World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carmine Maria Pappalardo

Carmine Maria Pappalardo

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 30 3445 3239 135 133 104 1953

Carmine Maria Pappalardo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carmine Maria Pappalardo between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carmine Maria Pappalardo published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2025. 22 of the 109 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2025. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 12 publications
2007 2025

109 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carmine Maria Pappalardo: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 0
2009 5
2010 2
2011 0
2012 7
2013 8
2014 4
2015 3
2016 2
2017 9
2018 10
2019 11
2020 9
2021 5
2022 2
2023 9
2024 10
2025 12
Total 109
Download as CSV

Carmine Maria Pappalardo publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carmine Maria Pappalardo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 104 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91 104
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Carmine Maria Pappalardo D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carmine Maria Pappalardo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83 30
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • A natural absolute coordinate formulation for the kinematic and dynamic analysis of rigid multibody systems

    Unknown

  • Contact force control in multibody pantograph/catenary systems:

    Carmine Maria Pappalardo;Mohil D. Patel;Brian Tinsley;Ahmed A. Shabana

  • Pantograph/Catenary Contact Formulations

    Shubhankar Kulkarni;Carmine M. Pappalardo;Ahmed A. Shabana

  • A Comprehensive Literature Review on Hydrogen Tanks: Storage, Safety, and Structural Integrity

    Unknown

  • A New Ancf/CRBF Fully Parameterized Plate Finite Element

    Carmine Maria Pappalardo;Michael Wallin;Ahmed A. Shabana

  • Rational ANCF Thin Plate Finite Element

    Carmine M. Pappalardo;Zuqing Yu;Xiaoshun Zhang;Ahmed A. Shabana

  • On the formulation of the planar ANCF triangular finite elements

    Carmine M. Pappalardo;Tengfei Wang;Ahmed A. Shabana

  • A Parametric Study of a Deep Reinforcement Learning Control System Applied to the Swing-Up Problem of the Cart-Pole

    Unknown

  • System Identification Algorithm for Computing the Modal Parameters of Linear Mechanical Systems

    Unknown

  • On the use of component mode synthesis methods for the model reduction of flexible multibody systems within the floating frame of reference formulation

    Unknown

  • Multibody modeling and nonlinear control of the pantograph/catenary system

    Unknown

  • On the dynamics and control of underactuated nonholonomic mechanical systems and applications to mobile robots

    Unknown

  • Adjoint-based Optimization Procedure for Active Vibration Control of Nonlinear Mechanical Systems

    Unknown

  • Dynamic analysis of planar rigid multibody systems modeled using natural absolute coordinates

    Carmine Mariar Pappalardo;Domenico Guida

  • On the Lagrange multipliers of the intrinsic constraint equations of rigid multibody mechanical systems

    Carmine M. Pappalardo;Domenico Guida

  • A Multibody System Approach for the Systematic Development of a Closed-Chain Kinematic Model for Two-Wheeled Vehicles

    Camilo Andres Manrique-Escobar;Carmine Maria Pappalardo;Domenico Guida

  • Forward and Inverse Dynamics of a Unicycle-Like Mobile Robot

    Carmine Maria Pappalardo;Domenico Guida

  • Control of nonlinear vibrations using the adjoint method

    Carmine Maria Pappalardo;Domenico Guida

  • Forward and inverse dynamics of nonholonomic mechanical systems

    Domenico Guida;Carmine M. Pappalardo

  • Use of independent volume parameters in the development of new large displacement ANCF triangular plate/shell elements

    Carmine M. Pappalardo;Zhigang Zhang;Ahmed A. Shabana

Frequent Co-Authors

Domenico Guida
Domenico Guida University of Salerno
Ahmed A. Shabana
Ahmed A. Shabana University of Illinois at Chicago

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, understanding related online degrees and career pathways can broaden future opportunities. Areas such as counseling and behavioral sciences offer alternative routes for those interested in the human factors or safety aspects of engineering systems.

If you’re curious about mental health support roles, reviewing the types of therapist degrees can help clarify your options. Some programs focus on clinical counseling, while others emphasize education or rehabilitation, which could complement engineering disciplines like human factors or ergonomics.

For those seeking more accessible entry points, the easiest counseling degrees highlight programs designed to accommodate busy schedules or career changers. These options may offer flexible learning environments ideal for working professionals in engineering fields looking to pivot or expand their expertise.

Accelerated programs like the accelerated BCBA program online are great examples of efficient pathways gaining popularity. They allow students to fast-track certification in behavior analysis, which can enhance skills in team management and organizational development within technical industries.

Lastly, understanding prerequisites and acceptance rates for specialized fields can be critical. Resources such as speech language pathology graduate programs offer insight into competitive admissions processes, helping students prepare for rigorous graduate studies that focus on communication disorders, a niche area that intersects with aerospace ergonomics and pilot communication safety.

Best Scientists Citing Carmine Maria Pappalardo

Recently Published Articles