World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
11081
World Ranking
10449
National Ranking
361

Borries Demeler publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Borries Demeler sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 244 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Borries Demeler D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Borries Demeler sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Borries Demeler is affiliated with the University of Lethbridge in Canada and conducts research primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Genetics, Materials Chemistry, and Immunology.

Their research covers a diverse range of topics such as:

  • Protein purification and stability
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions

Demeler has contributed to notable publications including:

  • Density Matching Multi-wavelength Analytical Ultracentrifugation to Measure Drug Loading of Lipid Nanoparticle Formulations, 2021, ACS Nano
  • Nucleic acid binding by SAMHD1 contributes to the antiretroviral activity and is enhanced by the GpsN modification, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Mechanism of NanR gene repression and allosteric induction of bacterial sialic acid metabolism, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Moving analytical ultracentrifugation software to a good manufacturing practices (GMP) environment, 2020, PLoS Computational Biology
  • Structure-function studies reveal ComEA contains an oligomerization domain essential for transformation in gram-positive bacteria, 2022, Nature Communications

The most frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Biophysics Journal
  • Nature Communications
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Nucleic Acids Research

Demeler collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Amy Henrickson
  • Trushar R. Patel
  • Tyler Mrozowich
  • Gary E. Gorbet
  • Emre Brookes

Best Publications

  • Structural bases of unphosphorylated STAT1 association and receptor binding.

    Xiang Mao;Zhiyong Ren;Gregory N. Parker;Holger Sondermann

  • Sedimentation velocity analysis of highly heterogeneous systems.

    Borries Demeler;Kensal E. van Holde

  • Structure of the Hsp110:Hsc70 Nucleotide Exchange Machine

    Jonathan P. Schuermann;Jianwen Jiang;Jorge Cuellar;Oscar Llorca

  • Structural basis of HIV-1 capsid recognition by PF74 and CPSF6

    Akash Bhattacharya;Steven L. Alam;Thomas Fricke;Kaneil Zadrozny

  • A two-dimensional spectrum analysis for sedimentation velocity experiments of mixtures with heterogeneity in molecular weight and shape

    Emre H Brookes;Weiming Cao;Borries Demeler

  • Dissociation of human copper-zinc superoxide dismutase dimers using chaotrope and reductant. Insights into the molecular basis for dimer stability.

    Peter A. Doucette;Lisa J. Whitson;Xiaohang Cao;Virgil Schirf

  • Neural network optimization for E. coli promoter prediction.

    Borries Demeler;Guangwen Zhou

  • Direct sedimentation analysis of interference optical data in analytical ultracentrifugation.

    Peter Schuck;Borries Demeler

  • Identification and interpretation of complexity in sedimentation velocity boundaries

    Borries Demeler;Hashim Saber;Jeffrey C. Hansen

  • Ag44(SR)304−: a silver–thiolate superatom complex

    Kellen M. Harkness;Yun Tang;Amala Dass;Jun Pan

  • Analytical ultracentrifugation of complex macromolecular systems.

    Jeffrey C. Hansen;Jacob Lebowitz;Jacob Lebowitz;Borries Demeler

  • Chaperone activity of cytosolic small heat shock proteins from wheat.

    Eman Basha;Garrett J. Lee;Borries Demeler;Elizabeth Vierling

  • The implementation of SOMO (SOlution MOdeller) in the UltraScan analytical ultracentrifugation data analysis suite: Enhanced capabilities allow the reliable hydrodynamic modeling of virtually any kind of biomacromolecule

    Emre H Brookes;Borries Demeler;Camillo Rosano;Mattia Rocco

  • Monte Carlo analysis of sedimentation experiments

    Borries Demeler;Emre Brookes

  • Gene selection, alternative splicing, and post-translational processing regulate neuroligin selectivity for β-neurexins

    Davide Comoletti;Robyn E. Flynn;Antony A. Boucard;Borries Demeler

  • Deamidation destabilizes and triggers aggregation of a lens protein, βA3‐crystallin

    Takumi Takata;Julie T. Oxford;Borries Demeler;Kirsten J. Lampi

  • Cytotoxic Cell Granule-mediated Apoptosis CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MACROMOLECULAR COMPLEX OF GRANZYME B WITH SERGLYCIN

    Srikumar M. Raja;Baikun Wang;Mandakini Dantuluri;Umesh R. Desai

  • Determination of Molecular Parameters by Fitting Sedimentation Data to Finite-Element Solutions of the Lamm Equation

    Borries Demeler;Hashim Saber

  • Parsimonious regularization using genetic algorithms applied to the analysis of analytical ultracentrifugation experiments

    Emre H. Brookes;Borries Demeler

  • Mechanism of Rab Geranylgeranylation: Formation of the Catalytic Ternary Complex†

    Janmeet S. Anant;Luc Desnoyers;Mischa Machius;Borries Demeler

Frequent Co-Authors

P. John Hart
P. John Hart The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Marlon Pierce
Marlon Pierce Indiana University
Helmut Cölfen
Helmut Cölfen University of Konstanz
Jeffrey C. Hansen
Jeffrey C. Hansen Colorado State University
Felipe Diaz-Griffero
Felipe Diaz-Griffero Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Eileen M. Lafer
Eileen M. Lafer The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Baek Kim
Baek Kim Emory University
Robert L. Whetten
Robert L. Whetten Northern Arizona University
Wayne A. Hendrickson
Wayne A. Hendrickson Columbia University
Jill Trewhella
Jill Trewhella University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Biology or Biochemistry, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can open new doors. Choosing an online biology degree program offers flexibility and accelerated options, making it easier for working students or those seeking fast-track education.

For those interested in healthcare roles, there are several specialized programs to consider. Medical assisting, for instance, is both high-demand and accessible online. Students may benefit from financial aid for medical assistant programs, making education more affordable and accessible.

Career advancement is also possible through bridge programs. If you’re a medical assistant looking to grow, the medical assistant to lpn bridge program lets you transition to a Licensed Practical Nurse role with ease.

Additionally, an online asn program helps you earn an associate degree in nursing, a pathway with strong job growth. Each of these flexible online options can lead you toward rewarding careers in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Borries Demeler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles