World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 47 15539 14015 671 603 200 9389

Benoit Louis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benoit Louis between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benoit Louis published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2020. 17 of the 228 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2020. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 10 publications
2001 2025

228 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benoit Louis: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 6
2006 7
2007 5
2008 11
2009 15
2010 10
2011 13
2012 9
2013 11
2014 8
2015 4
2016 7
2017 16
2018 12
2019 14
2020 19
2021 16
2022 13
2023 6
2024 7
2025 10
Total 228
Download as CSV

Benoit Louis publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benoit Louis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 200 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344 200
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Benoit Louis D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benoit Louis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776 47
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Benoit Louis is affiliated with the University of Strasbourg in France, with a research focus spanning materials science, engineering, and chemistry. Their work encompasses several subfields, particularly materials chemistry and inorganic chemistry, alongside mechanical and biomedical engineering within engineering disciplines.

The research topics that Benoit Louis has explored include:

  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis

Benoit Louis has contributed frequently to a range of publication venues, with multiple papers appearing in:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
  • Catalysts
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • CrystEngComm

Recent published works include:

  • Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: state of the art and future challenges, 2020, Chemical Society Reviews
  • CO2 adsorption mechanisms on MOFs: a case study of open metal sites, ultra-microporosity and flexible framework, 2021, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
  • Deep eutectic solvents for the preparation and post-synthetic modification of metal- and covalent organic frameworks, 2021, CrystEngComm
  • Adsorptive removal of gaseous formaldehyde at realistic concentrations, 2020, Journal of environmental chemical engineering
  • HKUST-1 MOF in reline deep eutectic solvent: synthesis and phase transformation, 2021, Dalton Transactions

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Benoit Louis's work, with recurrent coauthors including Renata A. Maia, Stéphane A. Baudron, Michaël Teixeira, Olesia Zaitceva, and Valérie Bénéteau. These collaborations highlight interdisciplinary connections within their research fields.

Best Publications

  • Catalytic CO2 valorization into CH4 on Ni-based ceria-zirconia. Reaction mechanism by operando IR spectroscopy

    P.A. Ussa Aldana;F. Ocampo;K. Kobl;B. Louis

  • Effect of Ce/Zr composition and noble metal promotion on nickel based CexZr1−xO2 catalysts for carbon dioxide methanation

    Fabien Ocampo;Benoit Louis;Lioubov Kiwi-Minsker;Anne-Cécile Roger

  • Methanation of carbon dioxide over nickel-based Ce0.72Zr0.28O2 mixed oxide catalysts prepared by sol–gel method

    Fabien Ocampo;Benoit Louis;Anne-Cécile Roger

  • Engineering Zeolites for Catalytic Cracking to Light Olefins

    Vincent Blay;Benoît Louis;Rubén Miravalles;Toshiyuki Yokoi

  • Methane dehydro-aromatization on Mo/ZSM-5: About the hidden role of Brønsted acid sites

    Jean-Philippe Tessonnier;Benoît Louis;Séverinne Rigolet;Marc Jacques Ledoux

  • Ni-ZSM-5 catalysts: Detailed characterization of metal sites for proper catalyst design

    A.J. Maia;B. Louis;Y.L. Lam;M.M. Pereira

  • Synthesis and catalytic performance of Cu1Mn0.5Ti0.5Ox mixed oxide as low-temperature NH3-SCR catalyst with enhanced SO2 resistance

    Qinghua Yan;Qinghua Yan;Sining Chen;Cheng Zhang;Qiang Wang

  • Conversion of methanol into light olefins over ZSM-5 zeolite: Strategy to enhance propene selectivity

    Francesca Lønstad Bleken;Sachin Chavan;Unni Olsbye;Marilyne Boltz

  • Recent advances in lithium containing ceramic based sorbents for high-temperature CO2 capture

    Yu Zhang;Yanshan Gao;Heriberto Pfeiffer;Benoît Louis

  • Molten salts-modified MgO-based adsorbents for intermediate-temperature CO2 capture: A review

    Wanlin Gao;Tuantuan Zhou;Yanshan Gao;Benoît Louis

  • An Overview on Zeolite Shaping Technology and Solutions to Overcome Diffusion Limitations

    Rogéria Bingre;Benoît Louis;Patrick Nguyen

  • ZSM-5 coatings on β-SiC monoliths : Possible new structured catalyst for the methanol-to-olefins process

    S. Ivanova;B. Louis;B. Madani;J. P. Tessonnier

  • Copper–Zeolites as Catalysts for the Coupling of Terminal Alkynes: An Efficient Synthesis of Diynes

    Philippe Kuhn;Aurélien Alix;Mayilvasagam Kumarraja;Mayilvasagam Kumarraja;Benoit Louis

  • H-ZSM-5 zeolite model crystals: Structure-diffusion-activity relationship in methanol-to-olefins catalysis

    Pit Losch;Ana B. Pinar;Marc Georg Willinger;Karel Soukup

  • Quantitative measurement of the Brönsted acid sites in solid acids: toward a single-site design of Mo-modified ZSM-5 zeolite.

    Jean-Philippe Tessonnier;Benoît Louis;Stephane Walspurger;Jean Sommer

  • Quantitative Determination of Brönsted Acid Sites on Zeolites: A New Approach Towards the Chemical Composition of Zeolites

    Benoît Louis;Stéphane Walspurger;Jean Sommer

  • Synthesis of ZSM-5 zeolite in fluoride media: an innovative approach to tailor both crystal size and acidity

    Benoît Louis;Lioubov Kiwi-Minsker

  • About the octopus-like growth mechanism of carbon nanofibers over graphite supported nickel catalyst

    Cuong Pham-Huu;Ricardo Vieira;Ricardo Vieira;Benoit Louis;Alain Carvalho

  • Highly dispersed iron oxide nanoclusters supported on ordered mesoporous SBA-15: A very active catalyst for Friedel–Crafts alkylations

    Yinyong Sun;Stéphane Walspurger;Jean-Philippe Tessonnier;Benoît Louis

  • Hierarchical Pore ZSM-5 Zeolite Structures: from Micro to Macro-Engineering of Structured Catalysts

    Benoît Louis;Fabien Okampo;Hiu-Suk Yun;Jean-Philippe Tessonnier

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Pale
Patrick Pale University of Strasbourg
Qiang Wang
Qiang Wang Beijing Forestry University
Cuong Pham-Huu
Cuong Pham-Huu University of Strasbourg
Jean-Philippe Tessonnier
Jean-Philippe Tessonnier Iowa State University
Albert Renken
Albert Renken École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Lioubov Kiwi-Minsker
Lioubov Kiwi-Minsker École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Balasubramanian Viswanathan
Balasubramanian Viswanathan Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Ch. Subrahmanyam
Ch. Subrahmanyam Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
Alain Kiennemann
Alain Kiennemann University of Strasbourg
Marc Georg Willinger
Marc Georg Willinger Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open doors to diverse careers related to Chemistry. For those interested in the justice system, programs like criminal justice offer affordable options. To understand the investment required, reviewing how much does a criminal justice degree cost provides valuable insights on tuition and fees.

Beginning learners may consider quality foundational programs. The best online associate degree programs in criminal justice highlight accessible routes to start a career or advance further education.

Chemistry graduates can also transition to roles with strong earning potential outside traditional labs. For instance, becoming a paralegal offers specialized career paths, and knowing what types of paralegals make the most money helps identify lucrative niches.

Another promising option is pharmaceutical sales. Chemistry knowledge is a key asset in this field, and understanding how much do drug reps make gives clarity on salary expectations and career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Benoit Louis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles