amphipaths.

    Boris Martinac;Julius Adler;Ching Kung

  • Energetic and spatial parameters for gating of the bacterial large conductance mechanosensitive channel, MscL

    Sergei I. Sukharev;Wade J. Sigurdson;Ching Kung;Frederick Sachs

  • Calmodulin as an Ion Channel Subunit

    Yoshiro Saimi;Ching Kung

  • A mechanosensitive ion channel in the yeast plasma membrane.

    Michael C. Gustin;Xin-Liang Zhou;Boris Martinac;Ching Kung

  • Mechanosensitive channels of Escherichia coli: the MscL gene, protein, and activities.

    Sergei I. Sukharev;Paul Blount;Boris Martinac;Ching Kung

  • Two types of mechanosensitive channels in the Escherichia coli cell envelope: solubilization and functional reconstitution.

    S. I. Sukharev;B. Martinac;V. Y. Arshavsky;Ching Kung

  • Mechanosensitive Channels in Microbes

    Ching Kung;Boris Martinac;Sergei Sukharev

  • A TRP homolog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae forms an intracellular Ca2+-permeable channel in the yeast vacuolar membrane

    Chris P. Palmer;Xin-Liang Zhou;Junyu Lin;Stephen H. Loukin

  • Design of allele-specific inhibitors to probe protein kinase signaling

    Anthony C. Bishop;Kavita Shah;Yi Liu;Laurie Witucki

  • Feeling the hidden mechanical forces in lipid bilayer is an original sense

    Andriy Anishkin;Stephen H. Loukin;Jinfeng Teng;Ching Kung

  • One face of a transmembrane helix is crucial in mechanosensitive channel gating

    Xiaorong Ou;Paul Blount;Robert J. Hoffman;Ching Kung

  • Hydrophilicity of a single residue within MscL correlates with increased channel mechanosensitivity.

    Kenjiro Yoshimura;Ann Batiza;Matt Schroeder;Paul Blount

  • Modified reconstitution method used in patch-clamp studies of Escherichia coli ion channels

    A. H. Delcour;B. Martinac;J. Adler;Ching Kung

  • A mechanosensitive channel in whole cells and in membrane patches of the fungus Uromyces

    Xin-Liang Zhou;Mary Ann Stumpf;Harvey C. Hoch;Ching Kung

  • Biochemical studies of the excitable membrane of Paramecium tetraurelia. III. Proteins of cilia and ciliary membranes.

    A Adoutte;R Ramanathan;R M Lewis;R R Dute

  • Single residue substitutions that change the gating properties of a mechanosensitive channel in Escherichia coli

    Paul Blount;Sergei I. Sukharev;Matthew J. Schroeder;Scott K. Nagle;Scott K. Nagle

  • Ion Channels in Microbes

    Boris Martinac;Yoshiro Saimi;Ching Kung

Frequent Co-Authors

Boris Martinac
Boris Martinac Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute
Julius Adler
Julius Adler University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael R. Culbertson
Michael R. Culbertson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Janine Beisson
Janine Beisson University of Paris-Saclay
Laurent Duret
Laurent Duret Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Donata Oertel
Donata Oertel University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael Forte
Michael Forte Oregon Health & Science University
Helmut Plattner
Helmut Plattner University of Konstanz
David W. Haas
David W. Haas Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Frederick R. Blattner
Frederick R. Blattner University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Biology or Biochemistry opens diverse opportunities in the healthcare and life sciences sectors. Many students and professionals look for flexible ways to advance their careers through online degrees and specialized programs.

For those with a strong science foundation, online options like the online dietitian degree can lead to rewarding roles in nutrition and dietetics. Registered nurses considering career growth can benefit from the rn to bsn online programs, which help bridge into advanced nursing positions with flexible learning formats.

Graduate-level professionals in the healthcare field might consider specialized tracks such as the fastest post master's pmhnp programs focused on psychiatric-mental health, or the versatile post masters fnp programs for those aiming to become family nurse practitioners.

Whether you’re planning to enhance your clinical knowledge, switch specialties, or qualify for new licensure, exploring these related online pathways can help you stay competitive in the ever-evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Ching Kung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles