World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
59
Citations
15942
World Ranking
2307
National Ranking
723

Bruno C. Hancock publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno C. Hancock sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 147 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Bruno C. Hancock D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno C. Hancock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno C. Hancock is affiliated with Pfizer in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in engineering, with a focus on pharmaceutical sciences and related subfields such as molecular biology, biomedical engineering, materials chemistry, pharmaceutical science, and spectroscopy.

The scientist's research prominently covers topics including drug solubility and delivery systems, crystallization and solubility studies, protein purification and stability, analytical chemistry and chromatography, computational drug discovery methods, crystallography and molecular interactions, and extraction and separation processes.

Bruno C. Hancock has published several papers in notable scientific journals. Selected recent papers include:

  • Prediction of the Relative Free Energies of Drug Polymorphs above Zero Kelvin (2020, Crystal Growth & Design)
  • The Role of Titanium Dioxide (E171) and the Requirements for Replacement Materials in Oral Solid Dosage Forms: An IQ Consortium Working Group Review (2022, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences)
  • A Comparison of Methods for Computing Relative Anhydrous-Hydrate Stability with Molecular Simulation (2022, Crystal Growth & Design)
  • Titanium Dioxide (E171 Grade) and the Search For Replacement Opacifiers and Colorants: Supplier Readiness Survey, Case Studies and Regulatory Perspective (2023, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences)
  • Patient Acceptability and Preferences for Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Product Attributes: A Scoping Review (2024, Patient Preference and Adherence)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with several coauthors appearing multiple times in their work. Notable collaborators include Geoffrey P. F. Wood, Eric Dybeck, Guangxu Sun, Michael A. Bellucci, and Shuhao Wen.

Bruno's research has been published mainly in these venues:

  • Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Crystal Growth & Design
  • Patient Preference and Adherence
  • Molecular Pharmaceutics
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Best Publications

  • Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems

    Bruno C. Hancock;George Zografi

  • What is the true solubility advantage for amorphous pharmaceuticals

    Bruno C. Hancock;Michael Parks

  • The relationship between the glass transition temperature and the water content of amorphous pharmaceutical solids.

    Bruno C. Hancock;George Zografi

  • Crystallization of Indomethacin from the Amorphous State below and above Its Glass Transition Temperature

    Minoru Yoshioka;Bruno C. Hancock;George Zografi

  • CHARACTERIZATION OF THE TIME SCALES OF MOLECULAR MOTION IN PHARMACEUTICALLY IMPORTANT GLASSES

    Sheri L. Shamblin;Xiaolin Tang;Liuquan Chang;Bruno C. Hancock

  • The use of solubility parameters in pharmaceutical dosage form design

    Bruno C. Hancock;Peter York;Raymond C. Rowe

  • Modelling the mechanical behaviour of pharmaceutical powders during compaction

    C.-Y. Wu;O.M. Ruddy;A.C. Bentham;B.C. Hancock

  • A modified Drucker-Prager Cap model for die compaction simulation of pharmaceutical powders

    L.H. Han;J.A. Elliott;A.C. Bentham;A. Mills

  • Differential scanning calorimetry: applications in drug development.

    Sophie-Dorothée Clas;Chad R. Dalton;Bruno C. Hancock

  • Process Modeling in the Pharmaceutical Industry using the Discrete Element Method

    William R. Ketterhagen;Mary T. am Ende;Bruno C. Hancock

  • Predicting discharge dynamics from a rectangular hopper using the discrete element method (DEM)

    Anshu Anand;Jennifer S. Curtis;Carl R. Wassgren;Bruno C. Hancock

  • Predicting the flow mode from hoppers using the discrete element method

    William R. Ketterhagen;Jennifer S. Curtis;Carl R. Wassgren;Bruno C. Hancock

  • Numerical and experimental investigation of capping mechanisms during pharmaceutical tablet compaction

    C.-Y. Wu;B.C. Hancock;A. Mills;A.C. Bentham

  • Molecular mobility of amorphous pharmaceuticals determined using differential scanning calorimetry

    Bruno C Hancock;Sheri L Shamblin

  • Granular segregation in discharging cylindrical hoppers: A discrete element and experimental study

    William R. Ketterhagen;Jennifer S. Curtis;Carl R. Wassgren;Angela Kong

  • Modeling granular segregation in flow from quasi-three-dimensional, wedge-shaped hoppers

    William R. Ketterhagen;Jennifer S. Curtis;Carl R. Wassgren;Bruno C. Hancock

  • The relative densities of pharmaceutical powders, blends, dry granulations, and immediate-release tablets

    Bruno C. Hancock;Joshua T. Colvin;Matthew P. Mullarney;Andrey V. Zinchuk

  • Interpretation of Relaxation Time Constants for Amorphous Pharmaceutical Systems

    Sheri L. Shamblin;Bruno C. Hancock;Yves Dupuis;Michael J. Pikal

  • The use of solution theories for predicting water vapor absorption by amorphous pharmaceutical solids: a test of the Flory-Huggins and Vrentas models.

    Bruno C. Hancock;George Zografi

  • A numerical study of granular shear flows of rod-like particles using the discrete element method

    Y. Guo;C. Wassgren;W. Ketterhagen;B. Hancock

  • A simple predictive model for the tensile strength of binary tablets

    Chuan-Yu Wu;Serena M. Best;A. Craig Bentham;Bruno C. Hancock

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl Wassgren
Carl Wassgren Purdue University West Lafayette
James A. Elliott
James A. Elliott University of Cambridge
George Zografi
George Zografi University of Wisconsin–Madison
Chuan-Yu Wu
Chuan-Yu Wu University of Surrey
Serena M. Best
Serena M. Best University of Cambridge
Peter York
Peter York University of Bradford
Michael J. Pikal
Michael J. Pikal University of Connecticut
Ruth E. Cameron
Ruth E. Cameron University of Cambridge
William Bonfield
William Bonfield University of Cambridge
Makoto Mark Taketo
Makoto Mark Taketo Kyoto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Bruno C. Hancock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles